Mon, May 21, 2012, 12:09 BST - UK Markets close in 4 hrs 21 mins

Discover Yahoo! With Your Friends

Explore news, videos, and much more based on what your friends are reading and watching. Publish your own activity and retain full control.

To get started, first

YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    Watch out if you’ve been sold this insurance!

    Have you been mis-sold a whole of life insurance policy?

    When it comes to insurance and investment products, we have a simple philosophy here at lovemoney.com: Keep them separate.

    If you want to profit from an investment, look for the very best investment vehicle you can find. And if you want to protect yourself from a specific threat using an insurance policy, look for the very best cover you can get.

    That way, you can rest assured the financial product you get fills the exact purpose you bought it for.

    Take any other approach and you risk getting a mishmash of an insurance and an investment product that fulfils neither function very well.

    'Whole of life cover' is a typical example of this.

    What is whole of life cover?

    Most life insurance policies will only pay out if you die within a set period of time: the term of the policy. By contrast, whole of life policies are guaranteed to pay out whenever you die. So as long as you keep paying the premiums, your estate's guaranteed a pay-out at the time of your death.

    Sounds too good to be true? Then alarm bells should be ringing.

    Why were these policies able to offer much better terms?

    The reason these policies could offer much better terms than other life insurance policies was because whole of life policies combined life insurance with a complex investment plan.

    The theory was that the investment returns would make it worthwhile for the insurer to pay out a large lump sum to you on your death, even though you may have hardly paid any money in premiums and your death - like taxes - is a certainty.

    What's happened recently?

    The good news is, whole of life policies are not generally available anymore. But these policies are causing problems for many lovemoney.com readers now, because they were sold 10 years ago with totally unrealistic investment growth assumptions of 9% a year.

    Big surprise... a decade later, most investments have failed to meet these expectations. So the insurers are having to rely on some crafty terms in the small print. This stated that the insurer could increase the premiums after 10 years, or decrease the level of cover.

    So insurers have started telling customers to either increase their monthly premiums or accept a lower level of cover. And when they complain, the insurer points to the small print and tells them it is their own fault for not reading it properly.

    The worst thing is, these policies were targeted at people in their 50s who wanted to ensure their inheritance tax bill would be covered when they died. So they can't just simply accept a lower level of cover because they need that bill to be paid. But as they are now in their 60s and likely on a fixed income, they can't pay more either.

    Have you been mis-sold?

    If you've taken out one of these policies and you think you were misled about the risks involved, then you should contact the firm that sold you the policy in the first instance. If that doesn't get you anywhere, then you should contact the Financial Ombudsman to try to get compensation.

    You may have a case if the fact that the policy premiums were reviewable was not explained properly to you, or it was inappropriate for you to take out a reviewable policy and the adviser knew this.

    "Depending on the particular facts of the complaint, it will not always be sufficient for a firm merely to say that it mentioned the potential for review in its product literature," the Ombudsman announced in its statement on whole of life plans.

    "There could be very important reasons why the policyholder needed life assurance at a certain level, such as to pay for an inheritance tax bill or other debt. So we may uphold complaints where the possible effects of plan reviews are not, in our view, made sufficiently clear or given sufficient prominence."

    What should you look for in a life insurance policy?

    The good news is, life insurance has got a lot cheaper in the last 10 years so you should be able to find a more affordable policy nowadays if you shop around.

    The trouble is, there are lots of different types of life insurance policy, and it's important to get the right one for your needs.

    To do this, the first thing you need to think about is why you need cover. For example, you might want to cover your mortgage to ensure your family won't get kicked out of your home when you die.

    Then think about the term of the policy - many parents, for example, like to ensure their income is protected until their youngest child turns 18 (should the parents die beforehand). That way, their kids won't have to worry about money until they are old enough to support themselves.

    More from lovemoney.com

    Are you spending more or less than average?

    New cashback card shakes up the market

    Average Brit only has £98 to spare at end of the month

     

    77 comments

    • Michael63  •  8 months ago
      Yahoo journalism again... there is no such thing as Life insurance - its Life Assurance you cannot insure against death (insurance) as its a certainly but you can Assure that money will be paid when it happens (Assurance).

      if yahoo can't even get the terms right do we really trust any advice they give!
      • From Luddite Lodge 8 months ago
        Yeah there are certain issues that Yahoo publish just to get people going, usually badly written and uniformative. There are all sorts of whole life policies but you don't get that from the article.
      • SlightlylessBigsumo 8 months ago
        Life insurance, cover against the possibility of death in a given time frame, such as the life of a mortgage. Life Assurance - whole life cover as described in the article. The suggestion is that Life Assurance linked to an investment vehicle is pointless, take out life insurance and a stand alone investment product like a shares ISA. If you live to the end of the insurance term you will pay higher premiums for a second term as you will be older, but that will still be cheaper than the whole life premium when they double or triple it at each review point.
    • Ian  •  8 months ago
      For a start the title of the piece is incorrect, as are all of you who are talking about 'Insurance'. You Insure against something that might happen not against something that will happen, in this case Death. You cannot insure against that. What you are are all talking about is called Assurance. What happens is that you take out a policy with an Insurance Company or Mutual Society that on the event of your death pays out an Assured sum. With Whole Life Policies that means just that, for that rest of your life although some companies will stop the premiums but the cover will remain once you reach a certain age, perhaps 75 or 80. The policy can be with profits (ie it earns) or without profits (the sum assured is what your heirs get, no more, no less). With profits cost you more as there is an investment element in the premiums.

      I expect lots of thumbs downs and flack from the great un..........
      • From Luddite Lodge 8 months ago
        Whole Life policies have been around for centuries, and will doubtless outlast Yahoo unless the FSA puts a stop on them. The same FSA which failed to regulate the banks. I explained in an earlier post how a Whole Life policy taken out in 1916 paid out in 2002 (and I needed every bit of help at the time).Some people ticked it downwards which is probably an indication of how the concepts of saving and prudence are vilified by some Yahoo readers.
    • Kate  •  8 months ago
      I had husband insured simply to pay funeral expenses. Of course we have had loadsof mail shots from these insurance people asking us to increase monthly payments.We haven't.What we have done instead is leave our bodies to medical science!! All done. No funeral bills! Cackle!!!
      • scott 8 months ago
        Brilliant! I need to investigate...
      • From Luddite Lodge 8 months ago
        The problem is that it is comforting to eave flowers on days such as birthdays etc. Believe me not all expenses associated with death are to do with the funeral.
    • Phil  •  8 months ago
      got one of these, company has changed hands three times, just had a letter saying my expected payout of 18000 will be reduiced to 13000 unless I increase my payment by 30% with no guarrantee that this will not happen again Nice ! they can do what they like as the goverment just turns a blind eye
    • calvin  •  8 months ago
      This was not about whole lif cover, but about insurnace aganist bad health.

      I had an incident where I had to stop work due to ill health. I was self employed.
      I had insurance for both my buisiness account and my credit card. Both of which were most helpful, and the one even sent out one of their people to help me complete the forms. They then paid out as good as gold. Those companies are two of the Big 4 banks. When I bought the insurnace products I had asked what I was buying and made sure that it was the product I needed.

      It is like anything it is YOUR responsability as the BUYER to ask questions and check what you are buying. The same as you do when you are buying a house, a car or any major expense. Go with your eyes wide open and remember that any INSURANCE, PENSION or LOAN you are getting the agent you are speaking to WILL be getting a fee.
    • Patch 57  •  8 months ago
      All Insurance policies for death are a con. My Dad was 82 when he died and he had taken out a policy 15 years before to pay his funeral costs. By the time he died the funeral cost 2x what the policy paid. He had paid in more that the policy paid. If he had stopped paying it would have been nul and void. To get the company to pay out was a pain in the ***. Because the reason for his death was not known and there had to be an inquiery by the Coroner (which took 3 months), the company refused to pay. I pointed out that my Dad was 82, he had died and I had to pay for the funeral. They would not accept the interin Death Certificate and so I had to wait. It was all very distressing, which I also pointed out to them. Some letters I received from them were quite rude. It was actually just a great big con. Beware!! Never take out one of these policies. I am angry with the so called celebrities and actors making TV adverts so that older people think it is OK.
      • INJUSTICE 8 months ago
        Name and Shame the Insurance Company, it will make you feel so much better.
      • just me 8 months ago
        thieves the lot of them
    • MICHAEL  •  8 months ago
      Beware of any financial product that is sold by the likes of Michael Parkinson, or any so-called celebrity, who are doing it for the money and nothing else. This sort of advertising that appears on afternoon television together with the 'ambulance chasers' is disgraceful. It appears that the Government is doing something about the latter. It should now turn its attention to the former.
    • IAN  •  8 months ago
      It just isn't life insurance it is building and contents insurance they rip you off with and Churchill insurance is the worst. We have a claim that has been on going for 8 months now where they are saying that they want to repair window frames and door frame that were vandalise by yobs with wax and crayon the damage is to deep to carry out the repairs . we have a report that clearly states that the frames are unrepairable but they are hell bent on carrying out repairs and then saying if you are not happy with this contact the financial ombudsman who work hand in hand with the insurance companies what chance have you got
      • Skelden 8 months ago
        Thanks for the warning. There is absolutely no way I would now consider Churchill for any insurance at all. Alhtough I suspect they are all as bad as each other and it is about time some of these rip off organisations were removed from all market places. Including a black list of the maggots employed by them.
    • alan  •  8 months ago
      What a load of rubbish! Yes there are investment backed Whole of Life policies, however there are also pure Whole of Life protection policies with NO INVESTMENT CONTENT a fact which has been completely missed by the writer of this piece!
      It is half baked articles like this which arm the public with false 'facts' and yet another example of a little information in the wrong hands is a dangerous thing.
      The main point that ANYONE should cover when looking for any advice in protection or investment is make sure that you read through the policy information thoroughly YOURSELF!!! Know the risks and your commitments you are undertaking and make sure that any product you buy is not forced upon you and you are comfortable in taking the risks or making the regular premiums. One of the largest risks of Whole of Life contracts to be aware of it that the premiums generally need to be paid throughout the term, therefore you should be comfortable that you will be able to afford the premiums not only whilst you are working but also through into retirement.
      FINANCIAL ADVICE IS PERSONAL AND EACH PERSONS OBJECTIVES WILL BE DIFFERENT!!!
    • Leonna  •  8 months ago
      Best way is to save up £5 or £10 per month. Then when you die, your family can pay for your funeral out of what you've saved. Also do this to replace washing machines, fridge/freezers etc. Insure buildings only. Don't pay insurance companies. It would appear that most of them have been taken over by RBS anyway. Need I say more?
    • Alex  •  8 months ago
      Why is there so much blatent spam here and all the forums? Hmmmmmmm
    • douglas  •  8 months ago
      It is time that the FSA cracked down on these mickey mouse over 50 whole life plans that don't offer a paid up or surrender value if you stop paying premiums. It's a complete rip-off.
    • BARRY  •  8 months ago
      This article is only partially correct. A whole of life plan can offer fixed premiums for the whole payment term with a fixed payout. The author should be writing about the plans which offer a guaranteed acceptance as there is no medicial yet will not pay out on death within the first two years and you can also pay in more than you get paid out. Axa seem to have the market share on this rubbish type of plan usually called an over 50's plan.
    • April  •  8 months ago
      "insurance and investment products" No they are services!
      "investment vehicle" Is that a bus or a taxi?
      "financial product" No. again a service!

      Yet another example of a 'journalist' supporting the myth that these blood suckers actually manufacture something. Where has the manufacturing industry gone? Sold off to overseas companies that promptly shut them down and move the machinery to their own countries. We are no more than assembly plants that are opened and closed at will.
    • Stevonymo  •  8 months ago
      Insurance companies are fine till you say "I need to claim." "What, Eh...You can't claim, you are just here to pay your premiums! Having said that More Than were better than most I have dealt with over the years.
    • Ian  •  8 months ago
      People on here saying that you don't get left on top. Indeed that is correct, the local council are responsible for disposing of the dead in the event of no one else doing it. In return they then take 100% of the deceased possessions, including the house, and are not required to return any value to any heirs after paying for the funeral. This is nothing to do with dying intestate, that is a completely separate subject.
    • Plato  •  8 months ago
      My whole life insurance company said it would increased my premium by 400% or reduce the benefit by 75%. The financial Ombudsman said they had the right to do so, but wouldn't rule on if it was reasonable! I can pay a lawyer to sue, if I can afford to pay for one, which I can't and I have no assurance that I will win. They said the Agent who sold it to me didn't work for them, even though he used their letterhead. I am screwed!
    • DRIFTER1UK  •  8 months ago
      What a rip off--someone (im being nice with that name) steal and maybe wreck your car, Granted you may get a pay-out from the insurers--but then --they increase your premiums to get all there monies back--A win-win situation for them
    • Shug  •  8 months ago
      Stop being a peasant. You just make the rich richer. Sure if you want to protect your family if you are young (that's if you have one) if you croke young, then get a bit of life insurance. Otherwise, just buy shares and other investments (buy a flat house etc rent them out when you have enough, capitilise on capital gain). Diversify. I'm in Oz and we have compulsory superannuation of about 9% of income paid by the employer. But like anything compulsory it's a jip. It's to save the government money when you are an old chook. They will pay it back in small bits like feeding the chooks. Cluk cluk.
    • Gentlemanjon  •  8 months ago
      Whole life was originally intended to be a burial policy and people who took one out for that purpose willl not have the problem that the writer claims exist. The writer is tarring all insurance companies with the same brush, but then only mentioning policies sold ten years ago. Many years ago I started a low premium low payout policy with a fixed death benefit plus annual and terminal bonuses. It was sold on the basis that ONLY the guaranteed part was definite, the rest may or may not occur. I accept that the longer I live the more the insurance company could make, that is part of my element of the risk. Is mis-selling policies any worse than mis-reporting an article due to bias and poor research?