Thu, May 24, 2012, 06:45 BST - UK Markets open in 1 hr 15 mins

Discover Yahoo! With Your Friends

Explore news, videos, and much more based on what your friends are reading and watching. Publish your own activity and retain full control.

To get started, first

YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    How Alan Sugar made his money

    He’s a business guru, peer of the realm and judge and jury of hopeful entrepreneurs on ‘The Apprentice’ – but exactly how did Alan Sugar actually make his money?


    From humble beginnings in London’s East End to a £770 million fortune and a ranking of 89th in the Sunday Times Rich List 2011, Alan Sugar’s is a true rags to riches tale.

    Knighted in 2000 for services to business and given a peerage in 2009 as part of a new enterprise role for Gordon Brown’s government, wannabe-entrepreneurs can learn a lot from Baron Sugar of Clapton.

    But it’s not all been plain sailing. Despite making millions from Amstrad and making fools of hapless candidates on the Apprentice, Sugar has also made plenty of mistakes along the way.

    How he got started

    Born in Hackney in 1947 and brought up in a council flat, Sugar left school at 16 and after a brief spell in the civil service, famously started selling car aerials out of the back of a van using savings of just £100. His earnings were soon outstripping those of his father, Nathan, a tailor. At the age of 21 he founded Amstrad, a name which came from his initials (Alan Michael Sugar TRADing).

    Within two years he was manufacturing low-priced hi-fi turntable covers and in 1980, Amstrad was floated on the London Stock Exchange.

    The 1980s were Sugar’s heyday. It was the era of home computers and the Amstrad CPC 464 proved popular despite tough competition from the Sinclair ZX Spectrum and Commodore 64. The Amstrad PCW 8256 word processor shortly followed and its success meant Amstrad’s share price and market value doubled each year.

    By the time he turned 40 in 1987 Sugar was worth about £600 million and was the 15th richest person in the UK. At its peak Amstrad was valued at £1.2 billion.


    No repeat success

    However, the 1990s weren’t quite so lucrative for Sugar. The launch of a range of business PCs was damaged by unreliable hard disks and Amstrad took the disks’ manufacturer Seagate to court. Although Amstrad won the case, its reputation in the PC market was severely dented and the company moved instead into the games console market. But the Amstrad GX4000 couldn’t compete with consoles by Nintendo and Sega which offered a wider choice of games – another bad decision.

    Diversification into the telecoms market followed in 1993 with a PDA called PenPad and later a combined telephone and email device called the e-m@iler. Neither sold well and in 2007 Amstrad was sold to BskyB for £125 million, a fraction of its peak value. Initially Sugar planned to continue to play a part in the business – which by then made set-top boxes for Sky – but he stood down as chairman the following year.

    As well as business, Sugar is a big football fan and teamed up with Terry Venables to buy Tottenham Hotspur in 1991. Although he helped the club out of a financial hole, his involvement didn’t go down well with Spurs fans and his relationship with Venables turned sour. He sold his majority stake in Spurs in 2001 and the remainder in 2007, citing his time at the club as “a waste of my life”.

    Locking in his wealth


    By this time he had several other companies up and running under his holding company Amshold. Founded in 1993 and run by his son Daniel, Amsair offers business and executive jet charters. Daniel Sugar also oversees Amsprop, a property investment firm. It owns the IBM South Bank building and is the company Simon Ambrose, winner of the 2007 series of ‘The Apprentice’, went to work for (although he has since left).

    Winners of the 2008 and 2009 series of ‘The Apprentice’ (Lee McQueen and Yasmina Siadatan) both went to work at another of Lord Sugar’s companies, Amscreen, which sells advertising space on digital signage. Amsceen is run by Lord Sugar’s other son Simon.

    Formed in 1975 and acquired by Amstrad in 1994, Viglen is now Lord Sugar’s only IT company. Viglen is run by Bordan Tkachuk who makes regular appearances on ‘The Apprentice’. Viglen’s headquarters in St Albans also plays a part in The Apprentice, providing the scene for the “walk of shame” when the fired candidate departs in a taxi.

    Turning success into fame

    ‘The Apprentice’ made Sugar a television star as well as business guru. Starting in 2005, the reality TV show saw candidates compete for a £100,000 job with one of Sir Alan’s companies, and later a business partnership with the man himself. Unsuccessful applicants were sent on their way with the non-negotiable “you’re fired” accompanied by Sugar’s famous pointing finger of doom.

    Contrary to his on-screen Mr Grumpy persona, Sugar is pretty generous with his cash. He donates his BBC fee for presenting ‘The Apprentice’ to Great Ormond Street Hospital as well as his pay for appearing in adverts for National Savings and Investments. He also allegedly returns his £200 Winter Fuel Allowance, an annual sum given out to all over 60s.

    Despite giving money away, the serial entrepreneur still has enough left to own mansions in Essex, Spain and Florida which he can fly between in one of his two private jets worth a combined £33.5 million. His fleet of expensive cars include a Land Rover, Bentley, Ferrari and a Rolls Royce Phantom.

    The secret to his success, according to him

    Lord Sugar also negotiated his own book deal for an undisclosed sum with Pan Macmillan. His autobiography ‘What You See Is What You Get’ was a best seller in 2010.

    In the book Lord Sugar reveals the secret of his success. His method involves watching what the market leaders are doing, making better and cheaper products, and selling to the mass market at cheap prices rather than the “hi market”.

    In his autobiography he claims to be an “all-rounder” in his business, sitting on the production line and assembling the first units of any new models his company produced.

    However, despite his millions, his business sense is not always spot on. In February 2005 he predicted that the iPod would be "dead, finished, gone, kaput" by the following Christmas. Six years later Apple reported that 300 million iPods had been sold worldwide.

    But then having the ingenuity to make money from almost nothing, riding a technology boom and then having the sense to diversify in case the good times ended meant his mega-wealth is assured, even if he never has a good idea again.

     
    • Sandra  •  Brighton, England  •  13 days ago
      What's wrong with working hard and doing well? Sounds like alot of jealous people out there!
    • Steven  •  Reading, England  •  14 days ago
      How Alan Sugar Got Rich? He sold sub standard Amstrad decoders to sky tv. If i am wrong then show me a sky member who did not have trouble with their Amstrad decoder.
    • Eric  •  London, England  •  3 months ago
      Did Emma Lunn, author of this item, use a "Vigen" spell checker?!! It's Viglen.
      • Myke 3 months ago
        I noticed that as well, who the hell proof reads these yahoo articles. They constantly have stupid errors like this.
      • PAUL 3 months ago
        Amsceen or Amscreen? LOL. It must have been Yaho!
      • Crazylegs 3 months ago
        Emma you need a kick up the arse girl its Viglen!
        If your going to write articles that are to be shown to the public please get the basics right!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    • JOHN  •  London, England  •  3 months ago
      Sid James"s son !
    • Neil  •  3 months ago
      You forgot to mention the money laundering.
      • Kavita 3 months ago
        Absolutely Big conman are operating big launderette!! No sir ni lord just conman!!Labour anD Gordon brown should have asked me!!
      • Psychonaut 3 months ago
        I hope he reads this and sues your lazy backsides. Oh wait, it wouldn't be worth suing you as you both sound like paupers.
    • richard  •  Cieza, Spain  •  3 months ago
      I agree with all those who say his products were #$%$I never bought any, but repaired a few for some unfortunate people that did. Typical east end wide boy. Guru my ar*e.
    • bill  •  London, England  •  3 months ago
      Sugar forced people to give him the share back mine where taken away and i got £4500 for Viglen shares that cost me £34,000 so like david b56 brighton england i lost a lot of money as i was just told we sold your shares by the abbey sharedealing people
      IT WAS STATED SUGAR SACKED HIS OWN FATHER IN RIDLEY ROAD
      HE NEVER LOOKED AFTER PEOPLE AS HE WENT UP THE LADDER AS HE PROMISED THEM HE WOULD
    • Denis  •  Hounslow, England  •  3 months ago
      Yes he was a hard worker but the problem is, I and many others no doubt, associate all products produced by his companies as shoddy, poor quality and prone to failing within two years (usually much less). He also could never really anticipate what the market wanted, continually producing items that were laughable and unwanted, hence the low sales.
    • LeonE  •  London, England  •  3 months ago
      Apparently Lord Sugar is much like a fruit machine in that if you make the correct sequence of facial expressions and winks to him, he'll involuntarily dispense cash to you immediately.
    • rdkill  •  Maidenhead, England  •  3 months ago
      he learned everything he knew from @DavisgoldWHU
    • Steven  •  3 months ago
      Don't get me wrong I love the guy. But it seems he just got lucky. Amstrad back in the day was what made his fortune but what has he done since apart from be on the TV. Seems to me after Amstrad went t*ts up he made a whole host of poor decisions. An Amstrad console to rival Nintendo and Sega???? PDA PenPad????? and Email and Telephone combined??? WTF!! Sounds a bit Del Boy to me!
    • LoudnProud  •  Edinburgh, Scotland  •  2 months ago
      Failing to mention the dodgy backhander deals done with local councils to supply shoddy computers to government/NHS/Schools, which promptly broke down continually, and instead of suing him they just bought replacements and made him even more money from us the taxpayers who footed the bill. branching out into national government contractsm to sell tatty computers, with the contracts given to those who supply the fattest brown envelope. With fingers deep into politicians pockets dropping cash and shares, there was never a doubt he would get an honour, its there way of keeping their brown envelope people happy and hush them up.
    • carol  •  London, England  •  14 days ago
      At least he is employing people and not sitting on his backside receiving benefits and moaning
      • Daily Plan it 14 days ago
        What like your good self is doing. If its so good why the need for the propaganda?
    • Connor Loxley  •  Edinburgh, Scotland  •  3 months ago
      good for him for donating his fees and returning his winter fuel allowence. Whether you like him or hate him; he has made that money and it is HIS to give away or he could keep every penny for himself should he choose so.
      • R 3 months ago
        Some people do that without telling everyone ...
      • The Kat 3 months ago
        Bill Gates has given millions to charities. Sugar or rather saccharin (false sweetness) has only donated what joe public would give !
      • phoenix 3 months ago
        i don't really see a problem with the american way of being open about what you give to charity. anything that makes more people be generous is fine by me
    • Dr. Zook  •  3 months ago
      Did you know that the BBC is being forced to hand over tens of millions of pounds every year to line Rupert Murdoch’s pockets? This unbelievable arrangement costs our public broadcasters up to £100 million a year! Rather than being paid for their valuable content, they actually have to pay BSkyB to show their programmes. This extortion is unprecedented in any other Western country -- and a sign of Murdoch’s shocking power.

      These are our millions -- handed over in license fees to fund British content, not to boost Murdoch’s profits. But an unfair system of “retransmission fees” designed by Murdoch leaves the BBC and other broadcasters with no choice. They are forced to pay BSkyB to show their channels, even though they add huge value to the satellite platform -- accounting for 41% of all shows watched on BSkyB and vastly increasing customer retention.

      Amazingly, Murdoch has argued the exact opposite in the US -- there, he charges cable TV companies over $250 million a year to show his content. With the same deal Murdoch gets in the US, our public service broadcasters would have hundreds of millions of pounds extra every year to invest in quality content. This money would allow the BBC to reverse its cuts to BBC4 and local radio overnight.

      Murdoch’s cronies in government are determined to save this scheme -- but together we can stop this outrage. In coming days, Culture Secretary Jeremy Hunt will decide whether to renew this dreadful deal -- and Murdoch's scandals have put him on the back foot. Our pressure can stop this BBC robbery. Go here to send your message to Hunt now:

      http://www.avaaz.org/en/stop_murdochs_bbc_robbery_2/?vl
    • Toby Twirl  •  London, England  •  3 months ago
      Behind every big fortune there is a BIG lie! Bernard Mathews used to march around Norfolk and Suffolk at Christmas buying up all the Turkeys from country auctions and took uo to a year or more to pay for them. Luck? Vision? Charism? No B*lls! and NO CONCIENCE. There is the formula! Wouldn't squish a bug? you betcha and all sizes up!
    • Angelica The Red  •  Stockport, England  •  3 months ago
      He had a vision, he researched, worked endlessly; lived and breathed it. People have a choice to buy or do the same themselves. He deserves the success he's achieved.
    • WP  •  Hounslow, England  •  3 months ago
      Oh yes, please explain EXACTLY how Sugar 'made' his money..............
    • TJ  •  12 days ago
      It beats me why a succesful businessman, lord and knight of the realm wants to be on the telly entertaining the couch potatoes?
      Sad vain twit!
    • Graham  •  Ilford, England  •  3 months ago
      Does ANYONE here understand just how hard it was to get one hunderd pounds at the time suggested, when a house could be bought for four hundred pounds! what did he do? save his pocket money? or his paper round money? the truth is everyone is told look up to these people and you could achieve if you work hard, well i know plenty of people who work 55 to 75 hour weeks and still struggle to live, it would be VERY INTERESTING if Mr Sugar could tell us everything about His buisness life from the begining to the present day, but that will never happen!...