Thu, May 24, 2012, 06:49 BST - UK Markets open in 1 hr 11 mins

Discover Yahoo! With Your Friends

Explore news, videos, and much more based on what your friends are reading and watching. Publish your own activity and retain full control.

To get started, first

YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    How to keep your Child Benefit

    Using these three tricks, top taxpayers can keep this tax-free payment after April 2013.



    As you're no doubt aware, our Government has one huge financial problem. In December 2011, the UK's national debt rose above £1 trillion -- that's a one followed by 12 zeroes!

    What's more, our collective overdraft is currently increasing by £10 billion a month because the Government is spending about £6 for every £5 it collects in taxes and other income. In other words, Britain is getting deeper and deeper into debt, which will eventually put our country's highly prized AAA credit rating at risk.

    Squeezing the middle

    Hence, in order to balance its budget over time, the Government is cutting back on the welfare benefits paid to British households. For example, in the 2010/11 tax year, HM Revenue & Customs spent £12 billion on Child Credit, plus another £28.1 billion in other tax credits to working families and pensioners.

    To help curb this spending spree, Chancellor George Osborne announced in October 2010 that Child Benefit would no longer be a universal benefit paid to all parents, regardless of their wealth and income. Instead, from the 2013/14 tax year onwards, top taxpayers will no longer be entitled to this tax-free payment.


    A valuable benefit

    Therefore, from 6 April 2013, Child Benefit will be means-tested, so higher-rate (40%) and additional-rate (50%) taxpayers will no longer receive this valuable benefit. Here are the current rates of Child Benefit, which have been frozen until April 2014:

    Child

    Per

    week

    Per

    year

    First or eldest

    £20.30

    £1,055.60

    Other child

    £13.40

    £696.80


    My wife and I have two young children. As a result, my spouse receives 13 four-weekly Child Benefit payments of £134.80, which amounts to a tax-free total of £1,752.40 a year.

    As a higher-rate taxpayer, my wife pays a marginal tax rate of 42% (40% income tax plus 2% National Insurance contributions). Her Child Benefit is worth £3,021.38 a year before tax and, therefore, she stands to lose more than three grand a year from next April.
    Three ways to beat the system

    Then again, my wife's personal tax adviser (that's me) has already figured out a simple, easy way for her to hang on to all of her Child Benefit. Here are three ways that top taxpayers can legally beat the system and retain this tax-free support for their families in future:


    1. Pump up your pension

    The simplest way to avoid losing your Child Benefit is to avoid becoming a higher-rate tax payer in the first place.

    The personal tax allowance for 2011/12 is £7,475, followed by a tax rate of 20% on the next £35,000 of earned income. Thus, the 40% tax rate kicks in for most taxpayers on earned income above £42,475 a year.

    Anyone who can get their income just £1 below whatever the higher-rate threshold will be in 2013/14 will keep all of their Child Benefit, which could be worth thousands of pounds a year, free of tax.

    For workers earning £40,000+ a year, the easier way to sneak below the 40% tax threshold is to pay more into their pensions. For example, paying an extra £2,000 a year into a pension could cut your take-home pay by just £1,200, thanks to 40% tax relief on this contribution.

    What's more, if this additional pension contribution safeguards your Child Benefit, then it could mean thousands of pounds a year in extra income. One other way of achieving this would be to sacrifice part of your salary, in return for higher yearly pension contributions from your employer.

    Of course, if you do go down this route, then make doubly sure that your pension contributions are high enough to drag you below the higher-rate threshold in 2013/14 and thereafter.

    2. Collect childcare vouchers

    A second way for higher-rate taxpayers to slip below the 40% tax band is to collect childcare vouchers from employers. By surrendering some of your pay for these tax-free vouchers, you can reduce your taxable income by up to £243 a month, or £2,916 a year.

    Alas, since last April, this allowance has been cut to £28 a week for 40% taxpayers and £22 a week for 50% taxpayers (those earning over £150,000 a year). The good news is that existing members of childcare schemes still get the previous tax-free allowance in place before April 2011. Hence, this change affects only new joiners since 6 April 2011.

    Grabbing your full allowance of childcare vouchers could drop your pay below the crucial 40% threshold.


    3. Become a company

    My third - and most radical - solution to this Child Benefit problem is to start your own private limited company. This can be a highly tax-efficient way to earn a good income while paying minimal amounts of tax.

    For example, you could decide to pay yourself a minimal wage (below the thresholds for income tax and National Insurance), all of which would be tax-free. Then, instead of paying yourself any more in salary, you declare and pocket dividends from your company shareholding.

    As long as your total income doesn't exceed the 40% tax threshold, then no extra tax is due on these dividends. However, your company will have to pay corporation tax at the 'small profits' rate of 20% on these dividends.

    What's more, any dividends above this level attract higher-rate tax at 32.5%, less a notional tax credit of 10%. In effect, this translates to an effective tax rate of 22.5% of the declared dividend or a quarter (25%) of the net dividend in your hand.

    Then again, incorporating as a company isn't an option for most employees, as an anti-avoidance rule known as IR35 requires that you prove you are not simply "an employee at arm's length."

    In addition, there is a great deal of paperwork required to be a company director, so you may need to pay an accountant to administer your payroll and tax affairs. Even so, this is a very attractive tax route for high-earning consultants, the self-employed and freelancers like me.

    More from lovemoney.com
    Get on top of your money complications
    Ignorance could halve your pension
    Facebook could kill free banking

     
    • Abigail  •  London, England  •  3 months ago
      Pity we cannot report this article to Yahoo as being abuse - abuse of the system! This guy is nothing more than a thief!
    • jo  •  Southampton, England  •  3 months ago
      I dont have a fabulous income but will be using my child benefit to give my son an income while he completes his fulltime college course. Employees won't give the younger generation a chance to gain the essential life skills for employment as businesses are squeezed for cash and it is to much of a risk. Agree with me or not , i just feel very saddened at the state of youth unemployment and want the best for my son.
    • Tom  •  Brighton, England  •  3 months ago
      God. This article makes me ashamed to be British.
    • Sean Lang  •  Manchester, England  •  3 months ago
      you are a disgrace. there a people in this country that genuinely need the extra help and selfish greedy people like you is the reason the country is in such a state, you should be ashamed of yourself.
    • Rob W  •  3 months ago
      Cant understand why the government pays for chavs to breed!
    • Amanda  •  Ilford, England  •  3 months ago
      My husband & I have a joint income of just over £60k. Until recently we would have been entitled to Working Tax Credits, Child Tax Credits & also Child Benefit. We took the decision that with our income although having the benefits is nice, we don't actually 'need' it the way some other people do & therefore a few years ago took the decision to not claim what we were entitled to.
      Surely any benefit should be available to those that need it & only those people that actually do need it as opposed to just wanting more money? Those people on a big enough income to pay higher rate tax & are claiming benefits are in my honest opinion just greedy & part of the reason why this country is in such a mess at the moment. It is impossible for any government to sustain paying out billions of pounds of benefits per year to people who earn enough to not need it. No wonder we are in so much debt!
      • Saranne 3 months ago
        Well done to you Amanda. The benefits system is very confusing as my husband and I earn less than £30k and have applied for Working Tax credit and Child Tax credit and have been told we are not entitled to either ! We of course do get child benefit as does everyone ,including the millionaires, who also don't pay their tax fully. We both work hard so just working hard is not enough.
      • ta 3 months ago
        Amanda, you are great! this country needs more people like you.
      • Unreal 3 months ago
        Why not claim it? If you don't they'll just waste it some place else or give it away...
    • Kell  •  Aberdeen, Scotland  •  3 months ago
      It's because of people who try to "skirt around" the threshold limits that the government is having to cut back even more, meannig those who really DO need the money are going ot be penalised because of the actions of those who are better off than them to begin with.

      There are other areas that should be cut back before this though - All those who leave their own country to come here should not be given benefits - they should be expected to get jobs to support themselves, not live of fthe money that WE have paid into the system al these years. I hve nothing against those who come here with a solid work ethic, but there are plenty who come just to sit at home on benefits, getting everything paid for by the government and local authorities...
      • LEE 3 months ago
        No its because of all those lazy people who can't get off their backsides and find, or even create a job for themselves. Let me think....

        Earn £47k and pay approx £9k in tax and get £1k back in child benefit - net benefit to the government of £8k pa.

        Earn nothing and get £26k pa in benefits. Net cost to the government £26k.

        It takes 3 higher rate earners to support 1 lazy good for nothing, wheres the logic in that?
      • christina 3 months ago
        i have 4 children. my husband was made redundant he worked since he left school. we are at the moment on benefits he has been to interviews and applying for jobs. not everybody on benefits is lazy !!!!
      • VELVET 3 months ago
        no , not people who have lost their jobs because they know what its like to get a wage packet & support themselves. but there are too many that have never worked & don't want to because all they know id the job centre.
    • Gerard  •  3 months ago
      In stead of giving money would food, book, clothing etc vouchers not be a more economical and sensible system? At least this way the CHILDREN would benifit from tax payers money and parents would simply accomodate their development and not use the money for a take away, carry out, car repairs or anthing else that the BENIFIT is not intended for!!!!!!
      • HAYLEY 3 months ago
        If I got vouchers instead of money, I would perfere it, as for me the money goes on food and gas anyway
      • Gerard 3 months ago
        Effectively used then brilliant. Maybe if the government cut a deal with the likes of sainsburys, mothercare, pheonix etc at a bas price they could pass this on to the likes of yourself and the vouchers would maybe work out worth more than the money they currently give?
      • Micky 3 months ago
        or wacky baccy and super strength lager
    • RACHELLE  •  London, England  •  3 months ago
      Why not put a curb on how many kids the government will pay for ie. only the first two children, that way if you decide to have more children that is down to you and stops certain people having 12 kids !!!!
      • katy 3 months ago
        Good idea, after all it works in China.
      • ta 3 months ago
        well this is one of the few good comments here. I agree. one or 2 kids are fine anythig else should be at your expense, cause its a luxury.
      • LJ 3 months ago
        Why should we be paying Child Benefit for people earning over £150k anyway? You can't stop people having 12 kids, it could be seen as religious persecution, and anyway the English population was in decline, that's why they let lots of people into the country.
    • KIRSTY  •  3 months ago
      This practice of becoming a PLC to reduce your personal tax liabiblity needs to be stopped, I suspect that if all the higher earning people using this loophole (eg footballers on mickeymouse wages"consultants"often public sector, etc) were forced to pay tax at the proper rate for their earnings, it would go a good way to sorting out the financial problems in this country. This is not an option open/viable to the majority of people at the lower end of the economy who are being hit the hardest.
      Time to open your eyes to what is really going on people, viva la revolution!!
      • LEE 3 months ago
        It's not a PLC, it's a ltd company. Completely different things. People really should not comment if they don't understand the subject. Go back to really Hello!
      • KIRSTY 3 months ago
        "Go back to really Hello" - what's that supposed to mean?The article stated "My third - and most radical - solution to this Child Benefit problem is to start your own Private Limited Company" Sorry if I offended you by using the initials PLC Lee, you are obviously a far greater intelligence than me ;-)Actually I'm watching "Hungry Sailors" - don't read #$%$ like Hello ;-) If you want to insult people, at least do it right you muppet.
      • KIRSTY 3 months ago
        And before anyone picks up on it, I know I put "liabiblity" above ;-)
    • Heather  •  St Albans, England  •  3 months ago
      angry too!!! hate this artical If my husband and i were earning anywhere near 40,000 between us then we would continue to LIVE WITHIN OUR MEANS and let the people who really need it have the money!!! p.s youth and community worker and part time teacher both fully educated before you assume what we do!!
    • paul  •  Birmingham, England  •  3 months ago
      Cliff d'arcy you money grabbing #$%$
    • Jackie  •  Brighton, England  •  3 months ago
      really, the government should be looking closer to home more, i.e. the expenses which the government spends each year, thats where they do need to cut backs on as well as everything else!
    • robert f  •  London, England  •  3 months ago
      Should stop paying winter fuel payments to people who live abroad and the means testing for CB should take into account both parents earnings and not just the one who claims the benefit.
    • BESS  •  3 months ago
      the immigrants working over here are allowed to send their child benefit home to the countries where they come from, perhaps that should be stopped.. I don't think articles like this should appear on here, we dont want to loose our AAA rating as we will all pay the price for that as well. The articled just makes the rich richer...
    • a  •  Ilford, England  •  3 months ago
      If a person is earning £40,000+ a year and can't live on that then there's something wrong i earn half of that and manage just to support a wife and 3 kids.
    • _  •  Reading, England  •  3 months ago
      If I were in a dual income family with an income above £40 000 (even if the author earns next to nothing it is still above £40k) I would be ashamed to admit I needed that £3k. I certainly wouldn't be publicly admitting it.
    • Liz  •  London, England  •  3 months ago
      I think that the benefit should just be paid for the first two children. If people want to have loads of kids then they should pay for them. It would hopefully stop people who think that its their right to have loads of kids who live off benefits to think twice. Or maybe not....
    • LORRAINE  •  London, England  •  3 months ago
      what about Child Benefit only to be paid to the first two children and no more.. this would hopefully stop big payments being paid to people who have so many children purely for the money, benefits & big houses, and this does happen because we read and see this so often.. also child benefit should not be paid outside great britain to children living separate from parents.
    • Saranne  •  Sheffield, England  •  3 months ago
      Well done, yahoo tell the rich how to get richer by keeping child BENEFIT while the media is vilifying the poor and unemployed for claiming benefits still playing the divide and rule game, but why change it as it is working.