Advertisement
UK markets closed
  • FTSE 100

    8,433.76
    +52.41 (+0.63%)
     
  • FTSE 250

    20,645.38
    +114.08 (+0.56%)
     
  • AIM

    789.87
    +6.17 (+0.79%)
     
  • GBP/EUR

    1.1622
    +0.0011 (+0.09%)
     
  • GBP/USD

    1.2525
    +0.0001 (+0.01%)
     
  • Bitcoin GBP

    48,596.02
    -1,602.36 (-3.19%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    1,260.14
    -97.87 (-7.21%)
     
  • S&P 500

    5,222.68
    +8.60 (+0.16%)
     
  • DOW

    39,512.84
    +125.08 (+0.32%)
     
  • CRUDE OIL

    78.20
    -1.06 (-1.34%)
     
  • GOLD FUTURES

    2,366.90
    +26.60 (+1.14%)
     
  • NIKKEI 225

    38,229.11
    +155.13 (+0.41%)
     
  • HANG SENG

    18,963.68
    +425.87 (+2.30%)
     
  • DAX

    18,772.85
    +86.25 (+0.46%)
     
  • CAC 40

    8,219.14
    +31.49 (+0.38%)
     

Judge blocks Brazilian assets of Vale, BHP after dam burst

By Stephen Eisenhammer and Bruno Marfinati

RIO DE JANEIRO/SAO PAULO Dec 19 (Reuters) - A judge in Brazil's state of Minas Gerais has frozen the Brazilian assets of mining giants BHP Billiton (NYSE: BBL - news) and Vale SA after determining their joint venture Samarco was unable to pay for damages caused by a burst dam at its mine last month.

In a ruling issued late on Friday, the judge ruled that Vale and BHP could be held responsible for the disaster at the iron ore mine in the state of Minas Gerais, for which the government is demanding 20 billion reais ($5 billion).

Vale told Reuters it had not yet been notified about the decision. BHP did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The companies are able to appeal.

ADVERTISEMENT

The burst dam, which turned into Brazil's worst ever environmental disaster, killed 16 people, left hundreds homeless and polluted an 800 km-long river that flows across two states.

Despite the scale of the disaster, Vale had argued Samarco, as an independent legal entity and a sizable company in its own right, was wholly responsible for the accident and the subsequent damages and fines.

But Federal Judge Marcelo Aguiar Machado disagreed. "I understand to be correct the allegation that Vale and BHP, as controllers of Samarco, can be classified as indirect polluters and as such responsible for the environmental damage caused," he wrote in his 19-page judgment.

The judgment did not specify the value of assets that had been blocked, but mentioned prosecutor estimates that Samarco did not have the funds to cover more that half of the 20 billion reais being sought in damages.

Machado imposed a number of other requirements too.

Among them: Samarco must make an initial deposit of 2 billion reais within 30 days to cover the clean up process. If the deadline is missed, the companies will face a fine of 1.5 million reais for each day the balance remains unpaid.

The companies must map out an extensive clean up plan and work out how to stop mud from contaminating sources of mineral water.

Samarco, BHP and Vale must also contract within 10 days a company to evaluate the contamination to fish caused by the mud slide, and the possible risk to humans who might consume them.

Failure to meet these deadlines, and others listed in the judgement, face a daily fine of 150,000 reais.

($1 = 3.98 reais) (Writing by Stephen Eisenhammer,; Editing by Raissa Kasolowsky)