Advertisement
UK markets closed
  • FTSE 100

    7,895.85
    +18.80 (+0.24%)
     
  • FTSE 250

    19,391.30
    -59.37 (-0.31%)
     
  • AIM

    745.67
    +0.38 (+0.05%)
     
  • GBP/EUR

    1.1626
    -0.0057 (-0.49%)
     
  • GBP/USD

    1.2392
    -0.0046 (-0.37%)
     
  • Bitcoin GBP

    51,932.18
    +741.87 (+1.45%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    1,378.45
    +65.83 (+5.02%)
     
  • S&P 500

    4,990.87
    -20.25 (-0.40%)
     
  • DOW

    38,031.99
    +256.61 (+0.68%)
     
  • CRUDE OIL

    83.45
    +0.72 (+0.87%)
     
  • GOLD FUTURES

    2,412.50
    +14.50 (+0.60%)
     
  • NIKKEI 225

    37,068.35
    -1,011.35 (-2.66%)
     
  • HANG SENG

    16,224.14
    -161.73 (-0.99%)
     
  • DAX

    17,737.36
    -100.04 (-0.56%)
     
  • CAC 40

    8,022.41
    -0.85 (-0.01%)
     

Is Freeport-McMoRan’s Agreement Binding?

Is Freeport-McMoRan’s Agreement Binding?

On July 12, Freeport-McMoRan (FCX) announced a “Heads of Agreement” with the Indonesian government and Rio Tinto (RIO). According to Reuters, “Heads of agreements are typically non-binding. However, Indonesia’s State Owned Enterprises Minister Rini Soemarno said the agreement is binding while Rio Tinto and Freeport both said the heads of agreement is just a step and not binding.” Let’s see why the three sides could have taken a divergent stance on the agreement’s nature.