Advertisement
UK markets close in 23 minutes
  • FTSE 100

    8,064.35
    +23.97 (+0.30%)
     
  • FTSE 250

    19,588.87
    -130.50 (-0.66%)
     
  • AIM

    752.77
    -1.92 (-0.25%)
     
  • GBP/EUR

    1.1655
    +0.0010 (+0.09%)
     
  • GBP/USD

    1.2482
    +0.0020 (+0.16%)
     
  • Bitcoin GBP

    50,779.82
    -1,338.24 (-2.57%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    1,372.20
    -10.37 (-0.75%)
     
  • S&P 500

    5,004.79
    -66.84 (-1.32%)
     
  • DOW

    37,824.57
    -636.35 (-1.65%)
     
  • CRUDE OIL

    82.10
    -0.71 (-0.86%)
     
  • GOLD FUTURES

    2,347.10
    +8.70 (+0.37%)
     
  • NIKKEI 225

    37,628.48
    -831.60 (-2.16%)
     
  • HANG SENG

    17,284.54
    +83.27 (+0.48%)
     
  • DAX

    17,884.93
    -203.77 (-1.13%)
     
  • CAC 40

    8,006.58
    -85.28 (-1.05%)
     

Total Has 50% “Buy” Ratings, but Not Much Coverage

Total Has 50% “Buy” Ratings, but Not Much Coverage

In June 2017, six analysts rated Total, and only one (or 17.0%) rated the stock as a “buy.” In June, only four analysts cover Total, of which two (or 50.0%) rated it as a “buy.” Although Total ranks fourth among the seven integrated energy stocks, the stock has quite low coverage compared to its peers. The implied gains in the stock have expanded due to a higher rise in Total’s mean target price (by 25.0%) compared to an increase in its stock price (by 21.0%) in the past year. This is higher than ExxonMobil (XOM) and Chevron (CVX) but lower than Royal Dutch Shell (RDS.A) and BP (BP).