Advertisement
UK markets closed
  • NIKKEI 225

    40,074.69
    +443.63 (+1.12%)
     
  • HANG SENG

    17,769.14
    +50.53 (+0.29%)
     
  • CRUDE OIL

    83.28
    -0.10 (-0.12%)
     
  • GOLD FUTURES

    2,338.40
    -0.50 (-0.02%)
     
  • DOW

    39,331.85
    +162.33 (+0.41%)
     
  • Bitcoin GBP

    48,840.74
    -1,037.88 (-2.08%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    1,332.89
    -11.61 (-0.86%)
     
  • NASDAQ Composite

    18,028.76
    +149.46 (+0.84%)
     
  • UK FTSE All Share

    4,429.66
    -21.82 (-0.49%)
     

With 63% ownership, Lincoln Educational Services Corporation (NASDAQ:LINC) boasts of strong institutional backing

Key Insights

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in Lincoln Educational Services implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price

  • 53% of the business is held by the top 10 shareholders

  • Insiders have been selling lately

A look at the shareholders of Lincoln Educational Services Corporation (NASDAQ:LINC) can tell us which group is most powerful. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 63% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

Because institutional owners have a huge pool of resources and liquidity, their investing decisions tend to carry a great deal of weight, especially with individual investors. Hence, having a considerable amount of institutional money invested in a company is often regarded as a desirable trait.

ADVERTISEMENT

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Lincoln Educational Services.

View our latest analysis for Lincoln Educational Services

ownership-breakdown
ownership-breakdown

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Lincoln Educational Services?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

Lincoln Educational Services already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Lincoln Educational Services, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

earnings-and-revenue-growth
earnings-and-revenue-growth

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. It would appear that 11% of Lincoln Educational Services shares are controlled by hedge funds. That's interesting, because hedge funds can be quite active and activist. Many look for medium term catalysts that will drive the share price higher. Our data shows that Juniper Investment Company, LLC is the largest shareholder with 11% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 7.5% and 5.5% of the stock. In addition, we found that Scott Shaw, the CEO has 3.4% of the shares allocated to their name.

We did some more digging and found that 10 of the top shareholders account for roughly 53% of the register, implying that along with larger shareholders, there are a few smaller shareholders, thereby balancing out each others interests somewhat.

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

Insider Ownership Of Lincoln Educational Services

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

We can report that insiders do own shares in Lincoln Educational Services Corporation. It has a market capitalization of just US$363m, and insiders have US$26m worth of shares, in their own names. Some would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. But it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

General Public Ownership

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 13% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

Private Company Ownership

Our data indicates that Private Companies hold 5.0%, of the company's shares. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.

Next Steps:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For example, we've discovered 3 warning signs for Lincoln Educational Services (2 are a bit concerning!) that you should be aware of before investing here.

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.