Advertisement
UK markets closed
  • FTSE 100

    8,237.72
    -34.74 (-0.42%)
     
  • FTSE 250

    20,442.35
    -56.37 (-0.27%)
     
  • AIM

    772.57
    +0.19 (+0.02%)
     
  • GBP/EUR

    1.1822
    +0.0000 (+0.00%)
     
  • GBP/USD

    1.2650
    -0.0010 (-0.08%)
     
  • Bitcoin GBP

    50,923.68
    +214.26 (+0.42%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    1,351.98
    -8.34 (-0.61%)
     
  • S&P 500

    5,464.62
    -8.55 (-0.16%)
     
  • DOW

    39,150.33
    +15.57 (+0.04%)
     
  • CRUDE OIL

    80.59
    -0.70 (-0.86%)
     
  • GOLD FUTURES

    2,334.70
    -34.30 (-1.45%)
     
  • NIKKEI 225

    38,596.47
    -36.55 (-0.09%)
     
  • HANG SENG

    18,028.52
    -306.80 (-1.67%)
     
  • DAX

    18,163.52
    -90.66 (-0.50%)
     
  • CAC 40

    7,628.57
    -42.77 (-0.56%)
     

With a 73% stake, Pan-United Corporation Ltd (SGX:P52) insiders have a lot riding on the company

Key Insights

  • Significant insider control over Pan-United implies vested interests in company growth

  • A total of 3 investors have a majority stake in the company with 64% ownership

  • Using data from company's past performance alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Pan-United Corporation Ltd (SGX:P52), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. With 73% stake, individual insiders possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

With such a notable stake in the company, insiders would be highly incentivised to make value accretive decisions.

ADVERTISEMENT

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Pan-United.

View our latest analysis for Pan-United

ownership-breakdown
ownership-breakdown

What Does The Lack Of Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Pan-United?

Institutional investors often avoid companies that are too small, too illiquid or too risky for their tastes. But it's unusual to see larger companies without any institutional investors.

There are many reasons why a company might not have any institutions on the share registry. It may be hard for institutions to buy large amounts of shares, if liquidity (the amount of shares traded each day) is low. If the company has not needed to raise capital, institutions might lack the opportunity to build a position. Alternatively, there might be something about the company that has kept institutional investors away. Institutional investors may not find the historic growth of the business impressive, or there might be other factors at play. You can see the past revenue performance of Pan-United, for yourself, below.

earnings-and-revenue-growth
earnings-and-revenue-growth

Hedge funds don't have many shares in Pan-United. Han Whatt Ng is currently the largest shareholder, with 23% of shares outstanding. The second and third largest shareholders are Bee Kiok Ng and Bee Bee Ng, with an equal amount of shares to their name at 21%. Bee Bee Ng, who is the third-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Member of the Board of Directors.

A more detailed study of the shareholder registry showed us that 3 of the top shareholders have a considerable amount of ownership in the company, via their 64% stake.

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There is some analyst coverage of the stock, but it could still become more well known, with time.

Insider Ownership Of Pan-United

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

It seems that insiders own more than half the Pan-United Corporation Ltd stock. This gives them a lot of power. Given it has a market cap of S$324m, that means they have S$235m worth of shares. Most would argue this is a positive, showing strong alignment with shareholders. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

General Public Ownership

With a 27% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Pan-United. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

Next Steps:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Be aware that Pan-United is showing 1 warning sign in our investment analysis , you should know about...

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.