UK markets close in 1 hour 6 minutes
  • FTSE 100

    7,077.27
    +14.98 (+0.21%)
     
  • FTSE 250

    22,618.96
    +161.88 (+0.72%)
     
  • AIM

    1,220.49
    -0.52 (-0.04%)
     
  • GBP/EUR

    1.1682
    -0.0006 (-0.05%)
     
  • GBP/USD

    1.3909
    -0.0024 (-0.17%)
     
  • BTC-GBP

    21,209.73
    -2,372.66 (-10.06%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    699.39
    -94.94 (-11.95%)
     
  • S&P 500

    4,229.16
    +4.37 (+0.10%)
     
  • DOW

    33,845.08
    -31.89 (-0.09%)
     
  • CRUDE OIL

    73.84
    +0.18 (+0.24%)
     
  • GOLD FUTURES

    1,777.30
    -5.60 (-0.31%)
     
  • NIKKEI 225

    28,884.13
    +873.20 (+3.12%)
     
  • HANG SENG

    28,309.76
    -179.24 (-0.63%)
     
  • DAX

    15,601.31
    -1.93 (-0.01%)
     
  • CAC 40

    6,596.56
    -5.98 (-0.09%)
     

AGL takes Greenpeace to court over use of its logo in ‘biggest climate polluter’ campaign

·2-min read
<span>Photograph: Melanie Burton/Reuters</span>
Photograph: Melanie Burton/Reuters

Energy giant AGL has launched legal action against Greenpeace Australia Pacific over a campaign that targets the company as Australia’s biggest corporate greenhouse gas emitter.

It comes after the environment group launched a report and campaign with posters and online advertising that feature AGL’s logo and phrases such as “generating pollution for generations” and “Still Australia’s biggest climate polluter”.

AGL has commenced legal proceedings in the federal court and is seeking to have its logos removed from the campaign, alleging copyright infringement.

Related: Victoria blocks AGL's gas terminal on environmental grounds

Greenpeace Australia Pacific has labelled the legal bid an attempt to stifle organisations that highlight the damage fossil fuel companies are causing to the climate.

The environment group said it would argue it is fair use of the logo because the campaign featured it for the purpose of satirical criticism “of the dissonance between AGL’s public relations statements and its lack of action on climate change”.

A directions hearing is set down for Tuesday.

AGL has rejected the suggestion it is seeking to shut down public debate.

“AGL reserves its rights to defend its brand under Australian law,” a spokesman said.

“We have no intention to stifle public debate. The legal application seeks to prevent unlawful use of our brand as part of a third party campaign and is not intended to silence the campaign itself.”

Katrina Bullock, the general counsel for Greenpeace Australia Pacific, said the case could be important in determining the extent to which charities and non-government organisations could run campaigns of the kind launched by Greenpeace “without fearing litigation”.

“Legal tactics like the ones AGL are using are the kind of tactic multibillion-dollar fossil fuel companies use … to try to tie up the resources of anyone who speaks out against them,” she said.

Related: AGL says it will link bosses’ bonuses to lowering emissions

Glenn Walker, the senior campaigner for Greenpeace Australia Pacific, said the legal bid was an attempt to sink the environment group’s campaign but “the truth is on our side”.

“AGL likes to slap a wind turbine on their ads to hide their dirty coal pollution, and now they’re trying to slap a lawsuit on us to keep us quiet,” he said.

“This is yet another attempt by the coal industry to stop grassroots organisations from exposing the damage that it is doing to the climate, to the environment and to human health.”

AGL is Australia’s largest corporate greenhouse gas emitter, reporting more than 40m tonnes of scope 1 emissions in 2019-20, more than double the next largest emitter.

Last year, AGL announced it would begin linking executive bonuses to lowering emissions from the start of the 2021-22 financial year.

Our goal is to create a safe and engaging place for users to connect over interests and passions. In order to improve our community experience, we are temporarily suspending article commenting