UK Markets close in 16 mins
  • FTSE 100

    7,036.23
    -42.19 (-0.60%)
     
  • FTSE 250

    22,970.24
    -80.22 (-0.35%)
     
  • AIM

    1,247.47
    +0.20 (+0.02%)
     
  • GBP/EUR

    1.1725
    -0.0012 (-0.11%)
     
  • GBP/USD

    1.3908
    -0.0050 (-0.3560%)
     
  • BTC-GBP

    28,004.83
    -966.80 (-3.34%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    923.82
    -26.08 (-2.75%)
     
  • S&P 500

    4,403.10
    -16.05 (-0.36%)
     
  • DOW

    35,040.07
    -44.46 (-0.13%)
     
  • CRUDE OIL

    73.53
    -0.09 (-0.12%)
     
  • GOLD FUTURES

    1,825.50
    -10.30 (-0.56%)
     
  • NIKKEI 225

    27,283.59
    -498.83 (-1.80%)
     
  • HANG SENG

    25,961.03
    -354.29 (-1.35%)
     
  • DAX

    15,568.71
    -71.76 (-0.46%)
     
  • CAC 40

    6,621.02
    -12.75 (-0.19%)
     

Alexander Vindman's Wife Takes Down Marco Rubio Over Idiotic Biden Dig

·2-min read

The wife of whistleblower Lt. Col. Alexander Vindman wasn’t having it when Rep. Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) tried to troll President Joe Biden with a Ukraine dig that was completely inaccurate.

Following a report in Politico — that has been denied by the White House — that security assistance to Ukraine had been frozen by the Biden administration, Rubio snarked: “Remember when freezing military aid to Ukraine was an impeachable offense?”

To view this content, you'll need to update your privacy settings.
Please click here to do so.

Rubio may have been joking, but clearly Donald Trump’s impeachment concerned far more than holding up military aid to Ukraine. It involved freezing weapons and aid from the U.S. until Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelensky agreed to do a personal political favor for Trump — launch an investigation into baseless accusations against a political rival. Vindman testified to that during Trump’s impeachment hearings and was later fired from the National Security Council for telling the truth.

“I suspected it was illegal, but I knew immediately that it was wrong and my duty was to report it,” Vindman said in an interview last year. 

 

Rachel Vindman was happy to point out the difference to Rubio. 

“Oh no you don’t,” she snapped on Twitter. “What was impeachable was the attempted extortion. You’re so bad at this; you can’t even troll well.”

To view this content, you'll need to update your privacy settings.
Please click here to do so.

Alexander Vindman also responded, though a bit more gently than his wife.

To view this content, you'll need to update your privacy settings.
Please click here to do so.

Other Rubio critics got into the spirit of Rachel Vindman’s attack. “Bless your little heart,” slyly noted one. To have a “quid pro quo” extortion, you “need a quid AND a quo, not just one of either.”

To view this content, you'll need to update your privacy settings.
Please click here to do so.
To view this content, you'll need to update your privacy settings.
Please click here to do so.
To view this content, you'll need to update your privacy settings.
Please click here to do so.

No rejoinder yet from Rubio.

Also on HuffPost

This article originally appeared on HuffPost and has been updated.

Our goal is to create a safe and engaging place for users to connect over interests and passions. In order to improve our community experience, we are temporarily suspending article commenting