UK Markets open in 4 hrs 51 mins
  • NIKKEI 225

    29,025.57
    +150.34 (+0.52%)
     
  • HANG SENG

    29,020.82
    +138.36 (+0.48%)
     
  • CRUDE OIL

    73.47
    +0.17 (+0.23%)
     
  • GOLD FUTURES

    1,777.60
    +0.90 (+0.05%)
     
  • DOW

    34,196.82
    +322.58 (+0.95%)
     
  • BTC-GBP

    25,190.81
    +1,668.30 (+7.09%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    844.02
    +57.40 (+7.30%)
     
  • Nasdaq

    14,369.71
    +97.98 (+0.69%)
     
  • ^FTAS

    4,051.12
    +11.72 (+0.29%)
     

Victory for Amazon as court scraps EU's €250m tax ruling

  • Oops!
    Something went wrong.
    Please try again later.
  • Oops!
    Something went wrong.
    Please try again later.
  • Oops!
    Something went wrong.
    Please try again later.
  • Oops!
    Something went wrong.
    Please try again later.
Amazon logistics centre at Passo Corese in Rome, Italy. Photo: Marco Ravagli/Barcroft Media via Getty Images
Amazon logistics centre at Passo Corese in Rome, Italy. Photo: Marco Ravagli/Barcroft Media via Getty Images

The European Court of Justice has scrapped an earlier decision made by the European Commission (EC) in 2017 that stated Amazon (AMZN) has to pay Luxembourg €250m (£214m, $303m) in unpaid taxes.

"The contested decision should be annulled in its entirety," the court said on Wednesday.

"The commission did not prove to the requisite legal standard that there was an undue reduction of the tax burden of a European subsidiary of the Amazon group," it added.

The EC had earlier said it found that over the period May 2006 to June 2014, the Grand Duchy allowed the retail giant to move a big chunk of its profits from a subsidiary to a holding company without paying tax.

WATCH: Amazon wins court fight over $300m EU tax order

“Luxembourg gave illegal tax benefits to Amazon. As a result, almost three quarters of Amazon’s profits were not taxed,” the EU’s competition commissioner Margrethe Vestager said in an October 2017 statement.

Amazon then appealed the EC ruling, saying its case contained legal and factual errors.

Among Amazon’s arguments was that the deal was agreed with Luxembourg in 2003, which meant the 10-year limitation period had expired.

At the time, Amazon said it did "not receive any special treatment from Luxembourg and that we paid tax in full accordance with both Luxembourg and international tax law."

Read more: Historic post-Brexit shift as UK's EU imports overtaken by rest of the world

Separately, the court upheld the EU's verdict that French energy giant Engie must repay Luxembourg €120m in taxes.

Both cases comes in the wake of revelations in 2014 that revealed Luxembourg made deals with hundreds of companies, guaranteeing them super low tax bills.

Earlier this week, a decision of the EC requiring Fiat Chrysler to repay about €30m to Luxembourg was appealed by the Irish government, a third party in this case.

Last year, Apple (AAPL) won an appeal in the same court against the European Commission's order in 2016 that Apple repay Ireland €13bn.

Watch: Inside the Amazon empire of billionaire Bezos 

Our goal is to create a safe and engaging place for users to connect over interests and passions. In order to improve our community experience, we are temporarily suspending article commenting