Advertisement
UK markets open in 6 hours 12 minutes
  • NIKKEI 225

    40,907.19
    -6.46 (-0.02%)
     
  • HANG SENG

    18,028.28
    +49.71 (+0.28%)
     
  • CRUDE OIL

    84.05
    +0.17 (+0.20%)
     
  • GOLD FUTURES

    2,369.40
    0.00 (0.00%)
     
  • DOW

    39,308.00
    -23.90 (-0.06%)
     
  • Bitcoin GBP

    44,695.68
    -2,592.34 (-5.48%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    1,190.85
    -70.33 (-5.58%)
     
  • NASDAQ Composite

    18,188.30
    +159.54 (+0.88%)
     
  • UK FTSE All Share

    4,497.97
    +34.88 (+0.78%)
     

Athletics' request to get involved in Nevada court case involving Vegas stadium is denied

A rendering of the Athletics' planned $1.5 billion stadium in Las Vegas that shows five overlapping layers
A rendering of a proposed Las Vegas stadium design for the Athletics. The Athletics' request to intervene in a Nevada court case in an effort to protect their interests in Las Vegas was denied. (Negativ via the Associated Press)

In February, the Oakland Athletics asked a Nevada court for permission to get involved in a lawsuit between a state teachers' union and the state itself. At issue: Did legislators violate the state constitution when they awarded $380 million in public funding to the A's for a new Las Vegas ballpark?

The court denied the A's request, saying the state can handle the matter on its own.

"The presence of [the A's], a private party that only represents its own presumably profit-driven interests, will unduly expand the controversy," District Judge Kristin Luis wrote in a ruling issued last week.

ADVERTISEMENT

The A's had argued they needed to intervene because "millions of dollars" would be at risk if the A's did not satisfy the development timelines enacted in SB1, the legislation that authorized the public financing. However, Luis wrote that the A's intervention would be "likely to cause delay and increased costs" in resolving the litigation.

Read more: Shaikin: A's want to intervene in Nevada case. For their proposed Vegas stadium, time is money

She also wrote that the team's interests would be represented by the state and associated local agencies, all of whom want the stadium built.

"The existing government defendants have the same ultimate objective as [the A's] — persuading this court that, contrary to plaintiffs' allegations, SB1 is constitutional," Luis wrote.

The court has not yet set a hearing date to consider the state's request to throw out the case, although both sides have filed formal arguments.

The Las Vegas Stadium Authority is expected to discuss progress on the proposed stadium at its regularly scheduled meeting July 18. Under SB1, the authorization for the public funding could expire if the if the A’s have not executed a development agreement and lease agreement within 18 months of MLB relocation approval, which was granted eight months ago.

The stadium, targeted for opening in 2028, is budgeted at $1.5 billion. A's owner John Fisher is responsible for financing for all but the $380 million of public funding.

Sign up for the L.A. Times SoCal high school sports newsletter to get scores, stories and a behind-the-scenes look at what makes prep sports so popular.

This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.