UK Markets open in 5 hrs 35 mins
  • NIKKEI 225

    -590.79 (-2.18%)

    0.00 (0.00%)

    +0.31 (+0.39%)

    -7.20 (-0.43%)
  • DOW

    -486.29 (-1.62%)

    -186.41 (-1.03%)
  • CMC Crypto 200

    -12.45 (-2.80%)
  • Nasdaq

    -198.87 (-1.80%)
  • ^FTAS

    -76.23 (-1.94%)

Celtic (LON:CCP) Has Debt But No Earnings; Should You Worry?

·4-min read

Howard Marks put it nicely when he said that, rather than worrying about share price volatility, 'The possibility of permanent loss is the risk I worry about... and every practical investor I know worries about.' So it seems the smart money knows that debt - which is usually involved in bankruptcies - is a very important factor, when you assess how risky a company is. We note that Celtic plc (LON:CCP) does have debt on its balance sheet. But the more important question is: how much risk is that debt creating?

Why Does Debt Bring Risk?

Generally speaking, debt only becomes a real problem when a company can't easily pay it off, either by raising capital or with its own cash flow. In the worst case scenario, a company can go bankrupt if it cannot pay its creditors. While that is not too common, we often do see indebted companies permanently diluting shareholders because lenders force them to raise capital at a distressed price. Of course, the upside of debt is that it often represents cheap capital, especially when it replaces dilution in a company with the ability to reinvest at high rates of return. When we examine debt levels, we first consider both cash and debt levels, together.

See our latest analysis for Celtic

How Much Debt Does Celtic Carry?

As you can see below, Celtic had UK£6.44m of debt at December 2021, down from UK£7.75m a year prior. But it also has UK£27.8m in cash to offset that, meaning it has UK£21.4m net cash.


How Healthy Is Celtic's Balance Sheet?

The latest balance sheet data shows that Celtic had liabilities of UK£52.5m due within a year, and liabilities of UK£16.3m falling due after that. On the other hand, it had cash of UK£27.8m and UK£24.7m worth of receivables due within a year. So it has liabilities totalling UK£16.3m more than its cash and near-term receivables, combined.

Of course, Celtic has a market capitalization of UK£125.2m, so these liabilities are probably manageable. However, we do think it is worth keeping an eye on its balance sheet strength, as it may change over time. While it does have liabilities worth noting, Celtic also has more cash than debt, so we're pretty confident it can manage its debt safely. The balance sheet is clearly the area to focus on when you are analysing debt. But it is future earnings, more than anything, that will determine Celtic's ability to maintain a healthy balance sheet going forward. So if you're focused on the future you can check out this free report showing analyst profit forecasts.

Over 12 months, Celtic reported revenue of UK£73m, which is a gain of 27%, although it did not report any earnings before interest and tax. Shareholders probably have their fingers crossed that it can grow its way to profits.

So How Risky Is Celtic?

While Celtic lost money on an earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) level, it actually booked a paper profit of UK£17m. So when you consider it has net cash, along with the statutory profit, the stock probably isn't as risky as it might seem, at least in the short term. One positive is that Celtic is growing revenue apace, which makes it easier to sell a growth story and raise capital if need be. But that doesn't change our opinion that the stock is risky. When analysing debt levels, the balance sheet is the obvious place to start. However, not all investment risk resides within the balance sheet - far from it. To that end, you should learn about the 3 warning signs we've spotted with Celtic (including 1 which doesn't sit too well with us) .

At the end of the day, it's often better to focus on companies that are free from net debt. You can access our special list of such companies (all with a track record of profit growth). It's free.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at)

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.