Advertisement
UK markets open in 7 hours 28 minutes
  • NIKKEI 225

    38,460.08
    +907.92 (+2.42%)
     
  • HANG SENG

    17,201.27
    +372.34 (+2.21%)
     
  • CRUDE OIL

    82.81
    0.00 (0.00%)
     
  • GOLD FUTURES

    2,329.50
    -8.90 (-0.38%)
     
  • DOW

    38,460.92
    -42.77 (-0.11%)
     
  • Bitcoin GBP

    51,389.49
    -1,865.09 (-3.50%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    1,385.89
    -38.21 (-2.69%)
     
  • NASDAQ Composite

    15,712.75
    +16.11 (+0.10%)
     
  • UK FTSE All Share

    4,374.06
    -4.69 (-0.11%)
     

The colleague we all know who looks busy while doing nothing

Working hard or hardly working? Photo: <span>imageBROKER/REX/Shutterstock</span>
Working hard or hardly working? Photo: imageBROKER/REX/Shutterstock

Researchers have identified a type of employee who “games the system” by managing to appear busy and successful without actually doing anything useful.

A productivity study by the Ashridge at Hult International Business School in Hertfordshire, UK, examined how engaged employees were at 28 organisations in the transport, health, government and charity sectors.

It found both highly-engaged and disengaged workers, but researchers were left puzzled that one in five teams had a poor level of output despite appearing to be made up of hard-working and enthusiastic staff members.

They discovered that some employees initially identified as highly-engaged were actually “pseudo-engaged” people, who dragged down productivity by pretending to be busier than they were.

ADVERTISEMENT

READ MORE: Why having a parasitic colleague isn’t always a negative

These “self-promoters” appeared to constantly be in meetings, taking important calls or having work-related discussions, but rarely accomplished any tasks. In shift work, this meant stretching out work to take up more time in order to fill up the work day with minimal effort.

Researchers found “low levels of trust and cohesion” with “little evidence of collegiality or support for one another” in these workplaces, despite an outward appearance of respect and commitment to company goals.

According to senior researcher Amy Armstrong, “selfish” staff have a negative impact on businesses but are often enabled by the managerial system, as self-promoting to the detriment of the collective means these individuals are more likely to climb the corporate ladder.

They are often the first to get promotions, better pay and bonuses because they “manage upwards” by making themselves look good in front of superiors.

READ MORE: How “horizontal” structures can cause toxic workplaces

This diminishes teamwork in the workplace because staff who make themselves look good in meetings are likely to benefit more than than colleges who actually do the work.

“They’re rewarded for that dysfunctional behaviour,” said Dr Armstrong. “It’s quite a depressing picture.”

For more on work and management issues, listen to the latest episode of Yahoo Finance Presents: It’s a Jungle Out There on Apple Podcasts, ACast or Google podcasts.