Advertisement
UK markets closed
  • FTSE 100

    7,895.85
    +18.80 (+0.24%)
     
  • FTSE 250

    19,391.30
    -59.37 (-0.31%)
     
  • AIM

    745.67
    +0.38 (+0.05%)
     
  • GBP/EUR

    1.1607
    -0.0076 (-0.65%)
     
  • GBP/USD

    1.2370
    -0.0068 (-0.55%)
     
  • Bitcoin GBP

    51,604.84
    +670.98 (+1.32%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    1,375.94
    +63.32 (+4.83%)
     
  • S&P 500

    4,967.23
    -43.89 (-0.88%)
     
  • DOW

    37,986.40
    +211.02 (+0.56%)
     
  • CRUDE OIL

    83.24
    +0.51 (+0.62%)
     
  • GOLD FUTURES

    2,406.70
    +8.70 (+0.36%)
     
  • NIKKEI 225

    37,068.35
    -1,011.35 (-2.66%)
     
  • HANG SENG

    16,224.14
    -161.73 (-0.99%)
     
  • DAX

    17,737.36
    -100.04 (-0.56%)
     
  • CAC 40

    8,022.41
    -0.85 (-0.01%)
     

Coronavirus: Leicester lockdown 'unnecessary' if data had been known earlier, says city's mayor

Leicester's mayor has criticised the government for only recently providing data that he claims could have prevented the city's lockdown "ever being necessary".

Sir Peter Soulsby told Sky News' Kay Burley @ Breakfast show that he felt "angry and frustrated".

The government is set to review added restrictions imposed on Leicester - which has witnessed the UK's first full local coronavirus lockdown - later on Thursday.

Shops and schools in Leicester have been forced to close again, while the reopening of pubs and restaurants did not take place in the city in line with the rest of England earlier this month.

ADVERTISEMENT

Sir Peter said he did not expect to be informed of the results of the government's review until it is publicly announced.

"It will be a political decision that will take us out, the same way it was a political decision that brought us into lockdown," said the Labour politician.

"I'm just very angry and frustrated because we've now, well into the lockdown, begun to get some data from the government that actually shows where the virus is and where it isn't in the city.

"We've been asking for this for weeks."

He said the data shows the infections are mostly "in perhaps some 10% of neighbourhoods of the city and the remaining 90% is very largely free of it," he added.

"If we had this before, we could have used it to intervene - as Blackburn and other places are using it to intervene now - with those neighbourhoods to prevent the lockdown ever being necessary."

Sir Peter said the 10% of Leicester's neighbourhoods where COVID-19 infections are high had been joined by a "very angry and very frustrated 90%".

There have been claims that clothing factories in Leicester, many of whom supply major online retailers, risked spreading COVID-19 by failing to implement additional hygiene or social distancing measures during the pandemic.

There have also been allegations that some factories told staff to continue to go into work despite being ill.

In addition, specialist National Crime Agency officers and Leicestershire Police have visited a number of businesses recently to investigate allegations of modern slavery and human trafficking.

But Sir Peter told Sky News there is "no evidence whatsoever" to show coronavirus was being transmitted in clothing factories.

:: Listen to the Daily podcast on Apple Podcasts, Google Podcasts, Spotify, Spreaker

"There's nothing in the data that suggests it is transmitting in places of work," he said.

"There are issues with those particular places of work, but they are quite separate to this and ones that need to be tackled and have needed to be tackled for some four or five years while we've been asking the government to take the issue seriously."

Sir Peter said data pointed to higher rates of COVID-19 infections in Leicester in "areas of inner city terraced housing with high densities of population".

But he revealed even in neighbouring streets there were "differing issues", adding: "In some streets no issue at all, in other streets nearby you've got a major issue.

"We needed to know that at the time so we could intervene with pinpoint accuracy to make sure we were dealing with those issues while we still could, rather than this blanket political-led lockdown over the whole of our city."

Health officials are understood to be very cautious when drawing conclusions from coronavirus data, with a person's residence not taking into account where people might mix in a city.

For example, several outbreaks at workplaces have not been within areas with the highest transmission.

Sir Peter, a former MP, has faced calls to resign as mayor over visits he made to his partner's house during lockdown.

He told Sky News he had "mistakenly judged" the visits were acceptable.

"After many weeks of being apart I went to help somebody who was desperately, desperately distressed and went for a very limited period of time and left," he said.

"Yes, of course, I shouldn't have broken the rules in that way."

Earlier this week, Health Secretary Matt Hancock told the House of Commons that the number of coronavirus cases in Leicester were "still well above" the rest of the UK.

Responding to Sir Peter's comments, a Department of Health and Social Care spokesperson said: "As this data confirms, coronavirus cases in Leicester were significantly higher than other parts of the country - and we took clear and decisive action to save lives.

"We are working closely with the local authorities to ensure that these measures are only in place as long as is necessary, and we will set out the next steps by 18 July."