Advertisement
UK markets close in 5 hours 47 minutes
  • FTSE 100

    8,085.96
    +45.58 (+0.57%)
     
  • FTSE 250

    19,723.41
    +4.04 (+0.02%)
     
  • AIM

    755.03
    +0.34 (+0.05%)
     
  • GBP/EUR

    1.1671
    +0.0026 (+0.23%)
     
  • GBP/USD

    1.2521
    +0.0059 (+0.47%)
     
  • Bitcoin GBP

    51,055.84
    -1,967.04 (-3.71%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    1,363.72
    -18.85 (-1.36%)
     
  • S&P 500

    5,071.63
    +1.08 (+0.02%)
     
  • DOW

    38,460.92
    -42.77 (-0.11%)
     
  • CRUDE OIL

    82.81
    0.00 (0.00%)
     
  • GOLD FUTURES

    2,337.50
    -0.90 (-0.04%)
     
  • NIKKEI 225

    37,628.48
    -831.60 (-2.16%)
     
  • HANG SENG

    17,284.54
    +83.27 (+0.48%)
     
  • DAX

    17,982.20
    -106.50 (-0.59%)
     
  • CAC 40

    8,048.27
    -43.59 (-0.54%)
     

E-Gold Claims US Officials Buried Key Report in 2008 Landmark Crypto Ruling

A defunct digital currency project that was a precursor to bitcoin has claimed the U.S. government suppressed crucial evidence in a 2008 landmark case that has since shaped the cryptocurrency industry.

  • E-Gold’s former directors filed a petition Tuesday for a writ of coram nobis – in which the court changes the original judgment upon discovery of a fundamental error – at the District of Columbia court.

  • Founded in 1996, E-Gold allowed users to trade digital units backed by precious metals – at its peak, the company held around $85 million in gold.

  • The U.S. government charged E-Gold with being an unlicensed money transmitter in 2007; the project’s directors pleaded guilty in 2008.

  • The ex-directors now claim in court that the federal government unlawfully concealed a 2006 review from Florida’s Office for Financial Regulation (OFR) so they “could make an example” out of E-Gold.

  • Per the filing, the OFR review said E-Gold did not count as a money transmitter, as the gold-based asset was closer to a commodity than a fiat currency under state law.

  • E-Gold’s former directors claim the court’s judgment would have been substantially different had they been allowed access to the OFR review

  • The E-Gold case effectively extended the definition of “money transmitter” in the U.S. to include any system that stored and transferred value.

  • Many crypto businesses subsequently have had to be regulated as money transmitters in individual states if they want to operate legally in the U.S.

See the full filing below:

See also: Lessons From the First Digital Gold Boom

Related Stories