UK markets closed
  • NIKKEI 225

    28,930.11
    -628.99 (-2.13%)
     
  • HANG SENG

    29,236.79
    -643.63 (-2.15%)
     
  • CRUDE OIL

    63.84
    +2.56 (+4.18%)
     
  • GOLD FUTURES

    1,694.30
    -21.50 (-1.25%)
     
  • DOW

    30,898.13
    -371.96 (-1.19%)
     
  • BTC-GBP

    34,770.19
    -2,233.29 (-6.04%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    968.98
    -18.23 (-1.85%)
     
  • ^IXIC

    12,748.01
    -249.74 (-1.92%)
     
  • ^FTAS

    3,792.09
    -16.15 (-0.42%)
     

Should You Be Impressed By Hanesbrands Inc.'s (NYSE:HBI) ROE?

Simply Wall St
·4-min read

While some investors are already well versed in financial metrics (hat tip), this article is for those who would like to learn about Return On Equity (ROE) and why it is important. To keep the lesson grounded in practicality, we'll use ROE to better understand Hanesbrands Inc. (NYSE:HBI).

Return on equity or ROE is a key measure used to assess how efficiently a company's management is utilizing the company's capital. In simpler terms, it measures the profitability of a company in relation to shareholder's equity.

See our latest analysis for Hanesbrands

How To Calculate Return On Equity?

ROE can be calculated by using the formula:

Return on Equity = Net Profit (from continuing operations) ÷ Shareholders' Equity

So, based on the above formula, the ROE for Hanesbrands is:

38% = US$442m ÷ US$1.1b (Based on the trailing twelve months to September 2020).

The 'return' is the amount earned after tax over the last twelve months. Another way to think of that is that for every $1 worth of equity, the company was able to earn $0.38 in profit.

Does Hanesbrands Have A Good Return On Equity?

Arguably the easiest way to assess company's ROE is to compare it with the average in its industry. Importantly, this is far from a perfect measure, because companies differ significantly within the same industry classification. As you can see in the graphic below, Hanesbrands has a higher ROE than the average (16%) in the Luxury industry.

roe
roe

That's clearly a positive. With that said, a high ROE doesn't always indicate high profitability. Especially when a firm uses high levels of debt to finance its debt which may boost its ROE but the high leverage puts the company at risk. To know the 3 risks we have identified for Hanesbrands visit our risks dashboard for free.

Why You Should Consider Debt When Looking At ROE

Most companies need money -- from somewhere -- to grow their profits. The cash for investment can come from prior year profits (retained earnings), issuing new shares, or borrowing. In the case of the first and second options, the ROE will reflect this use of cash, for growth. In the latter case, the use of debt will improve the returns, but will not change the equity. In this manner the use of debt will boost ROE, even though the core economics of the business stay the same.

Combining Hanesbrands' Debt And Its 38% Return On Equity

We think Hanesbrands uses a significant amount of debt to maximize its returns, as it has a significantly higher debt to equity ratio of 3.46. Its ROE is clearly quite good, but it seems to be boosted by the significant use of debt by the company.

Conclusion

Return on equity is one way we can compare its business quality of different companies. A company that can achieve a high return on equity without debt could be considered a high quality business. If two companies have around the same level of debt to equity, and one has a higher ROE, I'd generally prefer the one with higher ROE.

But when a business is high quality, the market often bids it up to a price that reflects this. The rate at which profits are likely to grow, relative to the expectations of profit growth reflected in the current price, must be considered, too. So you might want to check this FREE visualization of analyst forecasts for the company.

Of course, you might find a fantastic investment by looking elsewhere. So take a peek at this free list of interesting companies.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.