Advertisement
UK markets closed
  • NIKKEI 225

    40,074.69
    +443.63 (+1.12%)
     
  • HANG SENG

    17,769.14
    +50.53 (+0.29%)
     
  • CRUDE OIL

    83.14
    -0.24 (-0.29%)
     
  • GOLD FUTURES

    2,338.80
    -0.10 (-0.00%)
     
  • DOW

    39,331.85
    +162.33 (+0.41%)
     
  • Bitcoin GBP

    48,842.07
    -1,009.23 (-2.02%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    1,332.23
    -12.28 (-0.91%)
     
  • NASDAQ Composite

    18,028.76
    +149.46 (+0.84%)
     
  • UK FTSE All Share

    4,429.66
    -21.82 (-0.49%)
     

Individual investors account for 36% of Champion Iron Limited's (ASX:CIA) ownership, while institutions account for 29%

Key Insights

  • Significant control over Champion Iron by individual investors implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions

  • The top 12 shareholders own 50% of the company

  • Insider ownership in Champion Iron is 12%

If you want to know who really controls Champion Iron Limited (ASX:CIA), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. With 36% stake, individual investors possess the maximum shares in the company. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

Meanwhile, institutions make up 29% of the company’s shareholders. Large companies usually have institutions as shareholders, and we usually see insiders owning shares in smaller companies.

ADVERTISEMENT

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Champion Iron.

See our latest analysis for Champion Iron

ownership-breakdown
ownership-breakdown

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Champion Iron?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Champion Iron. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Champion Iron's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

earnings-and-revenue-growth
earnings-and-revenue-growth

Champion Iron is not owned by hedge funds. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is Investissement Québec, Investment Arm with 8.4% of shares outstanding. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 8.3% and 8.1% of the stock. William O’Keeffe, who is the second-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Top Key Executive.

A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 12 shareholders have a combined ownership of 50% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are a reasonable number of analysts covering the stock, so it might be useful to find out their aggregate view on the future.

Insider Ownership Of Champion Iron

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Company management run the business, but the CEO will answer to the board, even if he or she is a member of it.

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in Champion Iron Limited. It has a market capitalization of just AU$3.3b, and insiders have AU$390m worth of shares in their own names. That's quite significant. It is good to see this level of investment. You can check here to see if those insiders have been buying recently.

General Public Ownership

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 36% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

Private Equity Ownership

With an ownership of 8.4%, private equity firms are in a position to play a role in shaping corporate strategy with a focus on value creation. Some investors might be encouraged by this, since private equity are sometimes able to encourage strategies that help the market see the value in the company. Alternatively, those holders might be exiting the investment after taking it public.

Private Company Ownership

We can see that Private Companies own 16%, of the shares on issue. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.

Next Steps:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. For instance, we've identified 1 warning sign for Champion Iron that you should be aware of.

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com