Advertisement
UK markets close in 3 hours 52 minutes
  • FTSE 100

    8,210.06
    +37.91 (+0.46%)
     
  • FTSE 250

    20,070.10
    +17.77 (+0.09%)
     
  • AIM

    770.41
    +2.30 (+0.30%)
     
  • GBP/EUR

    1.1680
    -0.0003 (-0.02%)
     
  • GBP/USD

    1.2554
    +0.0021 (+0.17%)
     
  • Bitcoin GBP

    47,070.82
    +724.90 (+1.56%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    1,279.88
    +2.90 (+0.23%)
     
  • S&P 500

    5,064.20
    +45.81 (+0.91%)
     
  • DOW

    38,225.66
    +322.37 (+0.85%)
     
  • CRUDE OIL

    79.15
    +0.20 (+0.25%)
     
  • GOLD FUTURES

    2,308.10
    -1.50 (-0.06%)
     
  • NIKKEI 225

    38,236.07
    -37.98 (-0.10%)
     
  • HANG SENG

    18,475.92
    +268.79 (+1.48%)
     
  • DAX

    17,968.17
    +71.67 (+0.40%)
     
  • CAC 40

    7,955.16
    +40.51 (+0.51%)
     

Institutional investors in Mastercard Incorporated (NYSE:MA) see US$18b decrease in market cap last week, although long-term gains have benefitted them.

Key Insights

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in Mastercard implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price

  • A total of 18 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership

  • Ownership research along with analyst forecasts data help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock

A look at the shareholders of Mastercard Incorporated (NYSE:MA) can tell us which group is most powerful. With 88% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

No shareholder likes losing money on their investments, especially institutional investors who saw their holdings drop 4.0% in value last week. However, the 24% one-year returns may have helped alleviate their overall losses. They should, however, be mindful of further losses in the future.

ADVERTISEMENT

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Mastercard, beginning with the chart below.

See our latest analysis for Mastercard

ownership-breakdown
ownership-breakdown

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Mastercard?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

We can see that Mastercard does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Mastercard, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

earnings-and-revenue-growth
earnings-and-revenue-growth

Investors should note that institutions actually own more than half the company, so they can collectively wield significant power. Mastercard is not owned by hedge funds. Our data shows that The MasterCard Foundation, Endowment Arm is the largest shareholder with 10% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 8.1% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 7.2% by the third-largest shareholder.

Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 50% of the ownership is controlled by the top 18 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

Insider Ownership Of Mastercard

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

Our information suggests that Mastercard Incorporated insiders own under 1% of the company. It is a very large company, so it would be surprising to see insiders own a large proportion of the company. Though their holding amounts to less than 1%, we can see that board members collectively own US$183m worth of shares (at current prices). Arguably recent buying and selling is just as important to consider. You can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.

General Public Ownership

With a 11% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Mastercard. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

Next Steps:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For instance, we've identified 1 warning sign for Mastercard that you should be aware of.

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.