Advertisement
UK markets close in 1 hour 52 minutes
  • FTSE 100

    8,173.14
    +26.11 (+0.32%)
     
  • FTSE 250

    20,034.30
    -50.49 (-0.25%)
     
  • AIM

    763.57
    +0.24 (+0.03%)
     
  • GBP/EUR

    1.1698
    -0.0014 (-0.12%)
     
  • GBP/USD

    1.2528
    -0.0034 (-0.27%)
     
  • Bitcoin GBP

    50,119.69
    -539.11 (-1.06%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    1,305.71
    -33.36 (-2.49%)
     
  • S&P 500

    5,104.18
    -11.99 (-0.23%)
     
  • DOW

    38,241.75
    -144.34 (-0.38%)
     
  • CRUDE OIL

    82.20
    -0.43 (-0.52%)
     
  • GOLD FUTURES

    2,315.90
    -41.80 (-1.77%)
     
  • NIKKEI 225

    38,405.66
    +470.90 (+1.24%)
     
  • HANG SENG

    17,763.03
    +16.12 (+0.09%)
     
  • DAX

    18,016.05
    -102.27 (-0.56%)
     
  • CAC 40

    8,023.05
    -42.10 (-0.52%)
     

Institutional owners may consider drastic measures as Exelon Corporation's (NASDAQ:EXC) recent US$1.5b drop adds to long-term losses

Key Insights

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Exelon's stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions

  • The top 13 shareholders own 50% of the company

  • Using data from analyst forecasts alongside ownership research, one can better assess the future performance of a company

Every investor in Exelon Corporation (NASDAQ:EXC) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. With 85% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

And institutional investors endured the highest losses after the company's share price fell by 4.0% last week. Needless to say, the recent loss which further adds to the one-year loss to shareholders of 12% might not go down well especially with this category of shareholders. Also referred to as "smart money", institutions have a lot of sway over how a stock's price moves. Hence, if weakness in Exelon's share price continues, institutional investors may feel compelled to sell the stock, which might not be ideal for individual investors.

ADVERTISEMENT

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Exelon.

Check out our latest analysis for Exelon

ownership-breakdown
ownership-breakdown

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Exelon?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Exelon. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Exelon, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

earnings-and-revenue-growth
earnings-and-revenue-growth

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Exelon. Our data shows that The Vanguard Group, Inc. is the largest shareholder with 11% of shares outstanding. Wellington Management Group LLP is the second largest shareholder owning 9.3% of common stock, and BlackRock, Inc. holds about 9.0% of the company stock.

Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 50% of the ownership is controlled by the top 13 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

Insider Ownership Of Exelon

The definition of an insider can differ slightly between different countries, but members of the board of directors always count. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own less than 1% of Exelon Corporation. Being so large, we would not expect insiders to own a large proportion of the stock. Collectively, they own US$32m of stock. It is always good to see at least some insider ownership, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

General Public Ownership

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 15% stake in Exelon. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

Next Steps:

It's always worth thinking about the different groups who own shares in a company. But to understand Exelon better, we need to consider many other factors. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 2 warning signs with Exelon (at least 1 which can't be ignored) , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.