Advertisement
UK markets open in 4 hours 45 minutes
  • NIKKEI 225

    40,659.61
    +78.85 (+0.19%)
     
  • HANG SENG

    18,036.69
    +58.12 (+0.32%)
     
  • CRUDE OIL

    83.88
    0.00 (0.00%)
     
  • GOLD FUTURES

    2,369.40
    0.00 (0.00%)
     
  • DOW

    39,308.00
    -23.90 (-0.06%)
     
  • Bitcoin GBP

    46,056.39
    -2,111.08 (-4.38%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    1,229.05
    -105.87 (-7.93%)
     
  • NASDAQ Composite

    18,188.30
    +159.54 (+0.88%)
     
  • UK FTSE All Share

    4,463.09
    +33.43 (+0.75%)
     

Institutional owners may ignore Lyft, Inc.'s (NASDAQ:LYFT) recent US$564m market cap decline as longer-term profits stay in the green

Key Insights

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Lyft's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions

  • A total of 11 investors have a majority stake in the company with 50% ownership

  • Recent sales by insiders

Every investor in Lyft, Inc. (NASDAQ:LYFT) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are institutions with 76% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

Institutional investors was the group most impacted after the company's market cap fell to US$7.1b last week. However, the 80% one-year returns may have helped alleviate their overall losses. But they would probably be wary of future losses.

ADVERTISEMENT

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Lyft.

See our latest analysis for Lyft

ownership-breakdown
ownership-breakdown

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Lyft?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

We can see that Lyft does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Lyft, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

earnings-and-revenue-growth
earnings-and-revenue-growth

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Lyft. Our data shows that FMR LLC is the largest shareholder with 14% of shares outstanding. With 8.0% and 7.9% of the shares outstanding respectively, The Vanguard Group, Inc. and Rakuten Group, Inc. are the second and third largest shareholders.

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 11 have the combined ownership of 50% in the company, suggesting that no single shareholder has significant control over the company.

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

Insider Ownership Of Lyft

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own some shares in Lyft, Inc.. This is a big company, so it is good to see this level of alignment. Insiders own US$231m worth of shares (at current prices). If you would like to explore the question of insider alignment, you can click here to see if insiders have been buying or selling.

General Public Ownership

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 13% stake in Lyft. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

Public Company Ownership

We can see that public companies hold 7.9% of the Lyft shares on issue. It's hard to say for sure but this suggests they have entwined business interests. This might be a strategic stake, so it's worth watching this space for changes in ownership.

Next Steps:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. For instance, we've identified 3 warning signs for Lyft that you should be aware of.

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.