Advertisement
UK markets close in 30 minutes
  • FTSE 100

    8,136.09
    +57.23 (+0.71%)
     
  • FTSE 250

    19,813.94
    +211.96 (+1.08%)
     
  • AIM

    755.40
    +2.28 (+0.30%)
     
  • GBP/EUR

    1.1663
    +0.0007 (+0.06%)
     
  • GBP/USD

    1.2464
    -0.0047 (-0.38%)
     
  • Bitcoin GBP

    51,221.87
    +398.90 (+0.78%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    1,331.55
    -64.98 (-4.65%)
     
  • S&P 500

    5,104.42
    +56.00 (+1.11%)
     
  • DOW

    38,208.78
    +122.98 (+0.32%)
     
  • CRUDE OIL

    83.44
    -0.13 (-0.16%)
     
  • GOLD FUTURES

    2,344.00
    +1.50 (+0.06%)
     
  • NIKKEI 225

    37,934.76
    +306.28 (+0.81%)
     
  • HANG SENG

    17,651.15
    +366.61 (+2.12%)
     
  • DAX

    18,168.67
    +251.39 (+1.40%)
     
  • CAC 40

    8,104.02
    +87.37 (+1.09%)
     

Are Institutions Heavily Invested In African Gold Acquisition Corporation's (NYSE:AGAC) Shares?

A look at the shareholders of African Gold Acquisition Corporation (NYSE:AGAC) can tell us which group is most powerful. Generally speaking, as a company grows, institutions will increase their ownership. Conversely, insiders often decrease their ownership over time. Companies that have been privatized tend to have low insider ownership.

African Gold Acquisition is not a large company by global standards. It has a market capitalization of US$502m, which means it wouldn't have the attention of many institutional investors. Taking a look at our data on the ownership groups (below), it seems that institutions own shares in the company. We can zoom in on the different ownership groups, to learn more about African Gold Acquisition.

Check out our latest analysis for African Gold Acquisition

ownership-breakdown
ownership-breakdown

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About African Gold Acquisition?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

ADVERTISEMENT

African Gold Acquisition already has institutions on the share registry. Indeed, they own a respectable stake in the company. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of African Gold Acquisition, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

earnings-and-revenue-growth
earnings-and-revenue-growth

Since institutional investors own more than half the issued stock, the board will likely have to pay attention to their preferences. Hedge funds don't have many shares in African Gold Acquisition. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is African Gold Acquisition Sponsor LLC with 17% of shares outstanding. With 7.0% and 3.9% of the shares outstanding respectively, Karpus Management Inc. and Marshall Wace LLP are the second and third largest shareholders.

Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 50% of the ownership is controlled by the top 12 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. As far as we can tell there isn't analyst coverage of the company, so it is probably flying under the radar.

Insider Ownership Of African Gold Acquisition

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

We note our data does not show any board members holding shares, personally. It is unusual not to have at least some personal holdings by board members, so our data might be flawed. A good next step would be to check how much the CEO is paid.

General Public Ownership

With a 27% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over African Gold Acquisition. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

Private Company Ownership

We can see that Private Companies own 17%, of the shares on issue. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.

Next Steps:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. To that end, you should be aware of the 3 warning signs we've spotted with African Gold Acquisition .

Of course this may not be the best stock to buy. Therefore, you may wish to see our free collection of interesting prospects boasting favorable financials.

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.