Advertisement
UK markets closed
  • NIKKEI 225

    38,385.73
    +29.67 (+0.08%)
     
  • HANG SENG

    19,073.71
    -41.35 (-0.22%)
     
  • CRUDE OIL

    78.53
    +0.51 (+0.65%)
     
  • GOLD FUTURES

    2,393.90
    +34.00 (+1.44%)
     
  • DOW

    39,842.18
    +284.07 (+0.72%)
     
  • Bitcoin GBP

    51,339.61
    +3,066.30 (+6.35%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    1,374.58
    +106.63 (+8.41%)
     
  • NASDAQ Composite

    16,731.76
    +220.58 (+1.34%)
     
  • UK FTSE All Share

    4,596.71
    +13.48 (+0.29%)
     

Institutions own 25% of Cedar Woods Properties Limited (ASX:CWP) shares but retail investors control 49% of the company

Key Insights

  • Significant control over Cedar Woods Properties by retail investors implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions

  • The top 20 shareholders own 50% of the company

  • 14% of Cedar Woods Properties is held by insiders

A look at the shareholders of Cedar Woods Properties Limited (ASX:CWP) can tell us which group is most powerful. We can see that retail investors own the lion's share in the company with 49% ownership. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

Meanwhile, institutions make up 25% of the company’s shareholders. Institutions will often hold stock in bigger companies, and we expect to see insiders owning a noticeable percentage of the smaller ones.

ADVERTISEMENT

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Cedar Woods Properties.

View our latest analysis for Cedar Woods Properties

ownership-breakdown
ownership-breakdown

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Cedar Woods Properties?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Cedar Woods Properties. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Cedar Woods Properties' historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

earnings-and-revenue-growth
earnings-and-revenue-growth

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Cedar Woods Properties. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is Australian Super Pty Ltd with 11% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 10% and 5.1%, of the shares outstanding, respectively. William Hames, who is the second-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Top Key Executive.

Looking at the shareholder registry, we can see that 50% of the ownership is controlled by the top 20 shareholders, meaning that no single shareholder has a majority interest in the ownership.

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

Insider Ownership Of Cedar Woods Properties

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in Cedar Woods Properties Limited. Insiders have a AU$53m stake in this AU$391m business. We would say this shows alignment with shareholders, but it is worth noting that the company is still quite small; some insiders may have founded the business. You can click here to see if those insiders have been buying or selling.

General Public Ownership

With a 49% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Cedar Woods Properties. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

Private Company Ownership

It seems that Private Companies own 13%, of the Cedar Woods Properties stock. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.

Next Steps:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Be aware that Cedar Woods Properties is showing 3 warning signs in our investment analysis , and 1 of those shouldn't be ignored...

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.