Advertisement
UK markets close in 7 hours 4 minutes
  • FTSE 100

    8,359.68
    +5.63 (+0.07%)
     
  • FTSE 250

    20,486.75
    -5.24 (-0.03%)
     
  • AIM

    780.69
    +0.86 (+0.11%)
     
  • GBP/EUR

    1.1619
    -0.0003 (-0.03%)
     
  • GBP/USD

    1.2474
    -0.0024 (-0.19%)
     
  • Bitcoin GBP

    49,157.75
    -809.66 (-1.62%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    1,322.33
    +22.23 (+1.71%)
     
  • S&P 500

    5,187.67
    -0.03 (-0.00%)
     
  • DOW

    39,056.39
    +172.13 (+0.44%)
     
  • CRUDE OIL

    79.66
    +0.67 (+0.85%)
     
  • GOLD FUTURES

    2,319.40
    -2.90 (-0.12%)
     
  • NIKKEI 225

    38,073.98
    -128.39 (-0.34%)
     
  • HANG SENG

    18,537.81
    +223.95 (+1.22%)
     
  • DAX

    18,552.34
    +53.96 (+0.29%)
     
  • CAC 40

    8,128.79
    -2.62 (-0.03%)
     

An Intrinsic Calculation For Hochschild Mining plc (LON:HOC) Shows It’s 30.91% Undervalued

Today I will be providing a simple run through of a valuation method used to estimate the attractiveness of Hochschild Mining plc (LON:HOC) as an investment opportunity by taking the foreast future cash flows of the company and discounting them back to today’s value. I will be using the Discounted Cash Flows (DCF) model. It may sound complicated, but actually it is quite simple! If you want to learn more about discounted cash flow, the basis for my calcs can be read in detail in the Simply Wall St analysis model. Please also note that this article was written in June 2018 so be sure check out the updated calculation by following the link below. Check out our latest analysis for Hochschild Mining

The method

We are going to use a two-stage DCF model, which, as the name states, takes into account two stages of growth. The first stage is generally a higher growth period which levels off heading towards the terminal value, captured in the second ‘steady growth’ period. To start off with we need to estimate the next five years of cash flows. Where possible I use analyst estimates, but when these aren’t available I have extrapolated the previous free cash flow (FCF) from the year before. For this growth rate I used the average annual growth rate over the past five years, but capped at a reasonable level. I then discount the sum of these cash flows to arrive at a present value estimate.

5-year cash flow forecast

2018

2019

2020

2021

2022

Levered FCF ($, Millions)

$114.65

$171.10

$190.00

$190.72

$191.45

Source

Analyst x2

Analyst x4

Analyst x1

Extrapolated @ (0.38%)

Extrapolated @ (0.38%)

Present Value Discounted @ 10.93%

$103.36

$139.05

$139.20

$125.97

$113.99

Present Value of 5-year Cash Flow (PVCF)= UK£621.58m

ADVERTISEMENT

We now need to calculate the Terminal Value, which accounts for all the future cash flows after the five years. For a number of reasons a very conservative growth rate is used that cannot exceed that of the GDP. In this case I have used the 10-year government bond rate (1.4%). In the same way as with the 5-year ‘growth’ period, we discount this to today’s value at a cost of equity of 10.9%.

Terminal Value (TV) = FCF2022 × (1 + g) ÷ (r – g) = UK£191.45m × (1 + 1.4%) ÷ (10.9% – 1.4%) = UK£2.04b

Present Value of Terminal Value (PVTV) = TV / (1 + r)5 = UK£2.04b ÷ ( 1 + 10.9%)5 = UK£1.21b

The total value is the sum of cash flows for the next five years and the discounted terminal value, which results in the Total Equity Value, which in this case is UK£1.83b. To get the intrinsic value per share, we divide this by the total number of shares outstanding, or the equivalent number if this is a depositary receipt or ADR. This results in an intrinsic value in the company’s reported currency of $3.61. However, HOC’s primary listing is in United Kingdom, and 1 share of HOC in USD represents 0.753 ( USD/ GBP) share of LSE:HOC, so the intrinsic value per share in GBP is £2.72. Compared to the current share price of £1.88, the stock is quite undervalued at a 30.91% discount to what it is available for right now.

LSE:HOC Intrinsic Value June 27th 18
LSE:HOC Intrinsic Value June 27th 18

Important assumptions

The calculation above is very dependent on two assumptions. The first is the discount rate and the other is the cash flows. If you don’t agree with my result, have a go at the calculation yourself and play with the assumptions. Because we are looking at Hochschild Mining as potential shareholders, the cost of equity is used as the discount rate, rather than the cost of capital (or weighed average cost of capital, WACC) which accounts for debt. In this calculation I’ve used 10.9%, which is based on a levered beta of 1.108. This is derived from the Bottom-Up Beta method based on comparable companies, with an imposed limit between 0.8 and 2.0, which is a reasonable range for a stable business.

Next Steps:

Although the valuation of a company is important, it shouldn’t be the only metric you look at when researching a company. What is the reason for the share price to differ from the intrinsic value? For HOC, I’ve put together three key aspects you should look at:

  1. Financial Health: Does HOC have a healthy balance sheet? Take a look at our free balance sheet analysis with six simple checks on key factors like leverage and risk.

  2. Future Earnings: How does HOC’s growth rate compare to its peers and the wider market? Dig deeper into the analyst consensus number for the upcoming years by interacting with our free analyst growth expectation chart.

  3. Other High Quality Alternatives: Are there other high quality stocks you could be holding instead of HOC? Explore our interactive list of high quality stocks to get an idea of what else is out there you may be missing!

PS. Simply Wall St does a DCF calculation for every GB stock every 6 hours, so if you want to find the intrinsic value of any other stock just search here.


To help readers see pass the short term volatility of the financial market, we aim to bring you a long-term focused research analysis purely driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis does not factor in the latest price sensitive company announcements.

The author is an independent contributor and at the time of publication had no position in the stocks mentioned.