Advertisement
UK markets close in 1 hour 8 minutes
  • FTSE 100

    8,059.14
    +14.33 (+0.18%)
     
  • FTSE 250

    19,765.24
    -34.48 (-0.17%)
     
  • AIM

    754.79
    -0.08 (-0.01%)
     
  • GBP/EUR

    1.1629
    +0.0001 (+0.01%)
     
  • GBP/USD

    1.2445
    -0.0008 (-0.06%)
     
  • Bitcoin GBP

    53,018.24
    -745.48 (-1.39%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    1,428.01
    +3.91 (+0.27%)
     
  • S&P 500

    5,078.55
    +8.00 (+0.16%)
     
  • DOW

    38,474.05
    -29.64 (-0.08%)
     
  • CRUDE OIL

    82.94
    -0.42 (-0.50%)
     
  • GOLD FUTURES

    2,332.30
    -9.80 (-0.42%)
     
  • NIKKEI 225

    38,460.08
    +907.92 (+2.42%)
     
  • HANG SENG

    17,201.27
    +372.34 (+2.21%)
     
  • DAX

    18,134.78
    -2.87 (-0.02%)
     
  • CAC 40

    8,111.62
    +5.84 (+0.07%)
     

Intrusion (NASDAQ:INTZ) shareholders have earned a 48% CAGR over the last five years

Some Intrusion Inc. (NASDAQ:INTZ) shareholders are probably rather concerned to see the share price fall 61% over the last three months. But that doesn't undermine the fantastic longer term performance (measured over five years). To be precise, the stock price is 606% higher than it was five years ago, a wonderful performance by any measure. Arguably, the recent fall is to be expected after such a strong rise. Of course what matters most is whether the business can improve itself sustainably, thus justifying a higher price. Anyone who held for that rewarding ride would probably be keen to talk about it.

With that in mind, it's worth seeing if the company's underlying fundamentals have been the driver of long term performance, or if there are some discrepancies.

See our latest analysis for Intrusion

Because Intrusion made a loss in the last twelve months, we think the market is probably more focussed on revenue and revenue growth, at least for now. When a company doesn't make profits, we'd generally expect to see good revenue growth. Some companies are willing to postpone profitability to grow revenue faster, but in that case one does expect good top-line growth.

ADVERTISEMENT

For the last half decade, Intrusion can boast revenue growth at a rate of 8.3% per year. That's a fairly respectable growth rate. Arguably it's more than reflected in the very strong share price gain of 48% a year over a half a decade. It might not be cheap but a (long-term) growth stock like this is usually well worth taking a closer look at.

The graphic below depicts how earnings and revenue have changed over time (unveil the exact values by clicking on the image).

earnings-and-revenue-growth
earnings-and-revenue-growth

We consider it positive that insiders have made significant purchases in the last year. Having said that, most people consider earnings and revenue growth trends to be a more meaningful guide to the business. You can see what analysts are predicting for Intrusion in this interactive graph of future profit estimates.

A Different Perspective

Investors in Intrusion had a tough year, with a total loss of 68%, against a market gain of about 25%. Even the share prices of good stocks drop sometimes, but we want to see improvements in the fundamental metrics of a business, before getting too interested. Longer term investors wouldn't be so upset, since they would have made 48%, each year, over five years. If the fundamental data continues to indicate long term sustainable growth, the current sell-off could be an opportunity worth considering. While it is well worth considering the different impacts that market conditions can have on the share price, there are other factors that are even more important. To that end, you should be aware of the 4 warning signs we've spotted with Intrusion .

There are plenty of other companies that have insiders buying up shares. You probably do not want to miss this free list of growing companies that insiders are buying.

Please note, the market returns quoted in this article reflect the market weighted average returns of stocks that currently trade on US exchanges.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.