Advertisement
UK markets close in 7 hours 5 minutes
  • FTSE 100

    8,084.00
    +39.19 (+0.49%)
     
  • FTSE 250

    19,810.68
    +10.96 (+0.06%)
     
  • AIM

    756.10
    +1.23 (+0.16%)
     
  • GBP/EUR

    1.1628
    +0.0000 (+0.00%)
     
  • GBP/USD

    1.2430
    -0.0022 (-0.18%)
     
  • Bitcoin GBP

    53,569.51
    +336.22 (+0.63%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    1,436.54
    +12.44 (+0.87%)
     
  • S&P 500

    5,070.55
    +59.95 (+1.20%)
     
  • DOW

    38,503.69
    +263.71 (+0.69%)
     
  • CRUDE OIL

    83.43
    +0.07 (+0.08%)
     
  • GOLD FUTURES

    2,330.60
    -11.50 (-0.49%)
     
  • NIKKEI 225

    38,460.08
    +907.92 (+2.42%)
     
  • HANG SENG

    17,201.27
    +372.34 (+2.22%)
     
  • DAX

    18,221.79
    +84.14 (+0.46%)
     
  • CAC 40

    8,122.21
    +16.43 (+0.20%)
     

What You Must Know About Paternoster Resources plc’s (LON:PRS) Major Investors

In this article, I will take a quick look at Paternoster Resources plc’s (AIM:PRS) recent ownership structure – an unconventional investing subject, but an important one. A company’s ownership structure is often linked to its share performance in both the long- and short-term. Differences in ownership structure of companies can have a profound effect on how management’s incentives are aligned with shareholder returns, which is why we’ll take a moment to analyse PRS’s shareholder registry.

See our latest analysis for Paternoster Resources

AIM:PRS Ownership_summary Jun 12th 18
AIM:PRS Ownership_summary Jun 12th 18

Institutional Ownership

In PRS’s case, institutional ownership stands at 58.55%, significant enough to cause considerable price moves in the case of large institutional transactions, especially when there is a low level of public shares available on the market to trade. Although PRS has a high institutional ownership, such stock moves, in the short-term, are more commonly linked to a particular type of active institutional investors – hedge funds. For shareholders in PRS, sharp price movements may not be a major concern as active hedge funds hold a relatively small stake in the company. Although this doesn’t necessarily lead to high short-term volatility, we should dig deeper into PRS’s ownership structure to find how the remaining owner types can affect its investment profile.

Insider Ownership

Insiders form another group of important ownership types as they manage the company’s operations and decide the best use of capital. Insider ownership has been linked to better alignment between management and shareholders. PRS insiders hold a significant stake of 11.11% in the company. This level of insider ownership has been found to have a negative impact on companies with consistently low PE ratios (underperformers), while it has been positive in the case of high PE ratio firms (outperformers). It may be interesting to take a look at what company insiders have been doing with their holdings lately. While insider buying is possibly a sign of a positive outlook for the company, selling doesn’t necessarily indicate a negative outlook as they may be selling to meet personal financial needs.

AIM:PRS Insider_trading Jun 12th 18
AIM:PRS Insider_trading Jun 12th 18

General Public Ownership

A big stake of 14.48% in PRS is held by the general public. With this size of ownership, retail investors can collectively play a role in major company policies that affect shareholders returns, including executive remuneration and the appointment of directors. They can also exercise the power to decline an acquisition or merger that may not improve profitability.

Private Company Ownership

Another group of owners that a potential investor in PRS should consider are private companies, with a stake of 15.86%. While they invest more often due to strategic interests, an investment can also be driven by capital gains through share price appreciation. With this size of ownership in PRS, this ownership class can affect the company’s business strategy. As a result, potential investors should further explore the company’s business relations with these companies and find out if they can affect shareholder returns in the long-term.

Next Steps:

The company’s high institutional ownership makes margin of safety a very important consideration to existing investors since long bull and bear trends often emerge when these big-ticket investors see a change in long-term potential of the company. This is to avoid getting trapped in a sustained sell-off that is often observed in stocks with this level of institutional participation. However, ownership structure should not be the only determining factor when you’re building an investment thesis for PRS. Instead, you should be evaluating company-specific factors such as the intrinsic valuation, which is a key driver of Paternoster Resources’s share price. I urge you to complete your research by taking a look at the following:

ADVERTISEMENT
  1. Financial Health: Is PRS’s operations financially sustainable? Balance sheets can be hard to analyze, which is why we’ve done it for you. Check out our financial health checks here.

  2. Past Track Record: Has PRS been consistently performing well irrespective of the ups and downs in the market? Go into more detail in the past performance analysis and take a look at the free visual representations of PRS’s historicals for more clarity.

  3. Other High-Performing Stocks: Are there other stocks that provide better prospects with proven track records? Explore our free list of these great stocks here.

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.
To help readers see pass the short term volatility of the financial market, we aim to bring you a long-term focused research analysis purely driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis does not factor in the latest price sensitive company announcements.

The author is an independent contributor and at the time of publication had no position in the stocks mentioned.