Advertisement
UK markets close in 6 minutes
  • FTSE 100

    8,203.23
    +31.08 (+0.38%)
     
  • FTSE 250

    20,167.87
    +115.54 (+0.58%)
     
  • AIM

    771.39
    +3.28 (+0.43%)
     
  • GBP/EUR

    1.1648
    -0.0035 (-0.30%)
     
  • GBP/USD

    1.2551
    +0.0018 (+0.14%)
     
  • Bitcoin GBP

    48,999.24
    +1,755.52 (+3.72%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    1,328.29
    +51.31 (+4.02%)
     
  • S&P 500

    5,110.55
    +46.35 (+0.92%)
     
  • DOW

    38,590.91
    +365.25 (+0.96%)
     
  • CRUDE OIL

    78.53
    -0.42 (-0.53%)
     
  • GOLD FUTURES

    2,302.50
    -7.10 (-0.31%)
     
  • NIKKEI 225

    38,236.07
    -37.98 (-0.10%)
     
  • HANG SENG

    18,475.92
    +268.79 (+1.48%)
     
  • DAX

    17,972.96
    +76.46 (+0.43%)
     
  • CAC 40

    7,952.40
    +37.75 (+0.48%)
     

Oracle Corporation's (NYSE:ORCL) institutional investors lost 5.1% last week but have benefitted from longer-term gains

Key Insights

  • Significantly high institutional ownership implies Oracle's stock price is sensitive to their trading actions

  • A total of 3 investors have a majority stake in the company with 52% ownership

  • Insiders own 42% of Oracle

A look at the shareholders of Oracle Corporation (NYSE:ORCL) can tell us which group is most powerful. We can see that institutions own the lion's share in the company with 44% ownership. That is, the group stands to benefit the most if the stock rises (or lose the most if there is a downturn).

Institutional investors endured the highest losses after the company's market cap fell by US$17b last week. However, the 22% one-year returns may have helped alleviate their overall losses. We would assume however, that they would be on the lookout for weakness in the future.

ADVERTISEMENT

Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Oracle.

Check out our latest analysis for Oracle

ownership-breakdown
ownership-breakdown

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Oracle?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

We can see that Oracle does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Oracle's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

earnings-and-revenue-growth
earnings-and-revenue-growth

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Oracle. Our data suggests that Lawrence Ellison, who is also the company's Top Key Executive, holds the most number of shares at 42%. When an insider holds a sizeable amount of a company's stock, investors consider it as a positive sign because it suggests that insiders are willing to have their wealth tied up in the future of the company. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 5.4% and 4.5%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.

After doing some more digging, we found that the top 3 shareholders collectively control more than half of the company's shares, implying that they have considerable power to influence the company's decisions.

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There are plenty of analysts covering the stock, so it might be worth seeing what they are forecasting, too.

Insider Ownership Of Oracle

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

Our information suggests that insiders maintain a significant holding in Oracle Corporation. It has a market capitalization of just US$316b, and insiders have US$132b worth of shares in their own names. That's quite significant. Most would be pleased to see the board is investing alongside them. You may wish to access this free chart showing recent trading by insiders.

General Public Ownership

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 14% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

Next Steps:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Be aware that Oracle is showing 1 warning sign in our investment analysis , you should know about...

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.