Advertisement
UK markets close in 7 hours 15 minutes
  • FTSE 100

    8,416.39
    -29.41 (-0.35%)
     
  • FTSE 250

    20,810.97
    +35.34 (+0.17%)
     
  • AIM

    792.22
    +0.61 (+0.08%)
     
  • GBP/EUR

    1.1658
    +0.0009 (+0.08%)
     
  • GBP/USD

    1.2677
    -0.0007 (-0.05%)
     
  • Bitcoin GBP

    52,384.43
    +3,370.96 (+6.88%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    1,377.47
    -16.57 (-1.19%)
     
  • S&P 500

    5,308.15
    +61.47 (+1.17%)
     
  • DOW

    39,908.00
    +349.89 (+0.88%)
     
  • CRUDE OIL

    78.91
    +0.28 (+0.36%)
     
  • GOLD FUTURES

    2,395.00
    +0.10 (+0.00%)
     
  • NIKKEI 225

    38,920.26
    +534.53 (+1.39%)
     
  • HANG SENG

    19,359.36
    +285.65 (+1.50%)
     
  • DAX

    18,858.92
    -10.44 (-0.06%)
     
  • CAC 40

    8,211.28
    -28.71 (-0.35%)
     

Peel Hunt Limited's (LON:PEEL) largest shareholders are retail investors with 44% ownership, institutions own 21%

Key Insights

  • Significant control over Peel Hunt by retail investors implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions

  • A total of 13 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership

  • Insider ownership in Peel Hunt is 20%

Every investor in Peel Hunt Limited (LON:PEEL) should be aware of the most powerful shareholder groups. We can see that retail investors own the lion's share in the company with 44% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

And institutions on the other hand have a 21% ownership in the company. Large companies usually have institutions as shareholders, and we usually see insiders owning shares in smaller companies.

ADVERTISEMENT

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Peel Hunt, beginning with the chart below.

View our latest analysis for Peel Hunt

ownership-breakdown
ownership-breakdown

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Peel Hunt?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

We can see that Peel Hunt does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Peel Hunt's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

earnings-and-revenue-growth
earnings-and-revenue-growth

Hedge funds don't have many shares in Peel Hunt. Our data shows that Darren Carter is the largest shareholder with 8.3% of shares outstanding. For context, the second largest shareholder holds about 6.6% of the shares outstanding, followed by an ownership of 4.5% by the third-largest shareholder. Steven Fine, who is the third-largest shareholder, also happens to hold the title of Member of the Board of Directors.

A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 13 shareholders have a combined ownership of 51% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. While there is some analyst coverage, the company is probably not widely covered. So it could gain more attention, down the track.

Insider Ownership Of Peel Hunt

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of Peel Hunt Limited. Insiders have a UK£29m stake in this UK£147m business. This may suggest that the founders still own a lot of shares. You can click here to see if they have been buying or selling.

General Public Ownership

With a 44% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Peel Hunt. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

Private Equity Ownership

With a stake of 6.6%, private equity firms could influence the Peel Hunt board. Some investors might be encouraged by this, since private equity are sometimes able to encourage strategies that help the market see the value in the company. Alternatively, those holders might be exiting the investment after taking it public.

Private Company Ownership

It seems that Private Companies own 4.5%, of the Peel Hunt stock. It might be worth looking deeper into this. If related parties, such as insiders, have an interest in one of these private companies, that should be disclosed in the annual report. Private companies may also have a strategic interest in the company.

Next Steps:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important.

I like to dive deeper into how a company has performed in the past. You can access this interactive graph of past earnings, revenue and cash flow, for free.

If you would prefer discover what analysts are predicting in terms of future growth, do not miss this free report on analyst forecasts.

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.