Q1 2024 Lindblad Expeditions Holdings Inc Earnings Call

Participants

Craig Felenstein; Chief Financial Officer; Lindblad Expeditions Holdings Inc

Sven-Olof Lindblad; Chief Executive Officer, Founder, and Board Director; Lindblad Expeditions Holdings Inc

Steven Wieczynski; Analyst; Stifel, Nicolaus & Company, Incorporated

Eric Wold; Analyst; B. Riley Securities, Inc.

Chris Woronka; Analyst; Deutsche Bank Securities Inc.

Alex Fuhrman; Analyst; Craig-Hallum Capital Group LLC

Presentation

Operator

Good morning, everyone, and welcome to the Lindblad Expeditions 2024 first quarter financial results. My name is Angela, and I will be coordinating your call today. (Operator instructions)
I will now hand you over to your host, Craig Felenstein, Chief Financial Officer, to begin. Please go ahead.

Craig Felenstein

Thank you, operator.
Good morning, everyone, and thank you for joining us for Lindblad's 2024 first-quarter earnings call. With me on the call today is Sven Lindblad, Lindblad's Founder and Chief Executive Officer. Sven will begin with some opening comments and then I will follow with some details on our financial results, balance sheet, and current 2024 expectations before we open the call for Q&A. You can find our latest earnings release in the Investor Relations section of our website.
Before we get started, let me remind everyone that the company's comments today may include forward-looking statements. Those expectations are subject to risks and uncertainties that may cause actual results and performance to be materially different from these expectations, and the company cannot guarantee the accuracy of any forecast or estimates, and we undertake no obligation to update any such forward-looking statement. If you would like more information on the risks involved in forward-looking statements, please see the company's SEC filings.
In addition, our comments may reference non-GAAP financial measures. A reconciliation of the most directly comparable GAAP financial measures and other associated disclosures are contained in the company's earnings release.
And with that out of the way, let me turn the call over to Sven.

Sven-Olof Lindblad

Thank you, Craig, and good morning and thank you all for joining us today. If I sound a little odd periodically, I've been hit hard by Howard Hughes, so I might cough now and then I'm sure that's true for many of you with all of flowering trees around in any case, Lindblad first quarter results set the stage for another year of double-digit growth and record results in 2024. Craig will provide additional color on our performance this past quarter, but before he does, let me take a few minutes to discuss some of the drivers of the continued growth this year as well as some of the steps we are taking to sustain that momentum in the years ahead.
First and foremost, the booking strength we experienced throughout 2023 has continued into this year as more and more guests want to explore the remarkable destinations. We visit bold to connect authentically with nature and culture is continually growing. And there's no other company in this segment with our track record or with our commitment to providing authentic and immersive travel itineraries. Bookings this year to date for future travel were up 20% versus the same period in 2023. And we expanded our overall in-year bookings growth to 4% ahead of where we were at the same point in 2023.
Now it's worth reminding that 2023 benefited from significant carryover business from cancellations during COVID. Excluding these carryover bookings, the reservations for 24 travel would be well over 20% of that a year ago. These carryover bookings were also one of the primary reasons for occupancies below the first quarter a year ago. Excluding carryover bookings, the occupancy would have increased versus first quarter of 2023. The majority of the carryover bookings for 2023 were early in the year. So the impact of these guests on occupancy growth will diminish as the year progresses.
Lastly, it is important to remember, as I discussed last quarter, that a key contributor to current occupancy levels is a two-year loss of generating new guests during COVID, drying up the pipeline of the key past guest constituency. This effect is diminishing by the day and occupancies will move higher as the pipeline again refills.
At the same time, there are a couple of external headwinds that we continue to deal with the first geopolitical events across the globe reality is that we've always they've always played a role ebbing and flowing through the years, and we are currently dealing with two specific events that certainly depressed revenue and occupancy in the first quarter, Israeli how much more events in Ecuador in early January, both cause cancellations and short-term softening of future business. These kinds of events can also affect costs fuel for example, increased significantly, hopefully temporarily due to the instability in the Middle East. Periodic disruptions may have a distorting effect on quarters. But as we continue to scale our business they will have less and less impact on overall results.
The other headwind because of discounting taking place with our competition in the Expedition space as 2023 evolve the summer and fall, we start to see more and more dramatic price actions, sometimes even two for one offerings for prime seasons in places like Antarctica. Clearly, the relationship with inventory and demand is out of balance for some of our peers as well as some desperation coming out of COVID rather than joining the for a given the potential long-term ramifications to the value proposition we deliver. We have remained committed not to buy occupancy and maintain price integrity, which you can see with our net yield up slightly versus a year versus the first quarter a year ago, there is little to no benefit in adding occupancy of yield decreases proportionately.
So price integrity is key as a key long-term metric and essential to preserve even if occupancies move ahead a bit slower in the short term, given the opportunity in experiential travel, our thesis is that brand is now and will become even more important than ever that is why we are so excited about the recent extension and expansion of our brand partnership with National Geographic until 2040. With the power of both our brands now combined with the distribution clout of Disney, we believe we can leverage our collective strengths to really take advantage of the increased demand while distinguishing ourselves from competition.
We just came off a five day offside on one of our expedition ships with high level participation from all three entities. The purpose was to build understanding and to surface meaningful ideas that will propel us off into the future with a core theme being the power of three. This was just another step towards maximizing the opportunity ahead. Since the day, the new agreement was signed in November. Our team, along with their marketing and sales teams, have been deepened into strategy and tactical plans on a regular basis to energize collective goals and build specific initiatives to drive business collaboratively.
We have made significant progress, including a new brand strategy that incorporates a new co-branded logo with National Geographic, which we will begin rolling out later this year. The brand changes have settled, but more fully harness the National Geographic brand to capitalize and one of the world's largest social media followings and their extremely high awareness trust and credibility as we focus on maximizing the brand opportunity.
We are also updating our website on both National Geographic expeditions and expeditions.com domains to create a seamless unified booking experience last summer, we launched a completely redesigned online booking flow on the expeditions.com website and has since seen a near doubling of the percentage of our direct bookings made online we're now actively working on the development needed to enable all of those same digital features on the National Geographic expeditions website, and we'll launch those enhancements later in this year.
A key component of the new arrangement is the ability to leverage the powerful Disney sales network. Our teams are focused and energized on developing coordinated sales strategies, B2B marketing tactics and events and activating high potential new distribution channels. The expanded license agreement also gives us the ability to sell globally. Our consumer and trade sales efforts will launch the first launch in our first new market by the end of the summer and more will follow based on market opportunities. While we continue to lay these foundational blocks were already leveraging the power of Disney synergy machine fit to execute high visibility on brand activations today.
Over the course of the last few months, Disney has leaned on their marketing engine to place the co-branded some of their most valuable visible media assets, including the Wheel of Fortune, Good Morning America, Disney+, National Geographic, and even on the homepage of Disney.com to celebrate Earth Month.
Bookings in the year for travel in 2024 are up 35% versus 2023. And the Disney and National Geographic marketing efforts has contributed to that result. These are just a few highlights where we're working together to create both the top of funnel demand and lower funnel performance for years to come. We anticipate really benefiting from this new arrangement starting in 2025 as we reach more citizens explores than ever before by opening larger addressable markets through new worldwide audiences.
As we look to maximize the opportunity with National Geographic and business, we have become even more focused on itinerary development and innovating the ways we reimburse our guests and parts of the world. We have been building for years. We have made some major changes for this year and into the future, balancing our inventory to accommodate both past and new guests. Two of the most significant are focused on Iceland, which attracts a greater level of new guests and new itineraries.
And that dark to really provide flights either one way or both ways from South America to the continent, avoiding either one or both crossings of the Drake passage and allowing people with less available time to participate. These programs will know them from November 24 through February 25 sold out faster than anything we ever, ever offered. And for the '25, '26 season; we will add another ship the National Geographic Orion fully dedicated to this approach, allowing us to connect with more travelers who wouldn't have considered this type of an expedition before.
This also speaks to our ability to be nimble with regard to our product offerings as we focus on driving higher returns across the fleet. We also continue to broaden and deepen our land-based portfolio with this morning's announcement of our signing a deal to acquire by Wineland-Thompson Adventures, which includes respected Tanzania, Safari specialist Thompson Safari is with more than 40 years of experience in the country. Our portfolio also includes the historic award really gives farm large, an 80-acre Sanctuary.
That was my favorite lodge for those guys in East Africa. Tanzania is one of the finest places in Africa for wildlife viewing, including same national parks like the serine Getty and in Ghana, Ghana, creator and African suppliers have been have exploded in recent years as evidenced by Natural Habitats growth in the region. Similar to the acquisitions of Natural Habitat, DuVine Cycling off the beaten path, classic journeys Lindblad will leverage its experience and resources to further accelerate the growth of the Wineland-Thompson brands and capitalized on the growing demand for aseptic and immersive adventure travel. Insofar as we do need regulatory approval in Tanzania and expect the transaction to close early in the second half of 2024. Once it does Wineland-Thompson Adventures will create additional value for our guests and for our shareholders.
Before I finish up, I would be remiss not to mention this is Craig's last earnings call with us. He has been our valued CFO for 7.5 years and has been a true partner to me, the Board, and the entire organization. We will miss him a great deal and wish him well on his new non-competitive opportunity. We are working on the transition and expect to have news on this front before Craig leaves at the end of the month.
Many thanks for your time for the last time, Craig. And now I will turn the call back over to you.

Craig Felenstein

Thanks, Sven and thanks so much for those kind words.
Lindblad's first-quarter performance has the company well positioned to deliver another year of record financial results as it further ramps chip operations, but broader deployment of its expanded fleet and continued expansion of its diversified portfolio of land businesses. The year-on-year results are expected to ramp throughout the year as the company leverages the investments it has made in overall infrastructure and marketing and sales capabilities to capitalize on the strong demand for experiential travel.
Turning to the first quarter, total company revenue of $154 million increased $10 million or 7% versus the first quarter of 2023 as we continue to offer additional trips across both the Lindblad and land experience segment.
At the Lindblad segment, revenue of $118.3 million increased $2.8 million or 2% versus the first quarter a year ago, led by a 3% increase in available guest nights from broader utilization of the fleet and from 1% net yield growth to $1,219 per available guest nights, primarily due to higher pricing and increased other revenue, partially offset by a decrease in occupancy to 76% from 81% in the first quarter a year ago.
The first quarter did include the impact of softness in the Middle East due to recent worldwide events and also to the cancellation of two voyages in the Galapagos as we discussed last quarter. As occupancy ramps there will be significant operating leverage inherent in the marine platform as the company attracts more and more guests while maintaining strong pricing discipline across the expanded fleet.
At the land experiences segment, revenue of $35.3 million increased $7.4 million or 27% versus a year ago, led by additional guests and higher pricing across Natural Habitats trips to Africa and the Northern Lights, DuVine Cycling stores across Latin America and Portugal, classic journeys, walking tours in Cuba and Costa Rica and off the beaten path trips to US national parks. Total company revenue growth was more than offset by higher operating costs in the quarter with adjusted EBITDA of $21.6 million, down $5.6 million versus the same period a year ago.
Looking a little closer at the cost side of the business, operating expenses before depreciation and amortization, interest and taxes increased $15.8 million or 14% versus the first quarter of 2023, led by a $7.3 million or 10% increase in cost of tours versus a year ago. This was primarily related to operating additional ship and land-based itineraries.
The cost of tours increase also reflects expenses associated with the other revenue, the impact of foreign currency on operating expenses and higher fuel costs due to increased usage from operating additional trips and higher pricing versus a year ago.
Fuel costs were 6% of revenue in the first quarter of 2024, which was in line with the first quarter a year ago. Fuel prices have continued to rise and are anticipated to be a bit of a headwind for the remainder of the year. But overall, fuel remains a relatively small component of our operating costs.
Sales and marketing costs increased $2.1 million or 10% versus a year ago, primarily due to increased royalties associated with the expanded National Geographic agreement and additional marketing spending to drive future bookings.
G&A expense during the quarter increased $6.4 million or 27% versus a year ago, excluding stock-based compensation and onetime items, primarily due to higher personnel costs associated with the expanded operations as well as from increased credit card commissions related to final payments for upcoming itineraries and higher deposits on new reservations for future travel.
It's important to remember that the credit card commissions are paid upon cash receipt with the expense recognized today and the trip revenue not recognized until the guest travels with bookings up meaningfully in the first quarter versus the same period a year ago. The expense impact is significantly higher year on year with revenue growth to be delivered in the periods ahead.
The increased operating expenses resulted in total company net loss available to stockholders of $5.1 million or $0.10 per diluted share versus $0.4 million or $0.01 per diluted share reported in the first quarter a year ago. The current quarter also included additional interest expense of $1.1 million, net associated with higher rates and increased borrowings related to our debt refinancing in May 2023 as well as lower tax expense of $1.3 million and a $0.8 million decline in stock-based compensation.
Turning to the balance sheet, we ended the first quarter with $224 million in cash, an increase of $37 million versus the end of 2023. The growth was driven by free cash flow of $37 million with operating cash flow of $44 million, primarily due to increased cash received for future travel, partially offset by $6 million of CapEx, mostly due to maintenance CapEx and some additional spending on our digital initiatives.
Please note that after the quarter, the company did acquire an additional 10% of Natural Habitat and an additional 5% of DuVine Cycling for $16.7 million in aggregate and now owns 90% and 75% of these growing businesses, respectively.
Moving forward, the company anticipates using approximately $24 million in cash in the acquisition of Wineland-Thompson that was announced this morning with the transaction expected to close during the third quarter. The company will continue to explore additional growth opportunities in the years a year ahead, including further diversifying its product portfolio or opportunistically expanding its fleet to capitalize on the continued growth in demand for experiential travel.
Turning to the full year 2024, the company continues to anticipate significant growth, driven by higher guest counts and increased net yields across the fleet as well as additional travels across the growing land businesses. The Lindblad segment is in a strong booking position for the current year, having already booked over 94% of the Lindblad segment full year projected ticket revenues for 2024.
Given the strong booking trends, the company still expects total revenue in 2024 between $610 million and $630 million and adjusted EBITDA between $88 million and $98 million. Due to the uncertainty regarding the timing of closing the acquisition of Wineland-Thompson Adventures, there is minimal contributions included in our expectations for this year.
Please note that, as we mentioned last quarter, our second quarter results will be impacted slightly by two voyage cancellations on the explorer as we decided to transit around the Red Sea. Before I finish, I would like to take a quick moment to thank all the employees of Lindblad, including Sven and the leadership team in particular, as well as the Lindblad's Board for their support over these past 7.5 years. It has been an honor and a privilege to work for Lindblad Expeditions, and I know the company has a really bright future ahead as they take more and more guests to the remarkable destinations they have been visiting for decades.
And lastly, thank you to all of you and the investment community who have supported the company and I had the pleasure of interacting with in my time here. I have really enjoyed sharing our business with you. Thank you for your interest and now Sven and I would be happy to answer any questions you may have.

Question and Answer Session

Operator

(Operator instructions)
Steven Wieczynski, Stifel.

Steven Wieczynski

First of all, congrats, Craig on the on the new opportunity, you obviously will be invested at Lindblad for sure. So yes.
Okay. So but if we think about the rest, if we think about the rest of the year. It seems like the investment and the royalties that you guys are going to be paying out for this year for the revised Disney agreement might be a little bit more than we were expecting in terms of what we saw in the first quarter. So I'm just kind of wondering how we should think about costs associated with that investment for the next three quarters. And then on top of that is the right is the right thinking here that this year is all about the investment and in that new partnership. And then 2025 and beyond is really when you'll start to see the benefits from teaming up with Disney. And I think Stan mentioned that in his prepared remarks, but just want to make sure that that's the way we should think about the next call it, 12 to 24 months. Sure.

Craig Felenstein

So let me let me start with. Thanks, for your kind words, Steve, I appreciate it.
So let me start with the National Geographic year on year payments. So as you know, we are now with that agreement and pay a flat royalty fee throughout the course of the year a year ago. The payments to National Geographic obviously fluctuated depending on their individual performance because they're being paid a commission at the same time as well, the performance of the overall company.
So the impact in every given quarter is going to fluctuate and the impact in Q1, when you look at it year on year will be greater than it will be in some of the other quarters later in this year. So that's kind of how the year-on-year growth in the National Geographic payments will play out for the next nine months.
When you look at the positive impact that they're going to have incentive to have some additional color here given the booking window that we do have, which is about nine months still on average, you would anticipate the majority of the impact being in 2025 in earnest.
Now there has been, as I mentioned in this year, some one-offs that have been done to take advantage of the Disney distribution power and the National Geographic distribution power. And we do believe that's contributing to some of the strong booking growth that we're seeing today. But the real value and the real significant value will take place in 2025 and beyond.

Sven-Olof Lindblad

Yes, Steve, I could add a couple of things.
So if you think about that, we signed our agreement with National Geographic in November, right, last year and prior to that Disney was really not a factor in the equation. It was we had for since 2004, we had a relationship with National Geographic and whatever their machine was capable of providing and it was it was actually significant, but now for the P&L now since November, we're adding business to the equation and obviously their channels for distribution in particular and many of their ideas are incredible. I mean, this is the largest entertainment conglomerate in the world.
And so we believe that there is going to be significant value as a consequence but it is going to take a bit of time to ramp up because you know they don't they don't make decisions as it relates to something next month for a few weeks from now and implement them that way. It's much more of a long-term play. And we will start seeing we already have started seeing some results, but we will see I think significantly greater results starting in 2025.

Steven Wieczynski

Thanks for that, guys.
And then second question, want to ask about the acquisition there was announced this morning and I guess my question really isn't about the acquisition, but around the use of capital for that acquisition. And I guess what I'm getting at is yes. Look, I don't think we can ignore where that where the share price is today and in our opinion, to us the underappreciated long-term opportunity here with Disney and National Geographic. So to us, the share price does seem undervalued here. So I guess the question is how do you balance doing acquisitions like this versus taking that $30 million maybe not all that $30 million in terms of what you spent on the acquisition and essentially looking at buying back shares at these at these levels hopefully makes sense.

Craig Felenstein

Yeah, sure. And thanks, Steve, for the question.
We always have a balanced, what I would say is long-term growth and long-term capital deployment. When we look at the opportunities in front of us for an asset, an acquisition like one that and not get too specific in what opportunity is moving forward. But when you can buy it at a multiple that we acquire that asset at, which is significantly below where the multiple of our existing company is trading at, as you see some significant growth in that asset moving forward, especially when you layer in some of the expertise that we have at the Lindblad and Natural Habitat companies as well as some of the resources we have to continue to invest in those assets.
You weigh the opportunity versus the opportunity that you see investing in your own shares. And as you know, you can always help us identify when these assets become available, they become available when they become available. So we are continuously weighing the future growth opportunity with an asset like this versus what we believe is obviously significant upside in our existing shares. And as we move forward and we look to allocate capital moving forward, we will balance those things still between investing in our existing business, investing in M&A or returning capital to shareholders, either through buying back stock or through reducing our debt load and some capacity.

Steven Wieczynski

Okay, great. Thanks, guys. Appreciate it.

Operator

Eric Wold, B. Riley Securities.

Eric Wold

Thank you. Good morning.
Two questions for me. I guess I guess the first one, we I know that you reaffirmed the prior guidance ranges and it's only been a couple of months since the Q4 call when you first gave that. But was there anything with the costs you saw in Q1 and maybe so far in April, Q2 that were not fully anticipated when you gave that guidance that would kind of need to see some relief to maybe give you more comfort in the higher end of that range than the lower end.

Craig Felenstein

Nothing significant. I mean, the biggest one is obviously fuel prices have continued to rise, and that has created a bit of a headwind for us. And that will continue to be the case. And certainly when we look at some of the voyage cancellations that we've had, the impact of not only those voyage cancellations and also some of what I would say is residual softness related to some of the instability around the world would have us as a bit of a headwind on some of our guidance here, but we gave a range when we gave the range back in the first or end of the fourth quarter.
And we still feel comfortable that we'll be within that range here moving forward. And the biggest variables will certainly be the continued revenue generation, as I said on my remarks, with 94% of the way sold out with regards to our revenue expectations for the year at the Lindblad segment. But that last 6% does come at a very high margin, right? So it's imperative on us to fill the rest of the 6%. And if we do that, we should be able to get where we want to be from a full year perspective.

Eric Wold

Got it. And then second question again, you understand the decision to add a highly variable cost land-based business, it's different than from the decision to add a new ship to the fleet But you maybe update us on kind of where you are on the decision curve to add to the fleet and kind of and what you really need to see to make that commitment, whether it's a new ship available out there with some of your competitors that may be struggling or committing to a kind of a multiyear build process?

Sven-Olof Lindblad

Yeah. First about the land company. So just one of the things that was particularly attractive about this most recent acquisition was that this is a company that's been in existence for 40 years and in a country, which is probably the wealthiest country from the perspective of why I live in all of Africa and to get a footing in a country like Tanzania with somebody that has had that wealth of experience, it is really, really a meaningful opportunity and has tremendous opportunity to be developed further.
So for us, so far, the whole concept of land businesses has been a sort of a counter balance, if you will, you know, shifts here, and that's it here. It's largely fixed costs. If certain things happen like COVID and the dynamics of that are different or the effect of that is different on ships on land company, but we are absolutely keen on growing our maritime business, though, there are a couple of triggers that we need to that. There are a couple of things that we did see before we trigger new opportunities.
And one of them, by the way is there's an interesting question about building ships or acquiring ships bookmark. The business was largely built on acquiring ships. And then in recent years on building ships of our thesis is that there probably will be ship available in the future that were built and perhaps don't have a phone that weren't as successful as the people who build some hope they'd be maybe a polite way of putting it.
And so we're really, really keeping our eyes out on companies that have ships that may become, though that's somewhat at what we wanted to make sure of is that we are doing as good a job as we did prior to the pandemic and filling the ships that we have because the value of that is off the charts by comparison to any other form of investment.
So making up to 10% differential let's say, food where we are now and where we would like to be 10%, 12% is just massively valuable and you don't want to add inventory and spread out your reach because you're adding your costs and you're just spreading out your reset. That really isn't a smart thing to do. So we have to feel that we're at the stage where I mean, my goal always is to have a feel that you can get 125% of the occupancy that you have and the minute you envision, you're headed in that direction, you can begin to trigger a new acquisition.

Eric Wold

Got it. Thank you, both.

Operator

Chris Woronka, DB.

Chris Woronka

Yes, good morning, guys. And Craig, congrats on the new opportunity, all the best at the place and what we'll miss you.
Can we maybe talk a little bit about the comments you made earlier about the competitive environment. And I guess the question would be, is the level surprise greater on kind of the level of competition that's out there and the some of the new entrants are more about how they're handling their pricing. Thanks.

Sven-Olof Lindblad

Yeah. Sven, here, I think it's a combination of both. I mean, somebody obviously got a hold of a spreadsheet at a certain point and said, wow, this business looks like it has a tremendous potential. And because when you think about it, the explosion of entries in the last five years is just unprecedented. So many more ships that were ever imagined in this segment. So it's unprecedented.
So I think to be totally honest, I think what people have probably done is underestimated the complexity of expedition travel. If you're going to remote areas, you have to understand geography of the right teams or else you're going to get into trouble. You have to you have to have good deep relationships with the people in the institutions in those countries, et cetera, et cetera, et cetera.
So it's actually quite complicated. The other thing is, as I think people maybe have underrated the intelligence of the audience in different instances because the audience is very sophisticated that does this kind of thing and they care deeply about quality. What is the quality of the staff? What is the quality of the experience, how well thought out of the itineraries, et cetera, et cetera, et cetera.
So and then and then brand, of course, as I mentioned earlier, is, I think, an important thing. I mean, obviously, our brand is very, very well known to a very, very small number of people. I mean because when we started this business, expedition travel was not it was not a big, big category of our, but for people that are that have any interest in that category.
And that includes the trade are we are very well known in that regard. But obviously National Geographic is a brand that everybody on the planet knows. And so the combination of the two to create something I think quite meaningful are very, very meaningful. That then helps those interested in expedition travel sort of migrate nonfiction.

Chris Woronka

Okay (multiple speakers) -- yeah, thanks, Sven.
And I mean just to follow up on the cost side, and I totally understand and heard what you mentioned about the National Geographic fees and the changes there. But on the other things and maybe even look at it ex fuel, is there anything it just suggests that you see moderation on the pressure coming in the second half? I know some of the costs can be kind of lumpy insurance, things like that. I mean, is there any visibility into lower increases moving forward?

Craig Felenstein

Sure. And thanks for the kind words earlier, Chris. So there's a couple of things on the cost that will, I would say, mitigate a bit. One is as you can imagine, the first quarter of the year is a big quarter from us from a cash receipt perspective, both from a deposits on future travel as well as down payments for new reservations. The credit card fees are definitely higher in Q1. So the growth in Q1 there would be higher than it would be later in the year.
Second thing is there are some timing issues associated with some of the land company costs that come in the first quarter. You could see that flow through from a land company profitability perspective, in the first quarter is not what it is later in the year. So you should see a what I would say, better margins, I would say on the land business, certainly in the rest of the year. So those are the big ones, and there's a little bit of currency hit in the first quarter are related to some of the currency movements and some of the operations that are buying companies as well. So that should abate itself as well. So those are some somewhat what I would say is one-offs that you'll see a nice flow through the rest of the year.

Sven-Olof Lindblad

Can I add something?

Chris Woronka

Okay. Very good. Thanks, guys.

Sven-Olof Lindblad

So I think if I could just add one thing to spend here is because Craig and I talk about this talk about this a lot. Obviously, obviously, there is an expectation on the part of a lot of people for the occupancies to go up rightly so and they will go up by the way, but more important than occupancy in the short term is price integrity in the long term? Because what's what are the say did you really sort of analyze a business like this, let's say you all you can get to we could get to 100% occupancy tomorrow if we took on some really bad habits that would have a very negative effect on the business long term. So ship small, small ships, expedition ships cannot function that revenues there are 50%. It's not positive. It's not sustainable. And so we our emphasis is let's do that. Let's drive up occupancy, but at the same time, let's make sure we do not violate price integrity because once you do too much of that is hard to come back, right. So I just wanted to clarify that point.

Chris Woronka

Makes sense. Thanks, guys.

Craig Felenstein

Thanks, Chris.

Operator

(Operator instructions)
Alex Fuhrman, Craig-Hallum Capital Group LLC.

Alex Fuhrman

Hey, guys. Thanks for taking my question. And Craig, sorry to hear that you're going to be leaving the company.
Sven, you mentioned that some of your geographies, I think Antarctica in particular on you're seeing a lot more competitive pricing from some of your competitors with the two for one deal. Curious do you think a lot of this is ultimately short term in nature? Or do you think given the nature of your small shifts and how nimble you can be or there may be opportunities to reposition some of your ships for part of the season to even more remote and less visited destinations where are you pricing power over time?

Sven-Olof Lindblad

Well, we had talked about as remote as you're going to get to a point where there is there is competitive price pressure, but we're doing very well in that truck. So not a lot despite the fact that there's an overwhelming number of shifts down that. We're doing well. And one of the one of the one of the reasons why is because we really like what we did with our flying program for one of our ships. So we had the dilemma where we had Asia.
There was an older ship very nicely, by the way national geographic reach for next to our two new ships, the National Geographic Endeavour and the National Geographic Resolution. And you know, there's a natural inclination on the part of people who want to buy something that's moved. So that shifts were doing well and the Explorer was lagging a little bit behind just because again choose older and not the new thing. So what we did is we created a whole different program incorporating the flying into Antarctica, allowing people with less time to go there.
And that was the perfect counterpoint to the dilemma. We didn't like discounted. We just change the idea and people just bought it and it filled up instantly essentially instantly. And so there are lots of levers you can deploy in order to change your destiny and it isn't just -- obviously isn't just price geography is absolutely key or how you operate in a particular geography. So there are a variety of ways you can kind of get the job done in this case, it was by creating a totally new idea. So the Explore and the new ships were, in fact, not in competition anymore.

Alex Fuhrman

Okay, great. That's really helpful. Thank you.

Sven-Olof Lindblad

Thank you, Alex.

Operator

Thank you. We have no further questions. I'll hand back to the management team to conclude.

Craig Felenstein

Thank you, operator, and thank you, everybody again for joining us today, and thank you for your years, and I look forward to finishing up the next month. And if you have any questions, please let me know as much as possible and we're happy to answer them today or in the future. Thank you.

Sven-Olof Lindblad

Many thanks, guys.

Operator

Thank you very much. This concludes today's call and thank you for joining. You may now disconnect your lines.