Advertisement
UK markets closed
  • FTSE 100

    8,139.83
    +60.97 (+0.75%)
     
  • FTSE 250

    19,824.16
    +222.18 (+1.13%)
     
  • AIM

    755.28
    +2.16 (+0.29%)
     
  • GBP/EUR

    1.1679
    +0.0022 (+0.19%)
     
  • GBP/USD

    1.2494
    -0.0017 (-0.13%)
     
  • Bitcoin GBP

    50,854.26
    -686.78 (-1.33%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    1,330.09
    -66.45 (-4.76%)
     
  • S&P 500

    5,099.96
    +51.54 (+1.02%)
     
  • DOW

    38,239.66
    +153.86 (+0.40%)
     
  • CRUDE OIL

    83.66
    +0.09 (+0.11%)
     
  • GOLD FUTURES

    2,349.60
    +7.10 (+0.30%)
     
  • NIKKEI 225

    37,934.76
    +306.28 (+0.81%)
     
  • HANG SENG

    17,651.15
    +366.61 (+2.12%)
     
  • DAX

    18,161.01
    +243.73 (+1.36%)
     
  • CAC 40

    8,088.24
    +71.59 (+0.89%)
     

What TikTok must overcome to show us it can be trusted

TikTok
TikTok

Shou Zi Chew, the Singaporean CEO of TikTok will be attending the US Congress today to answer questions and presumably defend his Chinese-owned app's independence and right to survive. It will be a daunting task: TikTok is at the centre of a geopolitical battle, regarded as a growing danger to national security by intelligence agencies and policymakers across the Western world.  Yet, politicians themselves seem to love it. The Business and Energy Secretary Grant Shapps posts videos direct from the National Grid Control Centre; Jeremy Corbyn uploads his Commons speeches and Luke Evans, Conservative MP for Bosworth, has taken his 41,000 followers on a guided tour of Downing Street.

These politicians know that TikTok gets their message out to a wide audience – the app has more than 1 billion users worldwide, hooked on seemingly innocuous bite-sized videos of anything from celebrities and dance routines to animals and cooking. Yet, as the company itself acknowledged this week in a statement, “with such scale comes significant responsibility” – and questions are being raised as to whether TikTok, which is owned by the Chinese company ByteDance, is fulfilling that. And if not, whether its future is at stake.

In the USA, Shou Zi Chew will be trying to stop the app might be banned over concerns about sensitive information getting into the hands of the Chinese government. The White House told federal agencies on Monday that they had to delete TikTok from government devices and a White House committee voted to advance legislation that would allow President Biden to ban it from all devices nationwide. The head of the FBI, Christopher Wray, says it “screams” of security concerns. Over here, Parliament has closed its TikTok account, although Michelle Donelan, the minister for Science, Innovation and Technology, has said she would not back a ban.

ADVERTISEMENT

The stakes could not be higher for TikTok – and it has been quick to be seen to be taking action over concerns about personal information getting into the wrong hands. This week, it announced Project Clover, a security regime costing €1.2 billion (£1 billion) a year that will ensure the data of UK and other European customers is held on servers in Ireland and Norway, with any data transfers being monitored by an independent European cybersecurity firm. TikTok said it wants to “build trust by ensuring the safety, privacy and security of our community and their data is critical”.

“If they don’t do the right things this could be existential for them,” says Jamie MacEwan, senior media analyst at Enders Analysis. “TikTok is a service you can ban without too much disruption in the real economy. It’s not like banning WhatsApp or an app with a lot of functionality. In the US, the biggest misgivings [over banning TikTok] are seen as losing the young vote and freedom of speech.”

He notes that while TikTok was successful in facing down a previous attempt to close it down led by Donald Trump, its current crisis “feels a bit more bi-partisan in the US” and is far more serious.

There is a battle for supremacy in artificial intelligence going on between America and China and TikTok is embroiled in that. “We are a private company that is bending over backwards to try and separate ourselves from the broader and serious and genuinely right concerns that Western countries have around China,” says one TikTok source. “You can’t make up trust in an instant, some of this we just have to earn over time.”

Despite these concerns, it is still the fastest-growing social media network in the UK.

Its turnover in the UK and Europe grew by 477 per cent in 2021 to $990million, thanks to monetisation tools that connected advertisers to a rising European user base of 150 million people. The UK operation, once run from a communal workspace, has expanded to around 2,000 people. So where does it need to take action and will it survive?

Spying and data

“The Chinese are not remotely interested in a teenager posting a video of themselves dancing on TikTok, but they are interested if the user’s parent is a government official because any information you can garner is a means to target individuals,” says Peter Warren, chairman of the Cyber Security Research Institute.

The app has been unable to shake off suspicion that it must comply with the 2017 Chinese National Intelligence Law, which dictates that “any organisation or citizen shall support, assist and cooperate with the state intelligence work in accordance with the law”. This means that “if TikTok is required by the Chinese government to turn over data, it will turn it over,” claims Warren.

TikTok argues that this never happens and that, despite having a Chinese parent, it is a global company with most of its ownership in the hands of US venture capital firms, such as General Atlantic and Sequoia Capital.

“What TikTok has to do is prove once and for all that it can stand on its own two feet and that is difficult because it is owned by ByteDance, which is headquartered in Beijing,” says MacEwan. “We know managers from Beijing fly back and forth and meet with TikTok managers because TikTok is ByteDance’s global business and ByteDance wants to be a global tech giant.”

Yet other social networks have been demonised before. YouTube was once a home for terrorist videos. Instagram was linked to teenage suicides. TikTok, which plans an IPO (Initial Public Offering), is the first outsider to challenge Silicon Valley’s hegemony in social media.

Cybersecurity expert Claire Trachet applauds TikTok’s use of a bug bounty programme for “ethical hackers” to search the app for security weaknesses. “No illegitimate data extraction has been found to date,” she points out. But as the Chinese technology giant Huawei found when it was excluded from the UK’s 5G infrastructure, perception and trust are essential in matters of national security.

Disinformation

Ofcom reported last year that TikTok was the UK’s fastest-growing source for news. But the news that users find there may be unreliable.

A study by NewsGuard, which rates the credibility of news websites, found that new TikTok users would receive false information about the war in Ukraine within 40 minutes of joining the app. In regions where TikTok is heavily used for news, such as south-east Asia, the platform is fertile ground for Beijing’s propaganda and Kremlin war narratives.

The app provoked disgust when ghoulish “TikTok sleuths” descended on St Michael’s on Wyre to post theories on the disappearance of Nicola Bulley. Lancashire Police publicly accused “TikTokers” of circulating “false information, accusations and rumours”. Millions of people saw these videos – but TikTok and Ofcom have made moves to moderate them.

Traditional news outlets are trying to combat this, through their own, more reliable TikTok videos. 81 per cent of traditional UK news publishers were using the app. “Despite concerns about data security they are there, because they recognise the risk of not being there in terms of combatting disinformation … and also of losing future audiences,” says the Reuters Institute’s Nic Newman.

Influence on children

Attitudes to TikTok vary across generations. That divide is embodied in school “TikTok protests” that have seen pupils across the country taking on head teachers by filming their mass objections to rules on uniforms and toilet access. The Department for Education declared itself  “concerned” as protests were staged across the country. Scores of students have been suspended. TikTok’s industry-leading filming tools are also coming under fire for their impact on young behaviour: its new “Bold Glamour” filter is so effective in improving facial appearances that beauty influencers complain it risks destroying a user’s confidence in how they look in real life. Despite China’s appetite for facial recognition technology, TikTok says it does not collect biometric data.

In its efforts to appear more responsible, Tik Tok has introduced a 60-minute daily time limit to safeguard young users (although it can be bypassed if you enter a password).

MacEwan is unconvinced that TikTok can change its colours. “I think they have been found wanting,” he says of TikTok’s data security reforms and its attempts to demonstrate its independence. “Byte Dance bankrolls them and ByteDance managers still oversee TikTok teams. There is a fight to prove they can be properly independent in the way they run their business and protect their users.”