Advertisement
UK markets close in 8 hours 22 minutes
  • FTSE 100

    8,023.87
    0.00 (0.00%)
     
  • FTSE 250

    19,599.39
    0.00 (0.00%)
     
  • AIM

    749.18
    0.00 (0.00%)
     
  • GBP/EUR

    1.1590
    +0.0001 (+0.01%)
     
  • GBP/USD

    1.2337
    -0.0013 (-0.10%)
     
  • Bitcoin GBP

    53,827.28
    -0.78 (-0.00%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    1,401.43
    -13.33 (-0.94%)
     
  • S&P 500

    5,010.60
    +43.37 (+0.87%)
     
  • DOW

    38,239.98
    +253.58 (+0.67%)
     
  • CRUDE OIL

    83.02
    +0.17 (+0.21%)
     
  • GOLD FUTURES

    2,316.50
    -29.90 (-1.27%)
     
  • NIKKEI 225

    37,552.16
    +113.55 (+0.30%)
     
  • HANG SENG

    16,793.14
    +281.45 (+1.70%)
     
  • DAX

    17,860.80
    +123.44 (+0.70%)
     
  • CAC 40

    8,040.36
    +17.95 (+0.22%)
     

RBS, S&P sued by European investors for $250 mln crisis losses

SYDNEY, Dec 5 (Reuters) - Royal Bank of Scotland (LSE: RBS.L - news) and rating agency Standard & Poor's have been sued by a group of European institutional investors for damages of up to $250 million suffered on complex financial products in the lead up to the global financial crisis.

The claim is the first group action of its kind to be launched in Europe against an investment bank and rating agency for their conducts prior to the crisis, litigation funder Bentham IMF Ltd said in a statement on Thursday.

The group of 16 European institutional investors filed the claim in Amsterdam on Wednesday for damages of up to $250 million suffered on investments in CPDOs - or constant proportion debt obligations - that were rated AAA by S&P.

The case also follows the landmark judgement issued by Australia's Federal Court in November 2012, which found S&P had deceived 12 local government councils that bought the CPDOs.

ADVERTISEMENT

"Many of the facts, legal arguments and evidence successfully established in the Australian claim will be deployed in the Dutch action," Bentham IMF (Frankfurt: MXG1.F - news) said.

The Australian judgement said a reasonably competent ratings agency could not have rated the CPDOs at issue AAA, and that the rating was misleading, deceptive and a negligent misrepresentation to investors.

"Following the Australian Federal Court proceedings we have a comprehensive dossier of information and evidence that we believe is compelling to put before the Dutch judiciary," said Gidget Brugman, the lawyer who is handing the case in the Netherlands.