Advertisement
UK markets closed
  • FTSE 100

    8,433.76
    +52.41 (+0.63%)
     
  • FTSE 250

    20,645.38
    +114.08 (+0.56%)
     
  • AIM

    789.87
    +6.17 (+0.79%)
     
  • GBP/EUR

    1.1622
    +0.0011 (+0.09%)
     
  • GBP/USD

    1.2525
    +0.0001 (+0.01%)
     
  • Bitcoin GBP

    48,614.13
    -1,599.42 (-3.19%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    1,259.02
    -98.99 (-7.29%)
     
  • S&P 500

    5,222.68
    +8.60 (+0.16%)
     
  • DOW

    39,512.84
    +125.08 (+0.32%)
     
  • CRUDE OIL

    78.20
    -1.06 (-1.34%)
     
  • GOLD FUTURES

    2,366.90
    +26.60 (+1.14%)
     
  • NIKKEI 225

    38,229.11
    +155.13 (+0.41%)
     
  • HANG SENG

    18,963.68
    +425.87 (+2.30%)
     
  • DAX

    18,772.85
    +86.25 (+0.46%)
     
  • CAC 40

    8,219.14
    +31.49 (+0.38%)
     

REUTERS SUMMIT-Pratt sees knowing 'root cause' of F-35 engine issue by end Sept.

(For other news from the Reuters Aerospace and Defense Summit, click on http://www.reuters.com/summit/Aero14)

By Andrea Shalal

WASHINGTON, Sept 9 (Reuters) - United Technologies Corp's Pratt & Whitney unit said the "root cause" of the June 23 engine failure on a Lockheed Martin Corp F-35 fighter jet should be clear by the end of September, which would pave the way for over $1 billion in contracts for another 84 engines.

Engine maker Pratt & Whitney said it has delivered six of its F135 engines to the U.S. government since Aug. 29, when it resumed deliveries that had been halted after the June incident which grounded the F-35 fleet for weeks and prevented its international debut.

ADVERTISEMENT

Bennett Croswell, president of Pratt & Whitney Military Engines, said he still hoped to keep the government's flight test plan on track through a series of measures aimed at addressing the issue and lifting restrictions on test aircraft.

"I believe that through the combination of things we will keep the flight test program on track," Croswell told the Reuters Aerospace and Defense Summit.

In June, an Air Force F-35A training jet caught fire after its Pratt engine broke apart and ripped a fuel line as the jet prepared to take off from Eglin Air Force Base in Florida. U.S. officials blame the incident on excessive rubbing of part of the engine's fan section against an adjacent seal.

The incident has raised fresh concerns about the $400 billion F-35 Joint Strike Fighter program, the Pentagon's largest-ever arms program, which is about 70 percent over initial cost estimates and years behind schedule.

U.S. officials say the program is back on track after earlier problems, although Air Force Lieutenant General Chris Bogdan last week said the engine issue had put the development program about 30 to 45 days behind schedule.

Croswell said Pratt was taking the issue very seriously and expected it to be resolved "in relatively short order." He also noted that such problems were meant to be found during the design and development phase of any new program.

The F-35 program has completed about 60 percent of its developmental flight testing, and the F135 engine has logged about 26,000 ground test hours, 8,000 flight test hours and 19,500 overall flight hours to date. Fighter engines are considered mature after more than 200,000 hours, he said.

The fix should be moderate in cost, Croswell said.

"It should not be a very expensive solution," he said, noting that retrofits would be possible without an expensive tear-apart of the F-35's powerful engine.

Croswell said Pratt had essentially wrapped up negotiations with the Pentagon on the 84 engines in the seventh and eighth low rate production contracts, but Bogdan wanted a clearer understanding of the root cause of the incident before signing off on an agreement valued at over $1 billion.

The Pentagon is negotiating a separate contract with Lockheed for an eighth batch of jets.

Croswell confirmed that Pratt would pay to fix the current issue and said the company had also agreed to share in the cost of future problems, but details were still being finalized.

"We have agreed in principle to provide a warranty to the U.S. government for future LRIP contracts. We have not yet finalized a warranty agreement, but P&W would likely pay a percentage of the total cost of certain performance specification shortfalls," spokesman Matthew Bates said.

Croswell said the engine failure came about eight hours after an unusual maneuver involving a roll, yaw and heavy gravity loads during sharp turns. "This is a manuever that the engine should be able to withstand," he said.

Croswell said Pratt had already completed a baseline test of the current engine at its West Palm Beach, Florida facility, and had begun testing possible fixes. He said the company was investigating whether the density of the polyimide, a rubbery material made by Dupont, had played a role.

The part that broke apart ties the fan blades together. It is made by Cobham Plc (Other OTC: CBHMF - news) , Croswell said.

Follow Reuters Summits on Twitter @Reuters_Summits

(For more summit stories, see ) (Additional reporting by Lewis Krauskopf; Editing by Leslie Adler)