Advertisement
UK markets closed
  • NIKKEI 225

    38,460.08
    +907.92 (+2.42%)
     
  • HANG SENG

    17,201.27
    +372.34 (+2.21%)
     
  • CRUDE OIL

    82.95
    -0.41 (-0.49%)
     
  • GOLD FUTURES

    2,336.60
    -5.50 (-0.23%)
     
  • DOW

    38,359.74
    -143.95 (-0.37%)
     
  • Bitcoin GBP

    52,057.53
    -1,585.23 (-2.96%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    1,395.70
    -28.40 (-1.99%)
     
  • NASDAQ Composite

    15,657.38
    -39.26 (-0.25%)
     
  • UK FTSE All Share

    4,374.06
    -4.69 (-0.11%)
     

Steven Berkoff, Hamlet and that death threat

<span>Photograph: Graham Morris/Getty Images</span>
Photograph: Graham Morris/Getty Images

Your article (The rudest things they ever said about the Guardian, 11 May) refers to Steven Berkoff’s face-to-face threat to kill me. The incident was prompted by my Guardian review of Berkoff’s 1979 Hamlet performance, which I described as “fatally miscast”.

The article says Berkoff’s threat – which I saw as mild-mannered though slightly spooky – was “reportedly considered so serious that police protection was felt necessary”. That is untrue. This much did happen: I was interviewed by a detective from Holborn police station, and the Daily Express’s gossip column wrote a sensational story with Berkoff’s Hamlet poised with a dagger. But that was as far as it all went. I never feared for my life or a lesser attack. I admired, and still admire, Berkoff as an actor and director, and his anger subsided after some time. He apologised, and I did to him. Recollecting the incident now with amusement, I feel I was hot-headed in my use of the word “fatally”. It does not belong in the world of theatre criticism.
Nicholas de Jongh
London

Have an opinion on anything you’ve read in the Guardian today? Please email us your letter and it will be considered for publication.