Advertisement
UK markets close in 1 hour 51 minutes
  • FTSE 100

    8,050.14
    +9.76 (+0.12%)
     
  • FTSE 250

    19,605.43
    -113.94 (-0.58%)
     
  • AIM

    753.44
    -1.25 (-0.17%)
     
  • GBP/EUR

    1.1661
    +0.0016 (+0.14%)
     
  • GBP/USD

    1.2466
    +0.0004 (+0.03%)
     
  • Bitcoin GBP

    50,672.20
    -2,387.20 (-4.50%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    1,342.26
    -40.31 (-2.92%)
     
  • S&P 500

    4,998.89
    -72.74 (-1.43%)
     
  • DOW

    37,913.75
    -547.17 (-1.42%)
     
  • CRUDE OIL

    82.91
    +0.10 (+0.12%)
     
  • GOLD FUTURES

    2,327.50
    -10.90 (-0.47%)
     
  • NIKKEI 225

    37,628.48
    -831.60 (-2.16%)
     
  • HANG SENG

    17,284.54
    +83.27 (+0.48%)
     
  • DAX

    17,864.00
    -224.70 (-1.24%)
     
  • CAC 40

    7,971.09
    -120.77 (-1.49%)
     

New trial after jury met in room with Confederate symbols

NASHVILLE, Tenn. (AP) — A Tennessee appeals court has granted a new trial for a Black man who was convicted of aggravated assault by an all-white jury that deliberated in a room containing Confederate symbols.

The Tennessee Court of Criminal Appeals ruled Friday that Tim Gilbert deserves a new trial on charges stemming from a December 2018 altercation, The Tennessean reported.

Gilbert was sentenced to six years in prison after his conviction on charges of aggravated assault, reckless endangerment, unlawful possession of a weapon by a convicted felon and resisting arrest.

His attorney appealed, arguing that Gilbert's right to a fair trial was violated because the jury deliberated in a room adorned with an antique Confederate flag and a portrait of Confederate President Jefferson Davis.

ADVERTISEMENT

Video: Virginia removes Robert E. Lee statue from capital

The appeal court’s ruling came after a circuit court judge denied Gilbert’s motion for a new trial.

The appeals court ruling said that allowing the jury to decide whether Gilbert was innocent or guilty in a room at the Giles County Courthouse maintained by the United Daughters of the Confederacy “exposed the jury to extraneous prejudicial information and violated his constitutional rights to a fair trial conducted by an impartial jury.”

The trial court also made a mistake by allowing a challenged witness statement, an error that “cannot be classified as harmless,” the appeals court said.