UK markets closed
  • FTSE 100

    7,466.07
    -88.24 (-1.17%)
     
  • FTSE 250

    21,643.30
    -211.27 (-0.97%)
     
  • AIM

    1,082.51
    -4.13 (-0.38%)
     
  • GBP/EUR

    1.2014
    +0.0012 (+0.10%)
     
  • GBP/USD

    1.3401
    +0.0019 (+0.14%)
     
  • BTC-GBP

    28,413.72
    +727.26 (+2.63%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    863.83
    +21.37 (+2.54%)
     
  • S&P 500

    4,431.85
    +105.34 (+2.43%)
     
  • DOW

    34,725.47
    +564.69 (+1.65%)
     
  • CRUDE OIL

    87.29
    +0.68 (+0.79%)
     
  • GOLD FUTURES

    1,792.30
    -2.70 (-0.15%)
     
  • NIKKEI 225

    26,717.34
    +547.04 (+2.09%)
     
  • HANG SENG

    23,550.08
    -256.92 (-1.08%)
     
  • DAX

    15,318.95
    -205.32 (-1.32%)
     
  • CAC 40

    6,965.88
    -57.92 (-0.82%)
     

U.S. judge dismisses claims that LinkedIn overcharged advertisers

·2-min read
FILE PHOTO: The logo for LinkedIn Corporation, a social networking networking website for people in professional occupations, is shown in Mountain View

By Jonathan Stempel

(Reuters) - A U.S. judge dismissed a lawsuit accusing Microsoft Corp's LinkedIn of inflating the number of people who watched video ads so the networking platform could overcharge hundreds of thousands of advertisers.

In a decision on Monday, U.S. Magistrate Judge Susan van Keulen said that while some LinkedIn statements may have been misleading, the plaintiffs failed to show their legal remedies were inadequate before suing under two California laws that offered only equitable relief such as restitution.

The San Jose, California-based judge also said LinkedIn had no implied duty to provide "accurate ad metrics," citing its disclaimer that it was not responsible for click fraud or illicit third-party activity that could affect ad costs.

Advertisers in the proposed class action accused LinkedIn of inflating its metrics by counting video ad "views" from users' LinkedIn apps, even when videos played only off-screen because users scrolled past them.

The lawsuit began after LinkedIn said in November 2020 https://business.linkedin.com/marketing-solutions/blog/linkedin-news/2020/how-we-re-working-to-improve that its engineers had fixed software bugs that may have led to more than 418,000 overcharges, most under $25. LinkedIn said it provided credits to virtually all affected advertisers.

Judge van Keulen had in August dismissed some of the advertisers' claims while letting others proceed https://www.reuters.com/technology/linkedin-must-face-narrowed-us-lawsuit-claiming-it-overcharged-advertisers-2021-08-04.

Monday's dismissal was with prejudice, meaning the lawsuit led by advertisers TopDevz Inc of Sacramento, California, and Noirefy Inc of Chicago cannot be brought again. LinkedIn is based in Sunnyvale, California.

Lawyers for the advertisers did not immediately respond on Tuesday to requests for comment. LinkedIn and its lawyers did not immediately respond to similar requests.

The case is In re LinkedIn Advertising Metrics Litigation, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California, No. 20-08324.

(Reporting by Jonathan Stempel in New York; Editing by Dan Grebler)

Our goal is to create a safe and engaging place for users to connect over interests and passions. In order to improve our community experience, we are temporarily suspending article commenting