Advertisement
UK markets close in 2 hours 38 minutes
  • FTSE 100

    8,085.88
    +45.50 (+0.57%)
     
  • FTSE 250

    19,700.44
    -18.93 (-0.10%)
     
  • AIM

    755.22
    +0.53 (+0.07%)
     
  • GBP/EUR

    1.1663
    +0.0018 (+0.16%)
     
  • GBP/USD

    1.2474
    +0.0012 (+0.09%)
     
  • Bitcoin GBP

    50,975.12
    -2,252.79 (-4.23%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    1,358.65
    -23.92 (-1.73%)
     
  • S&P 500

    5,071.63
    +1.08 (+0.02%)
     
  • DOW

    38,460.92
    -42.77 (-0.11%)
     
  • CRUDE OIL

    83.02
    +0.21 (+0.25%)
     
  • GOLD FUTURES

    2,340.20
    +1.80 (+0.08%)
     
  • NIKKEI 225

    37,628.48
    -831.60 (-2.16%)
     
  • HANG SENG

    17,284.54
    +83.27 (+0.48%)
     
  • DAX

    17,951.22
    -137.48 (-0.76%)
     
  • CAC 40

    8,004.24
    -87.62 (-1.08%)
     

UBS fined for delayed release of price-sensitive information

The logo of Swiss bank UBS is seen in St. Moritz, Switzerland, February 10, 2017. REUTERS/Stefano Rellandini

ZURICH (Reuters) - Swiss stock exchange SIX has fined UBS (UBSG.S) 2 million Swiss ($2 million) francs for releasing price-sensitive information too late after Switzerland's highest court said it would not consider an appeal by the bank.

SIX said the fine related to UBS's announcement of a strategy change in October 2012 to scale back further in investment banking, which followed related reports in the media.

"The company was not authorized to postpone the announcement while awaiting the decision of its board of directors, i.e. until the morning of 30 October 2012, because a potentially price-sensitive fact already existed prior to the board's decision and the conditions for a postponement of disclosure were no longer given," SIX said on Wednesday.

Listed companies must immediately make an ad hoc announcement following the leak of price-sensitive information to the public, SIX said, and UBS should have made a statement no later than Oct. 29.

ADVERTISEMENT

The Swiss Federal Supreme Court's decision not to hear UBS's appeal request meant a ruling handed down by the bourse's Court of Arbitration on March 22, 2016 became final.

In an emailed statement, UBS said the Supreme Court "did apparently not recognize the significance of this case and for formal reasons did not see the necessity to establish legal clarity."

"UBS continues to believe that it was and is appropriate to issue an ad hoc announcement only after a final approval of the strategy by the Board of Directors," UBS, Switzerland's biggest bank, said in a statement.

(Reporting by Brenna Hughes Neghaiwi and Joshua Franklin. Editing by Jane Merriman)