Advertisement
UK markets close in 6 hours 53 minutes
  • FTSE 100

    7,837.16
    -39.89 (-0.51%)
     
  • FTSE 250

    19,281.80
    -168.87 (-0.87%)
     
  • AIM

    741.08
    -4.21 (-0.56%)
     
  • GBP/EUR

    1.1679
    -0.0004 (-0.03%)
     
  • GBP/USD

    1.2438
    -0.0000 (-0.00%)
     
  • Bitcoin GBP

    51,721.74
    +2,300.83 (+4.66%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    1,337.30
    +24.67 (+1.88%)
     
  • S&P 500

    5,011.12
    -11.09 (-0.22%)
     
  • DOW

    37,775.38
    +22.07 (+0.06%)
     
  • CRUDE OIL

    82.93
    +0.20 (+0.24%)
     
  • GOLD FUTURES

    2,395.90
    -2.10 (-0.09%)
     
  • NIKKEI 225

    37,068.35
    -1,011.35 (-2.66%)
     
  • HANG SENG

    16,224.14
    -161.73 (-0.99%)
     
  • DAX

    17,688.16
    -149.24 (-0.84%)
     
  • CAC 40

    7,973.36
    -49.90 (-0.62%)
     

UK's Morrisons wins legal battle over former employee's data leak

LONDON, April 1 (Reuters) - British supermarket group Morrisons on Wednesday won a Supreme Court victory which ends a battle for compensation by thousands of its staff whose personal details were posted on the internet by a former employee.

The court found that Morrisons as an employer was not "vicariously liable" for a data breach, a victory for the grocery firm which had faced compensation claims from over 9,000 former and current employees over the incident.

The case was Britain's first data leak class action.

In 2017, London's High Court found Morrisons was liable for the 2014 theft and publication of the data by finance worker Andrew Skelton, who was later jailed for his offences.

ADVERTISEMENT

But that ruling, which had also been backed by the Court of Appeal, was overturned on Wednesday by Britain's Supreme Court.

In a written judgement, one of the Supreme Court judges Robert Reed said Skelton's wrongful conduct "was not so closely connected with acts which he was authorised to do" for Morrisons to be judged liable for his actions.

"The circumstances in which Skelton committed wrongs against the claimants were not such as to result in the imposition of vicarious liability upon his employer," he wrote.

"Morrisons cannot therefore be held liable for Skelton’s conduct." (Reporting by Alistair Smout; editing by Michael Holden)