Advertisement
UK markets closed
  • FTSE 100

    8,433.76
    +52.41 (+0.63%)
     
  • FTSE 250

    20,645.38
    +114.08 (+0.56%)
     
  • AIM

    789.87
    +6.17 (+0.79%)
     
  • GBP/EUR

    1.1622
    +0.0011 (+0.09%)
     
  • GBP/USD

    1.2525
    +0.0001 (+0.01%)
     
  • Bitcoin GBP

    48,541.86
    -1,758.51 (-3.50%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    1,260.72
    -97.29 (-7.16%)
     
  • S&P 500

    5,222.68
    +8.60 (+0.16%)
     
  • DOW

    39,512.84
    +125.08 (+0.32%)
     
  • CRUDE OIL

    78.20
    -1.06 (-1.34%)
     
  • GOLD FUTURES

    2,366.90
    +26.60 (+1.14%)
     
  • NIKKEI 225

    38,229.11
    +155.13 (+0.41%)
     
  • HANG SENG

    18,963.68
    +425.87 (+2.30%)
     
  • DAX

    18,772.85
    +86.25 (+0.46%)
     
  • CAC 40

    8,219.14
    +31.49 (+0.38%)
     

US appeals court revives FDIC's bank lawsuit over Colonial collapse

NEW YORK, May 19 (Reuters) - A divided federal appeals court on Thursday revived an FDIC lawsuit accusing several major banks of helping cause the 2009 failure of Colonial BancGroup Inc by selling or underwriting toxic mortgage-backed securities that the Alabama lender bought.

By a 2-1 vote, the 2nd U.S (Other OTC: UBGXF - news) . Circuit Court of Appeals in New (KOSDAQ: 160550.KQ - news) York said the FDIC did not wait too long by waiting until August 2012, three years after it was appointed Colonial's receiver, to sue Citigroup Inc (NYSE: C - news) , JPMorgan Chase & Co (Xetra: 850628 - news) and several other banks.

The dissenting judge said the three-year clock to sue began when Colonial bought the securities in 2007, and therefore ran out in 2010. (Reporting by Jonathan Stempel in New York; Editing by Chizu Nomiyama)