UK Markets close in 5 hrs 13 mins
  • FTSE 100

    6,987.48
    -37.95 (-0.54%)
     
  • FTSE 250

    22,876.60
    -56.59 (-0.25%)
     
  • AIM

    1,230.99
    -2.69 (-0.22%)
     
  • GBP/EUR

    1.1693
    -0.0012 (-0.10%)
     
  • GBP/USD

    1.3779
    -0.0045 (-0.3266%)
     
  • BTC-GBP

    27,089.71
    -820.62 (-2.94%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    886.07
    -29.41 (-3.21%)
     
  • S&P 500

    4,422.30
    +10.51 (+0.24%)
     
  • DOW

    35,144.31
    +82.76 (+0.24%)
     
  • CRUDE OIL

    72.06
    +0.15 (+0.21%)
     
  • GOLD FUTURES

    1,796.30
    -2.90 (-0.16%)
     
  • NIKKEI 225

    27,970.22
    +136.93 (+0.49%)
     
  • HANG SENG

    25,086.43
    -1,105.89 (-4.22%)
     
  • DAX

    15,525.89
    -93.09 (-0.60%)
     
  • CAC 40

    6,550.49
    -28.11 (-0.43%)
     

NCAA news: Victory for college athletes as Supreme Court rules they can benefit from ‘fair market rate’

·2-min read
APTOPIX WCWS UCLA Oklahoma Softball (Copyright 2021 The Associated Press. All rights reserved.)
APTOPIX WCWS UCLA Oklahoma Softball (Copyright 2021 The Associated Press. All rights reserved.)

The Supreme Court delivered a major victory for college athletes on Monday in a ruling that found the NCAA’s limits on education-related benefits to students to be illegal.

In a unanimous ruling, the nation’s highest court found that the NCAA must allow colleges to offer benefits including internships, tutoring, and free educational materials including computers without any limits; previously, the organization capped such enticements at $5,000 per student per year.

Justice Neil Gorsuch delivered the court’s majority opinion, while Justice Brett Kavanaugh delivered a concurring opinion.

In his opinion, Justice Kavanaugh accused the NCAA of building “a massive money-raising enterprise on the backs of student athletes who are not fairly compensated”, adding, “The NCAA is not above the law”.

“Nowhere else in America can businesses get away with agreeing not to pay their workers a fair market rate on the theory that their product is defined by not paying their workers a fair market rate. And under ordinary principles of antitrust law, it is not evident why college sports should be any different,” wrote Justice Kavanaugh.

The court did note, however, that while the NCAA itself is prohibited on placing limits on education-related benefits, it may still limit gifts that do not relate to a student athlete’s education.

The justices also agreed with a lower court ruling noting that the prohibition only applies to the NCAA itself, and not individual member conferences, which they specified “remain free to reimpose every single enjoined restraint tomorrow—or more restrictive ones still.”

NCAA officials did not immediately return a request for comment from The Independent.

Compensation for student athletes has become a major point of contention between league officials and some players in recent years, as advocates for students argue that young athletes play a role in making thousands if not millions of dollars for their respective institutions and often receive little in return, especially given that scholarships often are contingent on players remaining eligible through their four years of college.

Read More

Watch live as Joe Biden signs Juneteenth National Independence Day Act

High court sides with former athletes in dispute with NCAA

Trump cowboy seeks 2nd act in politics after Capitol breach

Our goal is to create a safe and engaging place for users to connect over interests and passions. In order to improve our community experience, we are temporarily suspending article commenting