Advertisement
UK markets closed
  • FTSE 100

    8,433.76
    +52.41 (+0.63%)
     
  • FTSE 250

    20,645.38
    +114.08 (+0.56%)
     
  • AIM

    789.87
    +6.17 (+0.79%)
     
  • GBP/EUR

    1.1629
    +0.0018 (+0.15%)
     
  • GBP/USD

    1.2531
    +0.0007 (+0.05%)
     
  • Bitcoin GBP

    48,697.51
    -1,211.32 (-2.43%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    1,263.64
    -94.37 (-6.96%)
     
  • S&P 500

    5,216.61
    +2.53 (+0.05%)
     
  • DOW

    39,477.09
    +89.33 (+0.23%)
     
  • CRUDE OIL

    78.62
    -0.64 (-0.81%)
     
  • GOLD FUTURES

    2,370.60
    +30.30 (+1.29%)
     
  • NIKKEI 225

    38,229.11
    +155.13 (+0.41%)
     
  • HANG SENG

    18,963.68
    +425.87 (+2.30%)
     
  • DAX

    18,772.85
    +86.25 (+0.46%)
     
  • CAC 40

    8,219.14
    +31.49 (+0.38%)
     

Vodafone faces German probe over suspected obstruction of 1&1

FILE PHOTO: A woman walks past a Vodafone store in Ronda

BERLIN (Reuters) -Vodafone and its German subsidiary Vantage Towers are facing an antitrust investigation in Germany over concerns that it may have contributed to United Internet subsidiary 1&1's sluggish roll-out of radio masts, the regulator said on Friday.

"Powerful and dominant companies must not unfairly impede other companies. We will therefore scrutinise whether there are sound reasons for a delay in the provision of antenna locations for 1&1," Andreas Mundt, president of the Federal Cartel Office, said in a statement.

Vodafone said in an emailed statement to Reuters that it continued to firmly reject the accusation and would cooperate closely with the authorities.

"As a neutral and independent host, we offer all our customers open access to our passive infrastructure," a spokesperson for Vantage Towers said.

ADVERTISEMENT

1&1 is trying to establish itself as a top telecommunications provider in Germany but has so far built only a fraction of its targeted 1,000 radio masts.

In February, it filed a complaint with the cartel office, blaming the slow progress on Vantage Towers and claiming that the company had not fulfilled its obligations as a partner in developing shared infrastructure.

(Reporting by Rachel More and Hakan Ersen, Editing by Friederike Heine)