Advertisement
UK markets open in 2 hours 50 minutes
  • NIKKEI 225

    38,274.84
    +0.79 (+0.00%)
     
  • HANG SENG

    18,153.68
    +390.65 (+2.20%)
     
  • CRUDE OIL

    79.46
    +0.46 (+0.58%)
     
  • GOLD FUTURES

    2,328.80
    +17.80 (+0.77%)
     
  • DOW

    37,903.29
    +87.37 (+0.23%)
     
  • Bitcoin GBP

    45,829.72
    -2,214.21 (-4.61%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    1,261.52
    -77.55 (-5.79%)
     
  • NASDAQ Composite

    15,605.48
    -52.34 (-0.33%)
     
  • UK FTSE All Share

    4,418.60
    -11.65 (-0.26%)
     

In the wake of Bristol-Myers Squibb Company's (NYSE:BMY) latest US$5.7b market cap drop, institutional owners may be forced to take severe actions

Key Insights

  • Institutions' substantial holdings in Bristol-Myers Squibb implies that they have significant influence over the company's share price

  • 48% of the business is held by the top 25 shareholders

  • Ownership research along with analyst forecasts data help provide a good understanding of opportunities in a stock

To get a sense of who is truly in control of Bristol-Myers Squibb Company (NYSE:BMY), it is important to understand the ownership structure of the business. With 78% stake, institutions possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

As a result, institutional investors endured the highest losses last week after market cap fell by US$5.7b. Needless to say, the recent loss which further adds to the one-year loss to shareholders of 29% might not go down well especially with this category of shareholders. Often called “market movers", institutions wield significant power in influencing the price dynamics of any stock. As a result, if the downtrend continues, institutions may face pressures to sell Bristol-Myers Squibb, which might have negative implications on individual investors.

ADVERTISEMENT

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Bristol-Myers Squibb.

Check out our latest analysis for Bristol-Myers Squibb

ownership-breakdown
ownership-breakdown

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Bristol-Myers Squibb?

Institutional investors commonly compare their own returns to the returns of a commonly followed index. So they generally do consider buying larger companies that are included in the relevant benchmark index.

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Bristol-Myers Squibb. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Bristol-Myers Squibb's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

earnings-and-revenue-growth
earnings-and-revenue-growth

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. Hedge funds don't have many shares in Bristol-Myers Squibb. The company's largest shareholder is The Vanguard Group, Inc., with ownership of 9.8%. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 8.3% and 4.4% of the stock.

On studying our ownership data, we found that 25 of the top shareholders collectively own less than 50% of the share register, implying that no single individual has a majority interest.

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. Quite a few analysts cover the stock, so you could look into forecast growth quite easily.

Insider Ownership Of Bristol-Myers Squibb

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

I generally consider insider ownership to be a good thing. However, on some occasions it makes it more difficult for other shareholders to hold the board accountable for decisions.

Our information suggests that Bristol-Myers Squibb Company insiders own under 1% of the company. As it is a large company, we'd only expect insiders to own a small percentage of it. But it's worth noting that they own US$71m worth of shares. It is always good to see at least some insider ownership, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

General Public Ownership

With a 22% ownership, the general public, mostly comprising of individual investors, have some degree of sway over Bristol-Myers Squibb. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

Next Steps:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Case in point: We've spotted 1 warning sign for Bristol-Myers Squibb you should be aware of.

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.