Advertisement
UK markets close in 12 minutes
  • FTSE 100

    8,269.34
    +64.23 (+0.78%)
     
  • FTSE 250

    20,498.12
    +117.07 (+0.57%)
     
  • AIM

    772.54
    -4.96 (-0.64%)
     
  • GBP/EUR

    1.1830
    -0.0004 (-0.03%)
     
  • GBP/USD

    1.2680
    -0.0042 (-0.33%)
     
  • Bitcoin GBP

    51,246.30
    -93.64 (-0.18%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    1,348.55
    -34.12 (-2.47%)
     
  • S&P 500

    5,497.56
    +10.53 (+0.19%)
     
  • DOW

    38,930.52
    +95.66 (+0.25%)
     
  • CRUDE OIL

    82.31
    +0.74 (+0.91%)
     
  • GOLD FUTURES

    2,378.40
    +31.50 (+1.34%)
     
  • NIKKEI 225

    38,633.02
    +62.26 (+0.16%)
     
  • HANG SENG

    18,335.32
    -95.07 (-0.52%)
     
  • DAX

    18,240.31
    +172.40 (+0.95%)
     
  • CAC 40

    7,678.80
    +108.60 (+1.43%)
     

While institutions own 28% of Metals X Limited (ASX:MLX), retail investors are its largest shareholders with 42% ownership

Key Insights

  • Metals X's significant retail investors ownership suggests that the key decisions are influenced by shareholders from the larger public

  • A total of 7 investors have a majority stake in the company with 51% ownership

  • 28% of Metals X is held by Institutions

If you want to know who really controls Metals X Limited (ASX:MLX), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. With 42% stake, retail investors possess the maximum shares in the company. Put another way, the group faces the maximum upside potential (or downside risk).

Meanwhile, institutions make up 28% of the company’s shareholders. Institutions often own shares in more established companies, while it's not unusual to see insiders own a fair bit of smaller companies.

ADVERTISEMENT

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Metals X, beginning with the chart below.

See our latest analysis for Metals X

ownership-breakdown
ownership-breakdown

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Metals X?

Institutions typically measure themselves against a benchmark when reporting to their own investors, so they often become more enthusiastic about a stock once it's included in a major index. We would expect most companies to have some institutions on the register, especially if they are growing.

We can see that Metals X does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This can indicate that the company has a certain degree of credibility in the investment community. However, it is best to be wary of relying on the supposed validation that comes with institutional investors. They too, get it wrong sometimes. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Metals X, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

earnings-and-revenue-growth
earnings-and-revenue-growth

We note that hedge funds don't have a meaningful investment in Metals X. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is APAC Resources Limited with 22% of shares outstanding. Meanwhile, the second and third largest shareholders, hold 8.8% and 5.2%, of the shares outstanding, respectively.

We did some more digging and found that 7 of the top shareholders account for roughly 51% of the register, implying that along with larger shareholders, there are a few smaller shareholders, thereby balancing out each others interests somewhat.

Researching institutional ownership is a good way to gauge and filter a stock's expected performance. The same can be achieved by studying analyst sentiments. There is some analyst coverage of the stock, but it could still become more well known, with time.

Insider Ownership Of Metals X

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

Shareholders would probably be interested to learn that insiders own shares in Metals X Limited. It has a market capitalization of just AU$417m, and insiders have AU$15m worth of shares, in their own names. Some would say this shows alignment of interests between shareholders and the board. But it might be worth checking if those insiders have been selling.

General Public Ownership

The general public, who are usually individual investors, hold a 42% stake in Metals X. While this group can't necessarily call the shots, it can certainly have a real influence on how the company is run.

Private Company Ownership

We can see that Private Companies own 4.9%, of the shares on issue. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.

Public Company Ownership

It appears to us that public companies own 22% of Metals X. This may be a strategic interest and the two companies may have related business interests. It could be that they have de-merged. This holding is probably worth investigating further.

Next Steps:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 2 warning signs with Metals X , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.