Advertisement
UK markets open in 5 hours 48 minutes
  • NIKKEI 225

    39,608.24
    -22.82 (-0.06%)
     
  • HANG SENG

    17,718.61
    +2.11 (+0.01%)
     
  • CRUDE OIL

    83.50
    +0.12 (+0.14%)
     
  • GOLD FUTURES

    2,342.40
    +3.50 (+0.15%)
     
  • DOW

    39,169.52
    +50.66 (+0.13%)
     
  • Bitcoin GBP

    49,698.08
    -367.55 (-0.73%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    1,342.41
    +40.34 (+3.10%)
     
  • NASDAQ Composite

    17,879.30
    +146.70 (+0.83%)
     
  • UK FTSE All Share

    4,451.48
    -0.44 (-0.01%)
     

While institutions own 32% of Kodal Minerals PLC (LON:KOD), individual investors are its largest shareholders with 51% ownership

Key Insights

  • Significant control over Kodal Minerals by individual investors implies that the general public has more power to influence management and governance-related decisions

  • 48% of the business is held by the top 25 shareholders

  • Insiders have sold recently

If you want to know who really controls Kodal Minerals PLC (LON:KOD), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. And the group that holds the biggest piece of the pie are individual investors with 51% ownership. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

And institutions on the other hand have a 32% ownership in the company. Insiders often own a large chunk of younger, smaller, companies while huge companies tend to have institutions as shareholders.

ADVERTISEMENT

Let's delve deeper into each type of owner of Kodal Minerals, beginning with the chart below.

See our latest analysis for Kodal Minerals

ownership-breakdown
ownership-breakdown

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Kodal Minerals?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

We can see that Kodal Minerals does have institutional investors; and they hold a good portion of the company's stock. This implies the analysts working for those institutions have looked at the stock and they like it. But just like anyone else, they could be wrong. It is not uncommon to see a big share price drop if two large institutional investors try to sell out of a stock at the same time. So it is worth checking the past earnings trajectory of Kodal Minerals, (below). Of course, keep in mind that there are other factors to consider, too.

earnings-and-revenue-growth
earnings-and-revenue-growth

Hedge funds don't have many shares in Kodal Minerals. Our data shows that Suay Chin International Pte. Ltd. is the largest shareholder with 14% of shares outstanding. With 8.5% and 4.8% of the shares outstanding respectively, HBOS Investment Fund Managers Limited and A J Bell Holdings Limited, Asset Management Arm are the second and third largest shareholders. Additionally, the company's CEO Bernard Aylward directly holds 1.5% of the total shares outstanding.

Our studies suggest that the top 25 shareholders collectively control less than half of the company's shares, meaning that the company's shares are widely disseminated and there is no dominant shareholder.

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. While there is some analyst coverage, the company is probably not widely covered. So it could gain more attention, down the track.

Insider Ownership Of Kodal Minerals

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

We can see that insiders own shares in Kodal Minerals PLC. In their own names, insiders own UK£3.6m worth of stock in the UK£134m company. It is good to see some investment by insiders, but we usually like to see higher insider holdings. It might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.

General Public Ownership

The general public -- including retail investors -- own 51% of Kodal Minerals. With this amount of ownership, retail investors can collectively play a role in decisions that affect shareholder returns, such as dividend policies and the appointment of directors. They can also exercise the power to vote on acquisitions or mergers that may not improve profitability.

Private Company Ownership

We can see that Private Companies own 15%, of the shares on issue. It's hard to draw any conclusions from this fact alone, so its worth looking into who owns those private companies. Sometimes insiders or other related parties have an interest in shares in a public company through a separate private company.

Next Steps:

While it is well worth considering the different groups that own a company, there are other factors that are even more important. Case in point: We've spotted 5 warning signs for Kodal Minerals you should be aware of, and 3 of them are concerning.

But ultimately it is the future, not the past, that will determine how well the owners of this business will do. Therefore we think it advisable to take a look at this free report showing whether analysts are predicting a brighter future.

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

Join A Paid User Research Session
You’ll receive a US$30 Amazon Gift card for 1 hour of your time while helping us build better investing tools for the individual investors like yourself. Sign up here