UK markets open in 2 hours 21 minutes
  • NIKKEI 225

    28,858.75
    -396.80 (-1.36%)
     
  • HANG SENG

    26,060.26
    -75.76 (-0.29%)
     
  • CRUDE OIL

    84.25
    +0.38 (+0.45%)
     
  • GOLD FUTURES

    1,786.10
    +1.20 (+0.07%)
     
  • DOW

    35,609.34
    +152.03 (+0.43%)
     
  • BTC-GBP

    46,921.10
    +442.75 (+0.95%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    1,530.16
    +49.36 (+3.33%)
     
  • ^IXIC

    15,121.68
    -7.41 (-0.05%)
     
  • ^FTAS

    4,118.78
    -0.40 (-0.01%)
     

Women Can Avoid Pregnancy With Sexual Abstinence, Texas Law Creator Preaches In Brief

·2-min read

The key architect of the radical new Texas anti-abortion law has argued in a U.S. Supreme Court brief that women can avoid pregnancy by simply avoiding sex.

The stunning argument was presented by attorney Jonathan Mitchell in a friend-of-the-court brief this summer supporting a restrictive Mississippi law denying women the right to an abortion after 15 weeks of pregnancy. The brief also argued that Roe v. Wade should be overruled.

“Women can ‘control their reproductive lives’ without access to abortion; they can do so by refraining from sexual intercourse,” Mitchell, a former Texas solicitor general, lectured in the brief, which was first reported by The Guardian.

Mitchell and co-counsel Adam Mortara (a former clerk for conservative Justice Clarence Thomas), also noted in the brief that women have the option to travel to other states with different laws to obtain an abortion. “Indigent women” could avail themselves of “abortion funds” to help them with costs, the brief claimed.

As for women’s sexual behavior, “one can imagine a scenario in which a woman has chosen to engage in unprotected (or insufficiently protected) sexual intercourse on the assumption that an abortion will be available to her later,” the brief noted. “But when this court announces the overruling of Roe that individual can simply change their behavior ... if she no longer wants to take the risk of an unwanted pregnancy.”

The “only time abortion is needed to ensure women’s ability to ‘control their reproduction lives’ is when a pregnancy results from non-consensual behavior, as in cases of rape, or when a pregnancy is endangering her life,” Mitchell added. Texas Gov. Greg Abbott (R) vowed earlier this month that he would somehow “eliminate all rapists” from the streets of his state.

The amicus brief was filed on behalf of the right-wing evangelical Texas Right to Life group, a key proponent and expected enforcer of the new Texas law.

The law bans women from having an abortion — even in cases of rape and incest — after six weeks of pregnancy, when many women are not aware yet that they are pregnant. About 90% of abortions in Texas were obtained after six weeks of pregnancy before the law was signed. The Supreme Court voted Sept. 1 not to immediately block the law.

To enforce the law, Texas has set up a bounty system for vigilantes who can collect $10,000 if they win a lawsuit filed against anyone who “aids and abets” an abortion — from a doctor to a friend who drives someone to a clinic. Texas Right to Life set up a reporting form for wannabe enforcers but has been bounced from two internet service providers for violating privacy requirements.

The Department of Justice filed a lawsuit earlier this month against Texas, arguing that the law violates the U.S. Constitution.

This article originally appeared on HuffPost and has been updated.

Related...

Our goal is to create a safe and engaging place for users to connect over interests and passions. In order to improve our community experience, we are temporarily suspending article commenting