I heard about MS the other day on (http://Stocks-tracker.com). It’s looking like an interesting play.
f
JB trying to fix this, GOP will oppose:
"WASHINGTON — The wealthiest 1 percent of Americans are the nation’s most egregious tax evaders, failing to pay as much as $163 billion in owed taxes per year, according to a new Treasury Department report released on Wednesday. (1)
The analysis comes as the Biden administration is pushing lawmakers to embrace its ambitious proposal to beef up the Internal Revenue Service to narrow the “tax gap,” which it estimates amounts to $7 trillion in unpaid taxes over a decade. The White House has proposed investing $80 billion in the agency over the next 10 years to hire more enforcement staff, overhaul its technology and usher in new information-reporting requirements that would give the government greater insight into tax evasion schemes."
B
Need to chill. China is not the USA
B
Is this not supposed to be a board about MS???
f
"According to statistics provided by the Texas Attorney General’s Office, there is no evidence of widespread voter fraud in the state dating back to 2004. In total, between 2004 and March 2021, the state charged 154 people with 534 counts related to possible voter fraud.
A report from local ABC-affiliated news station KVUE-TV compared the fraud-related charges brought in the state to the total number of votes cast over that period and concluded that “approximately 0.0006% of the votes cast in that time frame resulted in a prosecution case being resolved.”
Further evincing the dearth of evidence indicating widespread voter fraud, Texas Lt. Governor Dan Patrick (R) in November offered a reward of up to $1 million from his campaign account for “whistleblowers and tipsters” from anywhere in the nation that were able to come forward with evidence of voter fraud. There is no evidence that Patrick has paid out any reward money. His office did not immediately respond to an email from Law&Crime seeking clarification as to how many people, if any, received reward money for providing evidence of voter fraud."
A
Is Nikki Minaj a rightwinger?
M
Dear Morgan Stanley,
I am writing to in concern that you own almost 10 Billion Dollars worth of Shopify. Although you've done well with the investment all the insiders are starting to sell their shares at an alarming rate. Just two minutes of research and anyone can see that this is seriously over priced. You need to sell all your shares in Shopify before the share price crashes.
Joe.
A
John Durham is alive and well....who would've known!
f
The concept of CHOICE:
"Reasonable people can disagree about when a zygote becomes a "human life" -- that's a philosophical question. However, regardless of whether or not one believes a fetus is ethically equivalent to an adult, it doesn't obligate a mother to sacrifice her body autonomy for another, innocent or not.
"Body autonomy is a critical component of the right to privacy protected by the Constitution, as decided in Griswold v. Connecticut (1965), McFall v. Shimp (1978), and of course Roe v. Wade (1973). Consider a scenario where you are a perfect bone marrow match for a child with severe aplastic anemia; no other person on earth is a close enough match to save the child's life, and the child will certainly die without a bone marrow transplant from you. If you decided that you did not want to donate your marrow to save the child, for whatever reason, the state cannot demand the use of any part of your body for something to which you do not consent. It doesn't matter if the procedure required to complete the donation is trivial, or if the rationale for refusing is flimsy and arbitrary, or if the procedure is the only hope the child has to survive, or if the child is a genius or a saint or anything else -- the decision to donate must be voluntary to be constitutional. This right is even extended to a person's body after they die; if they did not voluntarily commit to donate their organs while alive, their organs cannot be harvested after death, regardless of how useless those organs are to the deceased or how many lives they would save.
"That's the law.
"Use of a woman's uterus to save a life is no different from use of her bone marrow to save a life -- it must be offered voluntarily. By all means, profess your belief that providing one's uterus to save the child is morally just, and refusing is morally wrong. That is a defensible philosophical position, regardless of who agrees and who disagrees. But legally, it must be the woman's choice to carry out the pregnancy. She may choose to carry the baby to term. She may choose not to. Either decision could be made for all the right reasons, all the wrong reasons, or anything in between. But it must be her choice, and protecting the right of body autonomy means the law is on her side.
"Supporting that precedent is what being pro-choice means."
A
Is Sandy Cortez from West Chester really working class?
A
Sincere question....how is Joe's approval rate at 41%? Is this more bogus polling?
A
Hillary, Joe, Barack, Comey, and friends...can you hear him knockin....
f
"The #1 State In Covid Deaths Per Capita Is No Longer New Jersey Or New York
It is now Mississippi.
And Louisiana is 3rd, and will likely overtake NJ before too long.
Eventually, the top 5 states are all going to be Red states as AZ, AL & AR are closing in fast."
f
"September 10, 2021
(CNN) Federal prosecutors cited seditious conspiracy as a crime under investigation in a recent search that appears to be related to the US Capitol riot probe, according to a court document supporting the search.
The move, made known through the iPhone search of the Oath Keepers-linked Texas lawyer Kellye SoRelle, again raises the possibility that the Justice Department could be considering use of the provocative charge.
Sedition has not been used against any of the more than 600 Capitol riot federal criminal defendants, and is rarely charged. But the possibility of federal authorities attempting to use it as a legal hammer in response to the insurrection has hung over the investigation since the former acting DC US attorney first announced it was under consideration."
J
Sadly none of the recent comments have any relevance to Morgan Stanley. So what do u guys think of MS over the next 12 months as far as price and the dividend?
J
I believe 105 is excellent price to sell.
f
"The Economist
"There is growing evidence that Hillary Clinton was on to something a decade ago when she said: “The subjugation of women is...a threat to the common security of our world”
*Article from The Economist:
Why nations that fail women fail. And why foreign policy should pay more heed to half of humanity
**** Hillary Clinton's message of her iconic speech addressing Woman in 1995 Bejing to her call for Supreme Court warnings in her 2016 campaign & throughout her career & her associations advocating for policy or messaging & organizing to today, yes it appears "She was on to something".
Well gee thanks Economist, for finally noticing."
D
MS failed during housing meltdown and was bailed out by the government’s to big to fail policy.
r
Do you think the stock will split shares soon
D
waiting for a big pullback to get back in. I sold on the rise near 100, unfortunately
"WASHINGTON — The wealthiest 1 percent of Americans are the nation’s most egregious tax evaders, failing to pay as much as $163 billion in owed taxes per year, according to a new Treasury Department report released on Wednesday. (1)
The analysis comes as the Biden administration is pushing lawmakers to embrace its ambitious proposal to beef up the Internal Revenue Service to narrow the “tax gap,” which it estimates amounts to $7 trillion in unpaid taxes over a decade. The White House has proposed investing $80 billion in the agency over the next 10 years to hire more enforcement staff, overhaul its technology and usher in new information-reporting requirements that would give the government greater insight into tax evasion schemes."
A report from local ABC-affiliated news station KVUE-TV compared the fraud-related charges brought in the state to the total number of votes cast over that period and concluded that “approximately 0.0006% of the votes cast in that time frame resulted in a prosecution case being resolved.”
Further evincing the dearth of evidence indicating widespread voter fraud, Texas Lt. Governor Dan Patrick (R) in November offered a reward of up to $1 million from his campaign account for “whistleblowers and tipsters” from anywhere in the nation that were able to come forward with evidence of voter fraud. There is no evidence that Patrick has paid out any reward money. His office did not immediately respond to an email from Law&Crime seeking clarification as to how many people, if any, received reward money for providing evidence of voter fraud."
I am writing to in concern that you own almost 10 Billion Dollars worth of Shopify. Although you've done well with the investment all the insiders are starting to sell their shares at an alarming rate. Just two minutes of research and anyone can see that this is seriously over priced. You need to sell all your shares in Shopify before the share price crashes.
Joe.
"Reasonable people can disagree about when a zygote becomes a "human life" -- that's a philosophical question. However, regardless of whether or not one believes a fetus is ethically equivalent to an adult, it doesn't obligate a mother to sacrifice her body autonomy for another, innocent or not.
"Body autonomy is a critical component of the right to privacy protected by the Constitution, as decided in Griswold v. Connecticut (1965), McFall v. Shimp (1978), and of course Roe v. Wade (1973). Consider a scenario where you are a perfect bone marrow match for a child with severe aplastic anemia; no other person on earth is a close enough match to save the child's life, and the child will certainly die without a bone marrow transplant from you. If you decided that you did not want to donate your marrow to save the child, for whatever reason, the state cannot demand the use of any part of your body for something to which you do not consent. It doesn't matter if the procedure required to complete the donation is trivial, or if the rationale for refusing is flimsy and arbitrary, or if the procedure is the only hope the child has to survive, or if the child is a genius or a saint or anything else -- the decision to donate must be voluntary to be constitutional. This right is even extended to a person's body after they die; if they did not voluntarily commit to donate their organs while alive, their organs cannot be harvested after death, regardless of how useless those organs are to the deceased or how many lives they would save.
"That's the law.
"Use of a woman's uterus to save a life is no different from use of her bone marrow to save a life -- it must be offered voluntarily. By all means, profess your belief that providing one's uterus to save the child is morally just, and refusing is morally wrong. That is a defensible philosophical position, regardless of who agrees and who disagrees. But legally, it must be the woman's choice to carry out the pregnancy. She may choose to carry the baby to term. She may choose not to. Either decision could be made for all the right reasons, all the wrong reasons, or anything in between. But it must be her choice, and protecting the right of body autonomy means the law is on her side.
"Supporting that precedent is what being pro-choice means."
It is now Mississippi.
And Louisiana is 3rd, and will likely overtake NJ before too long.
Eventually, the top 5 states are all going to be Red states as AZ, AL & AR are closing in fast."
(CNN) Federal prosecutors cited seditious conspiracy as a crime under investigation in a recent search that appears to be related to the US Capitol riot probe, according to a court document supporting the search.
The move, made known through the iPhone search of the Oath Keepers-linked Texas lawyer Kellye SoRelle, again raises the possibility that the Justice Department could be considering use of the provocative charge.
Sedition has not been used against any of the more than 600 Capitol riot federal criminal defendants, and is rarely charged. But the possibility of federal authorities attempting to use it as a legal hammer in response to the insurrection has hung over the investigation since the former acting DC US attorney first announced it was under consideration."
"There is growing evidence that Hillary Clinton was on to something a decade ago when she said: “The subjugation of women is...a threat to the common security of our world”
*Article from The Economist:
Why nations that fail women fail.
And why foreign policy should pay more heed to half of humanity
https://amp.economist.com/leaders/2021/09/11/why-nations-that-fail-women-fail?__twitter_impression=true
****
Hillary Clinton's message of her iconic speech addressing Woman in 1995 Bejing to her call for Supreme Court warnings in her 2016 campaign & throughout her career & her associations advocating for policy or messaging & organizing to today, yes it appears "She was on to something".
Well gee thanks Economist, for finally noticing."