UK markets open in 57 minutes

GOOGL Jun 2021 1205.000 put

OPR - OPR Delayed price. Currency in USD
Add to watchlist
7.200.00 (0.00%)
As of 11:58AM EST. Market open.
Full screen
Previous close7.20
Open7.20
Bid3.30
Ask5.50
Strike1,205.00
Expiry date2021-06-18
Day's range13.53 - 13.60
Contract rangeN/A
Volume2
Open interest79
  • Governments need more money to fight Google antitrust cases, lawyer tells Congress
    Editor's pick
    Yahoo Finance

    Governments need more money to fight Google antitrust cases, lawyer tells Congress

    The power of Big Tech to tamp down potential business rivals stretches all the way into the courtroom, one witness told lawmakers Thursday during testimony before the House Judiciary Subcommittee on Antitrust. John Thorne, a partner with the law firm Kellogg, Hansen, Todd, Figel & Fredrick, testified that the Justice Department (DOJ) and state prosecutors lack the resources necessary to effectively enforce their antitrust laws and cases now pending against Google.

  • Judge in Google Case Disturbed That Even ‘Incognito’ Users Are Tracked
    Bloomberg

    Judge in Google Case Disturbed That Even ‘Incognito’ Users Are Tracked

    (Bloomberg) -- When Google users browse in “Incognito” mode, just how hidden is their activity?The Alphabet Inc. unit says activating the stealth mode in Chrome, or “private browsing” in other browsers, means the company won’t “remember your activity.” But a judge with a history of taking Silicon Valley giants to task about their data collection raised doubts Thursday about whether Google is being as forthright as it needs to be about the personal information it’s collecting from users.At a hearing Thursday in San Jose, California, U.S. District Judge Lucy Koh said she’s “disturbed” by Google’s data collection practices in a class-action lawsuit that describes the company’s private browsing promises as a “ruse” and seeks $5,000 in damages for each of the millions of people whose privacy has been compromised since June of 2016.Weighing Google’s attempt to get the suit dismissed, Koh said she finds it “unusual” that the company would make the “extra effort” of data collection if it doesn’t use the information to build user profiles or targeted advertising.Google has become a target antitrust complaints in the last year filed by state and federal officials -- as well as businesses -- accusing it of abusing its dominance in digital advertising and online search. Koh has a deeper history with the company as a vocal critic of its privacy policies. She forced Google in one notable case to disclose its scanning of emails to build profiles and target advertising.Read More: Google Says Incognito Doesn’t Mean Invisible in Bid to Toss SuitIn this case, Google is accused of relying on pieces of its code within websites that use its analytics and advertising services to scrape users’ supposedly private browsing history and send copies of it to Google’s servers.Google makes it seem like private browsing mode gives users more control of their data, Amanda Bonn, a lawyer representing users, told Koh. In reality, “Google is saying there’s basically very little you can do to prevent us from collecting your data, and that’s what you should assume we’re doing,” Bonn said.Andrew Schapiro, a lawyer for Google, argued the company’s privacy policy “expressly discloses” its practices. “The data collection at issue is disclosed,” he said.Another lawyer for Google, Stephen Broome, said website owners who contract with the company to use its analytics or other services are well aware of the data collection described in the suit.Broome’s attempt to downplay the privacy concerns by pointing out that the federal court system’s own website uses Google services ended up backfiring.The judge demanded an explanation “about what exactly Google does,” while voicing concern that visitors to the court’s website are unwittingly disclosing information to the company.“I want a declaration from Google on what information they’re collecting on users to the court’s website, and what that’s used for,” Koh told the company’s lawyers.The case is Brown v. Google, 20-cv-03664, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California (San Jose).For more articles like this, please visit us at bloomberg.comSubscribe now to stay ahead with the most trusted business news source.©2021 Bloomberg L.P.

  • Facebook switches news back on in Australia, signs content deals
    Reuters

    Facebook switches news back on in Australia, signs content deals

    Facebook Inc ended a one-week blackout of Australian news on its popular social media site on Friday and announced preliminary commercial agreements with three small local publishers. The moves reflected easing tensions between the U.S. company and the Australian government, a day after the country's parliament passed a law forcing it and Alphabet Inc's Google to pay local media companies for using content on their platforms. The new law makes Australia the first nation where a government arbitrator can set the price Facebook and Google pay domestic media to show their content if private negotiations fail.