14.69 -0.01 (-0.07%)
After hours: 5:24PM EST
|Bid||14.63 x 900|
|Ask||14.71 x 1800|
|Day's range||14.69 - 15.73|
|52-week range||14.69 - 31.39|
|Beta (5Y monthly)||0.75|
|PE ratio (TTM)||6.86|
|Forward dividend & yield||0.97 (6.31%)|
|Ex-dividend date||06 Jan 2020|
|1y target est||N/A|
The sector's quarterly reports are likely to reflect benefits from constant omnichannel initiatives, brand introduction, store expansion and remodeling, and efforts to enhance delivery services.
Columbia Sportswear's (COLM) fourth-quarter 2019 results are likely to reflect gains from the DTC business and Project CONNECT. However, increased investments might have hurt earnings.
Prestige Consumer's (PBH) third-quarter fiscal 2020 results are likely to reflect gains from the International unit. However, weakness in the North America unit and currency woes are concerning.
Impacts of soft innerwear segment and currency woes are likely to get reflected in Hanesbrands' (HBI) Q4 results. Nevertheless, strength in Champions brand and Project Booster plan bode well.
Skechers' (SKX) focus on new lines of products, cost-containment efforts, inventory management and global distribution platform is likely to show on fourth-quarter performance.
Unfavorable currency movements, soft margins and weakness in Kate Spade brand are likely to have impacted Tapestry's (TPR) Q2 results. Management expects high-single-digit decline in Kate Spade comps.
Impacts of soft SBS unit and higher SG&A costs are likely to get reflected in Sally Beauty's (SBH) first-quarter fiscal 2020 results. Nevertheless, the Transformation Plan and supply-chain efforts bode well.
Gap (GPS) has an impressive earnings surprise history and currently possesses the right combination of the two key ingredients for a likely beat in its next quarterly report.
Capri Holdings (CPRI) expects low single digit increase in comparable store sales but lower operating margin at Michael Kors in the third quarter.
(Bloomberg Opinion) -- L Brands Inc. is emerging as one of the companies most damaged by the MeToo era.The Wall Street Journal reported on Wednesday that billionaire Leslie Wexner, the founder of the retail group, was in discussions to step aside as chief executive. At the same time, the company is exploring alternatives for Victoria’s Secret — its once prized and now struggling lingerie chain — including a full or partial sale, the Journal said.Both are key moments for L Brands. Wexner, the longest-serving CEO in the S&P 500 Index, built up the company over decades, but had drawn attention for his association with the late financier Jeffery Epstein, who died while under arrest facing sex-trafficking charges. Meanwhile, Victoria’s Secret’s oversexed image looks incongruous against the new mood in fashion and luxury. Famed for its opulent catwalk shows, the chain canceled the event last year, and analysts at Jefferies said recently that the brand was becoming “irrelevant.”Victoria’s Secret certainly is in need of a radical revamp; the group has already begun this process, introducing new products, and updating its marketing. But these moves haven’t yet paid off. L Brands reported disappointing holiday sales, and cut its profit guidance, with same-store sales at Victoria’s Secret falling 12% in November and December.A more far-reaching overhaul for Victoria’s Secret is necessary, aligning its lingerie more closely with changing consumer tastes, emphasizing inclusivity and different body shapes, which could help it attract a younger customer. Athletic wear and beauty also offer more opportunities. But it also needs to cut back on discounting and likely close a large swath of its 1,200 stores. These steps are painful, and would better much better carried out in the private sector, away from the scrutiny of quarterly earnings.It’s hard to put a value on the business. It had sales $7.4 billion in 2019. But Jamie Merriman, analyst at Bernstein, said that profitability is close to zero. Consequently, she ascribes no value to the business. Any potential buyer will need to invest significantly as well as bear the cost of store closures. Debt will also need to be apportioned, which could affect a new owner’s ability to borrow.So L Brands won’t be able to count on a big pay-day from ridding itself of what was once a coveted brand. It should benefit, however, from being able to concentrate on Bath & Body Works, which is thriving and could deliver more value to shareholders. Merriman estimates Bath & Body Works could command an enterprise value of $11.4 billion, based on a valuation assumption of nine times earnings before interest and tax. Subtracting debt of $4.7 billion, would give an equity value of $6.7 billion, above L Brands’ $5.7 billion market value as of the close of trading Tuesday. This helps explain why L Brands’ shares surged 13 percent on the news in early trading Wednesday. But investors should be wary on two counts. First, Victoria’s Secret wouldn’t be an easy deal for private equity, given the scale of the challenges. Second, investors should be mindful of the situation at Gap Inc., which intended to split into two companies, one containing its namesake brand and the other the faster-growing Old Navy. It ended up ditching this plan after Old Navy’s comparable sales growth weakened and it faced high costs related to establishing the brand as a stand-alone company. L Brands could come under similar pressures if Bath & Body Works were to lose momentum.Victoria’s Secret clearly needs a new angel. Finding one might be too much of a miracle to pull off.To contact the author of this story: Andrea Felsted at firstname.lastname@example.orgTo contact the editor responsible for this story: Beth Williams at email@example.comThis column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of Bloomberg LP and its owners.Andrea Felsted is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering the consumer and retail industries. She previously worked at the Financial Times.For more articles like this, please visit us at bloomberg.com/opinionSubscribe now to stay ahead with the most trusted business news source.©2020 Bloomberg L.P.
Gap (GPS) benefits from the decision to cancel the spin-off of Old Navy into a stand-alone company. Further, efforts to revive the Gap and Banana Republic brands bode well.
Dillard's (DDS) unveils an activewear brand, Antonio Melani Active. This lifestyle brand is likely to help the company grab a share of the fast-growing activewear market.
Here at Zacks, our focus is on the proven Zacks Rank system, which emphasizes earnings estimates and estimate revisions to find great stocks. Nevertheless, we are always paying attention to the latest value, growth, and momentum trends to underscore strong picks.
Peck unveiled the plan in February last year when Old Navy was a bright spot for the company, which was struggling with out-of-fashion apparel at its Gap brand. The company on Thursday also said that Mark Breitbard, head of Banana Republic, will lead the Gap brand on interim basis after the departure of Chief Executive Officer Neil Fiske.
Gap (GPS) witnesses soft comps performance across all brands as well as weak traffic trends. Also, strained margins and higher expenses are added concerns.
Abercrombie & Fitch enters 2020 ready to make some big changes to its stores. Yahoo Finance talks to CEO Fran Horowitz about its plan.