UK Markets open in 11 mins.

SCANA Corporation (SCG)

NYSE - NYSE Delayed price. Currency in USD
Add to watchlist
65.28+0.72 (+1.12%)
At close: 4:04PM EDT
People also watch
Full screen
Previous close64.56
Bid0.00 x
Ask0.00 x
Day's range64.29 - 65.29
52-week range63.18 - 75.92
Avg. volume944,128
Market cap9.33B
PE ratio (TTM)15.83
Earnings dateN/A
Dividend & yield2.45 (3.79%)
Ex-dividend date2017-06-08
1y target estN/A
Trade prices are not sourced from all markets
  • Capital Cube2 days ago

    ETFs with exposure to SCANA Corp. : July 24, 2017

    Categories: ETFs Yahoo FinanceClick here to see latest analysis ETFs with exposure to SCANA Corp. Here are 5 ETFs with the largest exposure to SCG-US. Comparing the performance and risk of SCANA Corp. with the ETFs that have exposure to it gives us some ETF choices that could give us similar returns with lower volatility. Ticker Fund Name ... Read more (Read more...)

  • American City Business Journals5 days ago

    SCANA: Petition to block construction of V.C. Summer plant is premature

    S.C. Electric & Gas has called on regulators to dismiss a petition from two environmental groups to halt construction on the troubled V.C. Summer nuclear expansion and review whether spending on the project has been prudent. The utility, a subsidiary of South Carolina-based SCANA Corp. (SCG), says there is no legal authority for the S.C. Public Service Commission to halt a project they have already approved. SCE&G says such “reparations” are legal under South Carolina law only if a utility has charged customers more than regulators have approved.

  • American City Business Journals8 days ago

    Report says abandoning Summer nuclear project could save S.C. customers billions

    A report commissioned by environmental groups looking to halt spending on the troubled V.C. Summer nuclear expansion says abandoning the project now could save S.C. rate payers billions of dollars in excess rates. The report gives a preview of the case the Sierra Club and Friends of the Earth will make to the S.C. Public Service Commission in October. Prepared by Mark Cooper of the Institute for Energy and the Environment at Vermont Law School, it asserts that continuing to build the project does not make economic sense.