Corporación Inmobiliaria Vesta S.A.B. de C.V. (VESTA.MX)

54.73 -0.34 (-0.62%) At close: 01:59PM CST

Corporación Inmobiliaria Vesta S.A.B. de C.V.

Paseo de los Tamarindos 90 Tower 2
28th Floor Cuajimalpa de Morelos
Mexico City, DF 05120
Mexico
52 55 5950 0070
https://www.vesta.com.mx

Sector(s): Real Estate
Industry: Real Estate - Diversified
Full-time employees: 

Key executives

Name	Title	Pay	Exercised	Year born
Mr. Lorenzo Manuel Berho Corona	Executive Chairman	N/A	N/A	1961
Mr. Lorenzo Dominique Berho Carranza	Chief Executive Officer	N/A	N/A	1983
Mr. Juan Felipe Sottil Achutegui	Chief Financial Officer	N/A	N/A	1961
Mr. Guillermo Díaz Cupido	Chief Investment Officer	N/A	N/A	1954
Ms. Maria Fernanda Bettinger Davo	Director of Investor Relations	N/A	N/A	1993
Mr. Alejandro Pucheu Romero	General Counsel & Secretary	N/A	N/A	1975
Mr. Rodolfo Gerardo Balmaceda García	Sales Manager	N/A	N/A	N/A
Mr. Alfredo Marcos Paredes Calderon	Chief Human Resources & Integrity Officer	N/A	N/A	1974
Mr. Diego Berho Carranza	Chief Portfolio Officer	N/A	N/A	1988
Mr. Francisco Eduardo Estrada Gomez Pezuela	Executive Regional Vice President – Bajío & Central Region	N/A	N/A	1965

Amounts are as of , and compensation values are for the last fiscal year ending on that date. Pay includes salary, bonuses, etc. Exercised is the value of options exercised during the fiscal year. Currency in MXN.

Description

Corporación Inmobiliaria Vesta, S.A.B. de C.V., together with its subsidiaries, acquires, develops, manages, operates, and leases industrial buildings and distribution facilities in Mexico. The company was incorporated in 1998 and is headquartered in Mexico City, Mexico.

Corporate governance

Corporación Inmobiliaria Vesta S.A.B. de C.V.’s ISS governance QualityScore as of N/A is N/A. The pillar scores are Audit: N/A; Board: N/A; Shareholder rights: N/A; Compensation: N/A.

Corporate governance scores courtesy of Institutional Shareholder Services (ISS). Scores indicate decile rank relative to index or region. A decile score of 1 indicates lower governance risk, while 10 indicates higher governance risk.