Advertisement
UK markets close in 3 hours 19 minutes
  • FTSE 100

    8,231.56
    +26.45 (+0.32%)
     
  • FTSE 250

    20,446.37
    +65.32 (+0.32%)
     
  • AIM

    774.13
    -3.37 (-0.43%)
     
  • GBP/EUR

    1.1831
    -0.0003 (-0.03%)
     
  • GBP/USD

    1.2682
    -0.0040 (-0.31%)
     
  • Bitcoin GBP

    52,239.23
    +793.54 (+1.54%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    1,374.50
    -8.17 (-0.59%)
     
  • S&P 500

    5,487.03
    +13.80 (+0.25%)
     
  • DOW

    38,834.86
    +56.76 (+0.15%)
     
  • CRUDE OIL

    81.73
    +0.16 (+0.20%)
     
  • GOLD FUTURES

    2,352.40
    +5.50 (+0.23%)
     
  • NIKKEI 225

    38,633.02
    +62.26 (+0.16%)
     
  • HANG SENG

    18,335.32
    -95.07 (-0.52%)
     
  • DAX

    18,157.42
    +89.51 (+0.50%)
     
  • CAC 40

    7,638.48
    +68.28 (+0.90%)
     

With 54% institutional ownership, Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. (NASDAQ:SWBI) is a favorite amongst the big guns

Key Insights

  • Given the large stake in the stock by institutions, Smith & Wesson Brands' stock price might be vulnerable to their trading decisions

  • 50% of the business is held by the top 15 shareholders

  • Recent sales by insiders

A look at the shareholders of Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc. (NASDAQ:SWBI) can tell us which group is most powerful. The group holding the most number of shares in the company, around 54% to be precise, is institutions. In other words, the group stands to gain the most (or lose the most) from their investment into the company.

Since institutional have access to huge amounts of capital, their market moves tend to receive a lot of scrutiny by retail or individual investors. Hence, having a considerable amount of institutional money invested in a company is often regarded as a desirable trait.

ADVERTISEMENT

In the chart below, we zoom in on the different ownership groups of Smith & Wesson Brands.

See our latest analysis for Smith & Wesson Brands

ownership-breakdown
ownership-breakdown

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Smith & Wesson Brands?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Smith & Wesson Brands. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Smith & Wesson Brands' historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

earnings-and-revenue-growth
earnings-and-revenue-growth

Institutional investors own over 50% of the company, so together than can probably strongly influence board decisions. Our data indicates that hedge funds own 6.0% of Smith & Wesson Brands. That's interesting, because hedge funds can be quite active and activist. Many look for medium term catalysts that will drive the share price higher. Looking at our data, we can see that the largest shareholder is BlackRock, Inc. with 9.3% of shares outstanding. The Vanguard Group, Inc. is the second largest shareholder owning 7.9% of common stock, and Dimensional Fund Advisors LP holds about 6.6% of the company stock.

A closer look at our ownership figures suggests that the top 15 shareholders have a combined ownership of 50% implying that no single shareholder has a majority.

While it makes sense to study institutional ownership data for a company, it also makes sense to study analyst sentiments to know which way the wind is blowing. There is some analyst coverage of the stock, but it could still become more well known, with time.

Insider Ownership Of Smith & Wesson Brands

The definition of company insiders can be subjective and does vary between jurisdictions. Our data reflects individual insiders, capturing board members at the very least. Management ultimately answers to the board. However, it is not uncommon for managers to be executive board members, especially if they are a founder or the CEO.

Insider ownership is positive when it signals leadership are thinking like the true owners of the company. However, high insider ownership can also give immense power to a small group within the company. This can be negative in some circumstances.

Shareholders would probably be interested to learn that insiders own shares in Smith & Wesson Brands, Inc.. It has a market capitalization of just US$735m, and insiders have US$10m worth of shares, in their own names. It is good to see some investment by insiders, but it might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying.

General Public Ownership

The general public-- including retail investors -- own 38% stake in the company, and hence can't easily be ignored. This size of ownership, while considerable, may not be enough to change company policy if the decision is not in sync with other large shareholders.

Next Steps:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. Consider for instance, the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 4 warning signs with Smith & Wesson Brands , and understanding them should be part of your investment process.

Ultimately the future is most important. You can access this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.